Timbuktu Municipal Court

______________________________________________________________________

CAUSE NUMBER XX-2017-0000999 ( Docket)

STATE OF XXXXXXX, INC.
VS.
JOHN HENRY DOE
_____________________________________________________________________
NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF ALL SIGNATURES BY DECLARATION
______________________________________________________________________

1. The Supreme Court of the United States of America has MANDATED:

“a (private) citizen does not waive a right, unless HE DOES SO KNOWLINGLY AND
WITH FULL APPRECIATION OF ALL CIRCUMSTANCES THEREOF”.[ (Brady v. U.S,
397 U.S. 742.748)]

2. The intent and meaning of the term “right(s)” as used by the Courts, to be inclusive of,
but not limited to, first and foremost unalienable rights, and secondly all other rights, i.e.
“civil rights”, “statutory rights:, “legal rights”, “lawful rights”, “substantive rights”, or rights
by any other nomenclature, and I have not ever, knowingly and with full appreciation of
all circumstances thereof; conveyed, consented, bargained, sold or waived my
unalienable rights or rights by any other nomenclature.

3. I have not ever, knowingly and with full appreciation of all circumstances thereof:
become “surety” for debts, liabilities, obligations, compelled performance, and/or
bankruptcy for any entity, fictional or real, by any name or nomenclature.

4. When a Judge is dealing with a statute, he is no longer a Judge, but is a bought and
paid for Clerk
"It is the accepted rule, not only in state courts, but, of the federal courts as well,
that when a judge is enforcing administrative law they are described as mere
'extensions of the administrative agency for superior reviewing purposes' as a
ministerial clerk for an agency..." [30 Cal 596; 167 Cal 762]

"...judges who become involved in enforcement of mere statutes (civil or criminal

in nature and otherwise), act as mere "clerks" of the involved agency..." [K.C.
Davis, ADMIN. LAW, Ch. 1 (CTP. West's 1965 Ed.)]

that is not competent to do anything judicial

"Ministerial officers are incompetent to receive grants of judicial power from the
legislature, their acts in attempting to exercise such powers are necessarily
nullities" [Burns v. Sup., Ct., SF, 140 Cal. 1]
and is operating in his private capacity as a revenue officer under the Federal Tax Lien
Act of 1966
"(h) DEFINITION’s. …. "(3) MOTOR VEHICLE.-The term 'motor vehicle' means a
self-propelled vehicle which is registered for highway use under the laws of any
State or foreign country. "(4) SECURITY.-The term 'security' means any bond,
debenture, note, or certificate or other evidence of indebtedness, issued by a
corporation or a government or political subdivision thereof, with interest
coupons or in registered form, share of stock, voting trust certificate, or any
certificate of interest or participation in, certificate of deposit or receipt for,
temporary or interim certificate for, or warrant or right to subscribe to or purchase
any of the foregoing: negotiable instrument: or money.” [Federal Tax Lien Act of
1966 at Public Law 89-719 at 80 Stat. 1130-1131]

and is assaulting me with his Article I martial law tribunal for a US citizen / cestui que
trust / slave
". . . (E)very taxpayer is a cestui qui trust having sufficient interest in the
preventing abuse of the trust to be recognized in the field of this court's
prerogative jurisdiction . .” [In Re Bolens (1912), 135 N.W. 164.]

“A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee

and co-beneficiary of the PCT (Public Charitable Trust), the constructive, cestui
que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the
USA and US Inc.” [Congressional Record, June 13 1967, pp. 15641-15646]

“Chap. 854. – An Act to establish a code of law for the District of Columbia.”
which was Approved on March 3, 1901, by the Fifty-Sixth Congress, Session II,[ at 31
Stat. 1189, and at 2, ] where it says;
“And be it further enacted, That in the interpretation and construction of said code
the following rules shall be observed namely:…
“Third. The word “person” shall be held to apply to partnerships and
corporations, …”, [emphasis added]

“The Legal Estate to be in Cestui Que Use” Chapter Fifty-Six in Sec. 1617, at 31 Stat.
1432

and at Chapter three – Absence for Seven Years, in your code [Sec. 252, 253, at 31
Stat. 1230], where it gives the Clerks masquerading as Judges the right to “presume”
that I am a US citizen / cestui que trust / slave / estate;
“SEC. 252. PRESUMPTION OF DEATH. - If any person shall leave his domicile
without any known intention of changing the same, and shall not return or be
heard from for seven years from the time of his so leaving, he shall be presumed
to be dead, in any case wherein his death shall come in question, unless proof be
made that he was alive within that time.”

