100% found this document useful (1 vote)
192 views

Chap004 ch4 Solution of Power Electronics by Daniel W

This document contains solutions to example problems about rectifier circuits from a textbook on power electronics. It provides the calculations for various rectifier loads to determine output voltage, current, power, and power factor. The solutions include both full-wave and center-tapped rectifier circuits using DC and AC sources. Fourier analysis is applied to calculate RMS values of current when the load is not purely resistive.

Uploaded by

Robin Eduard
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
192 views

Chap004 ch4 Solution of Power Electronics by Daniel W

This document contains solutions to example problems about rectifier circuits from a textbook on power electronics. It provides the calculations for various rectifier loads to determine output voltage, current, power, and power factor. The solutions include both full-wave and center-tapped rectifier circuits using DC and AC sources. Fourier analysis is applied to calculate RMS values of current when the load is not purely resistive.

Uploaded by

Robin Eduard
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 30

lOMoARcPSD|5469992

Chap004 - CH4 Solution of Power Electronics by Daniel


W.Hart
Studies in Teaching Material of Industrial Education (National Taiwan University)

StuDocu no está patrocinado ni avalado por ningún colegio o universidad.


Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])
lOMoARcPSD|5469992

CHAPTER 4 SOLUTIONS
2/17/10

4-1) Load:

2Vm V 2 2(120) / 
Vo  ; Io  o  6.0 A.
 R 18
V 120 2 9.43
I o , peak  m  9.43 A.; I o ,rms  6.67 A.
R 18 2

Each diode:

I o 6.0 I
I D ,avg   3.0 A.; I D , peak I o , peak 9.43 A.; I D ,rms  o,rms 4.71 A.
2 2 2

4-2)

2Vm 2  120  2 V 108


bridge : Vo   108 V .; I o  o  4.32 A.
  R 25
PIV Vm 120 2 170 V .
Center tapped : Vm 120 2, I o 4.32 A.; PIV 2Vm 2(120) 2 340 V .

4-3)

V 2V 200
I0  0  m  4.24 A.
R  R  15
2V  1 1  Vn
Vn  m    ; Z n  R  ( no L) ; I n 
2 2

  n  1 n 1  Zn
V2 42.4, V4 8.49, ; Z 2 47.7 , Z 4 91.7 
42.4 V
I2  0.890 A., I 4  4 0.0925 A.
47.7 Z4
2
 0.890  (0.0925) 2
I rms   I  4.24  
2
n
2
  4.29 A.
 2  2
1 I
I D  I 0 2.12 A.; I D ,rms  o ,rms 3.03 A.
2 2
I s 0; I s ,rms I o ,rms 4.29 A.

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-4)

V 2V 340
I0  0  m  10.8 A.
R  R  10
2V  1 1  Vn
Vn  m    ; Z n  R  ( no L) ; I n 
2 2

  n  1 n 1  Zn
V2 72.2, V4 14.4, ; Z 2 21.3 , Z 4 39.0 
72.2 V
I2  3.38 A., I 4  4 0.37 A.
21.3 Z4
2
 3.38  (0.37) 2
I rms   I  10.8  
2
n
2
  11.1 A.
 2  2
1 I
I D  I 0 5.4 A.; I D , rms  o ,rms 7.84 A.
2 2
I s 0; I s ,rms I o ,rms 11.1 A.

4-5)

a) Average load current : R 15 L 30 mH


V 2V /  2(120) 2 /  108
Io  o  m   7.20 A.
R R 15 15

b) Power is determined from the Fourier series. Using Eq. 4-4 and 4-5.

n Vn, V. Zn. Ω In, A.


2 72.0 27.1 2.65
4 14.4 47.7 0.302

2 2
 2.65   0.32 
I rms  7.202      7.45 A.; P I rms R (7.45) 25 832 W .
2 2

 2   2 
P 832
I s , rms I o,rms 7.45 A.; pf   0.93
S (120)(7.45)

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-6

a) Average load current : R 12 L 20 mH


V 2V /  2(120) 2 /  108
Io  o  m   9.0 A.
R R 12 12

b) Power is determined from the Fourier series. Using Eq. 4-4 and 4-5.

n Vn, V. Zn. Ω In, A.


2 72.0 19.3 3.74
4 14.4 32.5 0.444

2 2
 3.74   0.444 
I rms  9.0  
2
   9.39 A.; P I rms R (9.39) 12 1, 058 W .
2 2

 2   2 
P 1058
I s , rms I o,rms 9.39 A.; pf   0.94
S (120)(9.39)

4-7)

V 2V 2 2(40)
a) I o  o  m  9.0 A.
R R 4
I V 40
b) I rms  m  o , rms  10 A.
2 R 4
c) I s ,avg 0
N   40 
d ) I s , rms I o ,rms  2  10   1.67 A.
 N1   240 

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-8) Load:

2Vm
Vo I o R (10)(15) 150 V 

V  150
Vm  o  2.36 V .
2 2
V 236
Vo ,rms  m  166.6 V . on each sec. tap, 333.2 V . overall
2 2
N V 120
120 V . source : 1  1  0.36:1 or 1:2.78
N 2 V2 333.2
N1 240
240 V . source :  0.72:1 or 1:1.39
N 2 333.2

4-9)

2Vm
V I o R (5)(10) 50 V . 

V  50
Vm  o  78.5 V .
2 2
V 78.5
Vo,rms  m  55.5 V . on each sec. tap, 111 V . overall
2 2
N V 120
120 V . source : 1  1  1.08:1
N 2 V2 111
N1 240
240 V . source :  2.16:1
N 2 111

4-10)

V 2V
a ) I o 10 A.  o  m
R R
2V 2(120) 2
R m  10.8  total
 Io  10
Rx 10.8  4 6.8 
b) V2 72 Z 2 151
V2 72
I2   0.4764
Z 2 151
I o 2 I 2 2(0.4764) 0.953 A.

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-11)

2Vm 2(120) 2
 Vdc  48
Vo  Vdc  
a) I o    20.0 A.
R R 3
Pdc I oVdc (20.0)(48) 961 W .

b) Fourier Series

n Vn, V. Zn. Ω In, A.


2 72.2 11.7 6.16
4 14.4 22.8 0.631

2 2
 6.16   0.631 
I rms  20.0  
2
   20.5 A.
 2   2 
PR I rms
2
R (20.5)2 (3) 1, 259 W .
 170  P 961  1259
c ) S Vrms I rms   (20.5) 2460 VA; pf  S  