"We therefore decline to overrule the opinion of Chief Justice Marshall: We hold
that the District of Columbia is not a state within Article 3 of the Constitution. In
other words cases between citizens of the District and those of the states were
not included of the catalogue of controversies over which the Congress could

Page 2 of 8 Notice of Revocation of Signatures by Declaration

give jurisdiction to the federal courts by virtue of Article 3. In other words
Congress has exclusive legislative jurisdiction over citizens of Washington
District of Columbia and through their plenary power nationally covers those
citizens even when in one of the several states as though the district expands for
the purpose of regulating its citizens wherever they go throughout the states in
union" National Mutual Insurance Company of the District of Columbia v. Tidewater
Transfer Company, 337 U.S. 582, 93 L.Ed. 1556 (1948)

and the US citizen / cestui que trust / slave which originated with the Roman Cult
“Yet still it was found difficult to set bounds to ecclesiastical ingenuity; for when
they were driven out of all their former holds, they devised a new method of
conveyance, by which the lands were granted, not to themselves directly, but to
nominal feoffees to the use of the religious houses; thus distinguishing between
the possession and the use, and receiving the actual profits, while the seisin of
the lands remained in the nominal feoffee, who was held by the courts of equity
(then under the direction of the clergy) to be bound in conscience to account to
his cestui que use for the rents and emoluments of the estate: and it is to these
inventions that our practitioners are indebted for the introduction of uses and
trusts, the foundation of modern conveyancing.” Tomlins Law Dictionary 1835
edition, Volume 2 under the definition of Mortmain

and assaulting me further with his corporate STATE OF XXXXXXXX, INC., statutes that
are actually Federal statutes under the International Law Rule
“INTERNATIONAL LAW RULE: Adopted for areas under Federal legislative
jurisdiction” “Federalizes State civil law, including common law.--The rule serves
to federalize not only the statutory but the common law of a State.… STATE AND
FEDERAL VENUE DISCUSSED: The civil laws effective in an area of exclusive
Federal jurisdiction are Federal law, notwithstanding their derivation from State
laws, and a cause arising under such laws may be brought in or removed to a
Federal district court under sections 24 or 28 of the former Judicial Code (now
sections 1331 and 1441 of title 28, United States Code), giving jurisdiction to such
courts of civil actions arising under the "* * *laws * * * of the United States" where
the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $3,000, exclusive of interest
and costs” Jurisdiction over Federal Areas Within the States – Report of the
Interdepartmental Committee for the Study of Jurisdiction over Federal Areas Within the
States, Part II, A Text of the Law of Legislative Jurisdiction Submitted to the Attorney
General and Transmitted to the President June 1957, page 158-165

all of which is with the ultimate objective to assault me with their United Nations
UNIDROIT Statute and their satanic Uniform Commercial Code
“Whenever [the Uniform Commercial Code] creates a "presumption" with respect
to a fact, or provides that a fact is "presumed," the trier of fact must find the
existence of the fact unless and until evidence is introduced that supports a
finding of its nonexistence.” UCC § 1-206 Presumptions [emphasis added]

so they can forge my signature on one of their contracts

The words “penal” and “penalty” in their strict and primary sense denote a
punishment, whether corporal or pecuniary, imposed and enforced by the state

Page 3 of 8 Notice of Revocation of Signatures by Declaration

for a crime or offense against its laws. The noun penalty is defined forfeiture or to
be forfeited for noncompliance with an agreement. The words forfeit and penalty
are substantially synonymous. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Dewey Portland Cement
Co., 242 P. 257, 259, 113 Okla. 142.

“(a) In an action with respect to an instrument, the authenticity of, and authority to
make, each signature on the instrument are admitted unless specifically denied in
the pleadings. If the validity of a signature is denied in the pleadings, the burden
of establishing validity is on the person claiming validity, but the signature is
presumed to be authentic and authorized unless the action is to enforce the
liability of the purported signer and the signer is dead or incompetent at the time
of trial of the issue of validity of the signature.” Uniform Commercial Code § 3.308
Proof of Signatures and Status as Holder in Due Course [emphasis added]

and securitize it and sell it on Wall Street

“The following rules apply in an action on a certificated security against the
issuer:
(1) Unless specifically denied in the pleadings, each signature on a security
certificate or in a necessary indorsement is admitted.
(2) If the effectiveness of a signature is put in issue, the burden of establishing
effectiveness is on the party claiming under the signature, but the signature is
presumed to be genuine or authorized.” Uniform Commercial Code § 8.114
Evidentiary Rules Concerning Certificated Securities [emphasis added]

and use their fraudulent fictitious so-called contract to sell me, the living man into slavery
in their commercial prison as surety for their US citizen slave
"But individuals, when acting as representatives of a collective group, cannot be
said to be exercising their personal rights and duties, nor be entitled to their
purely personal privileges. Rather they assume the rights, duties and privileges of
the artificial entity or association of which they are agents or officers and they are
bound by its obligations." [Brasswell v. United States 487 U.S. 99 (1988) quoting,
United States v. White 322 U.S. 694 (1944)

“He [the prisoner] has as a consequence of his crime, not only forfeited his liberty
but all his personal rights except those which the law in its humanity affords him.
He is for the time being a slave of the state.” 62 Va. (21 Gratt.) 790, 796 (1871)

5. My signature that may appear on any and all instruments, documents, forms, or other
named piece of paper, that gives rise to the presumption of Public Policy / Commerce /
Admiralty / Maritime Jurisdiction or Jurisdiction of any other nature not found in a
competent Court of Law of proper jurisdiction, or that gives rise to presumption of
consent to incur liabilities, obligations or debts in sums of money or property alleged to
be due and owing to any entity, inclusive of, but not limited to; International Entities or
Federal/State/Local Governments or Public/Private Corporations or entities by any other

Page 4 of 8 Notice of Revocation of Signatures by Declaration

name or nomenclature, are hereby rescinded and revoked, for good and just cause, ab
initio, nunct pro tunct.

6. All signatures are hereby revoked and rescinded in this case including but not limited to,
all signatures
All unconscionable contracts are subject to rescission under the common law for
failure to make the proper disclosures in order to constitute an acceptance, where
there is no meeting of the minds there is no contract as set forth in In re Maxwell
v. Fairbanks Capital Corporation, 281 B.R. 101, (2002); Bankr.Lexis 759

7. This NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF ALL SIGNATURES BY DECLARATION Instrument

is binding on all entities, by any name or nomenclature, until a real and true
controverting party, by judicial initiative in a Court of Law with proper jurisdiction,
produces true and real evidence to lawfully controvert EVERY element of this
instrument.

8. You have no authority to use your international law against me

“The government of the United States . . . is one of limited powers. It can exercise
authority over no subjects, except those which have been delegated to it.
Congress cannot, by legislation, enlarge the federal jurisdiction, nor can it be
enlarged under the treaty-making power” Mayor of New Orleans v. United States,
10 Pet. 662, 736 [emphasis added]

“but Madison insisted that just “because this power is given to Congress,” it did
not follow that the Treaty Power was “absolute and unlimited.” The President and
the Senate lacked the power “to dismember the empire,” for example, because
“[t]he exercise of the power must be consistent with the object of the delegation.”
“The object of treaties,” in Madison’s oft-repeated formulation, “is the regulation
of intercourse with foreign nations, and is external.” Bond v United States 572 US
____ (2014) case number 12-158 [emphasis added]

“Today, it is enough to highlight some of the structural and historical evidence

suggesting that the Treaty Power can be used to arrange intercourse with other
nations, but not to regulate purely domestic affairs.” Bond v United States 572 US
____ (2014) case number 12-158 [emphasis added]

but since these insist on assaulting me with their International law, XXXXXXXX is under
a military occupation under your Hague Convention IV, and your Lieber Code
“Territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of
the hostile army.
The occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been
established and can be exercised.” Law and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV),
Article 42

Page 5 of 8 Notice of Revocation of Signatures by Declaration

“A place, district, or country occupied by an enemy stands, in consequence of the
occupation, under the Martial Law of the invading or occupying army, whether any
proclamation declaring Martial Law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has
been issued or not. Martial Law is the immediate and direct effect and
consequence of occupation or conquest. The presence of a hostile army
proclaims its Martial Law.” Article 1, Lieber Code [emphasis added]

because XXXXXXXX was listed as Indian Territory in the Royal Proclamation of 1763,
prior to the United States of America gaining possession with the Louisiana purchase,
and there has been no Treaty of Peace and no proclamation ending Martial Law
“Martial Law does not cease during the hostile occupation, except by special
proclamation, ordered by the commander in chief; or by special mention in the
treaty of peace concluding the war, when the occupation of a place or territory
continues beyond the conclusion of peace as one of the conditions of the same.”
Article 2, Lieber Code [emphasis added]

therefore, your Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in a time of

War of 1949 applies
“In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in peacetime, the
present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any other armed
conflict which may arise between two or more of the High Contracting Parties,
even if the state of war is not recognized by one of them.
The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total occupation of the
territory of a High Contracting Party, even if the said occupation meets with no
armed resistance.
Although one of the Powers in conflict may not be a party to the present
Convention, the Powers who are parties thereto shall remain bound by it in their
mutual relations. They shall furthermore be bound by the Convention in relation to
the said Power, if the latter accepts and applies the provisions thereof.” Article 2,
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949
[emphasis added]

and continues to this day

“NOTE: Under the Law-Martial, only the criminal jurisdiction of a Military Court is
the recognized law. But as Article Three says, "the civil courts can continue
wholly or in part as long as the civil jurisdiction does not violate the Military
orders laid down by the Commander in Chief or one of his Commanders." By this
means; a military venue, jurisdiction, and authority are imposed upon the
occupied populace under disguise of the ordinary civil courts and officers of the
occupied district or region, because the so-called civil authorities in an occupied
district, or region, only act at the pleasure of a military authority.
It should also be noted here that the several State Legislatures, County Boards of
Commissioners, and City Councils, are constantly legislating to please the edicts
of the federal government (the occupying force) and that their legislation, in this
sense, is not an exercise of State sovereignty, but instead, a compliance with
edicts of the military force which occupies the several States and consequently

Page 6 of 8 Notice of Revocation of Signatures by Declaration

are edicts of Martial Law Rule.” Dyett v Turner 439 P2d 266 @ 269, 20 U2d 403
[1968] The Non-Ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment by Judge A.H. Ellett, Utah
Supreme Court [emphasis added]

“The present Convention shall apply from the outset of any conflict or occupation
mentioned in Article 2.
In the territory of Parties to the conflict, the application of the present Convention
shall cease on the general close of military operations.
In the case of occupied territory, the application of the present Convention shall
cease one year after the general close of military operations; however, the
Occupying Power shall be bound, for the duration of the occupation, to the extent
that such Power exercises the functions of government in such territory, by the
provisions of the following Articles of the present Convention: 1 to 12, 27, 29 to
34, 47, 49, 51, 52, 53, 59, 61 to 77, 143.” Article 6, Geneva Convention Relative to the
Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949 [emphasis added]

and this Court is NOT respecting my right NOT to participate in their Roman Cult satanic
religious ceremony show-trial kangaroo court as found in Article 27
“Protected persons are entitled, in all circumstances, to respect for their persons,
their honour, their family rights, their religious convictions and practices, and
their manners and customs.
Without prejudice to the provisions relating to their state of health, age and sex,
all protected persons shall be treated with the same consideration by the Party to
the conflict in whose power they are, without any adverse distinction based, in
particular, on race, religion or political opinion.” Article 27, Geneva Convention
Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949 [emphasis added]

and this Court is NOT respecting my right NOT to be intimidated and terrorized and is
engaged in pillaging and reprisals against my person and my property, and punishing
me for offences that their fraudulently created cestui que trust / US citizen / estate
committed under Article 33
“No protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not
personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of
intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited.
Pillage is prohibited.
Reprisals against protected persons and their property are prohibited.” Article 33,
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 1949
[emphasis added]

and this Court is assaulting me with their codes rules and regulations in violation of your
‘Articles’ [Article 52]
“No contract, agreement or regulation shall impair the right of any worker,
whether voluntary or not and wherever he may be, to apply to the representatives
of the Protecting Power in order to request the said Power’s intervention….”
Article 52, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of
1949 [emphasis added]

Page 7 of 8 Notice of Revocation of Signatures by Declaration

and this Court is denying my right to a neutral and unbiased trial as required by your
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 14, Clause 1
“All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of
any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law,
everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent,
independent and impartial tribunal established by law.” International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights, Article 14, Clause 1

I, john henry; house of doe, Sui Juris, a natural man of XXXXXXXX, a common man, does
declare that I have scribed and read the foregoing facts, and in accordance with the best of my
firsthand knowledge, such are true, correct, complete and not misleading, the truth, the whole
truth and nothing but the truth, before God, Angels, and everybody who reads this document as
witnesses, and pursuant to your rules of evidence.

This Declaration is dated this ______________ day of April in the year, two thousand and
seventeen.

_____________________________________________L.S.
john henry; house of doe, sui juris
a man, holder of the office of "the people"
bloodline American, on the land 1760
Peaceful inhabitant of XXXXXXX
With full responsibility for my actions
under YHWH’s law as found in the Holy Bible and no other
With a postal address of;
Non-Domestic Mail
c/o 300 Smith Ave., Northeast
Great Falls, Montana [RFD 59404]
ZIP CODE EXEMPT

Page 8 of 8 Notice of Revocation of Signatures by Declaration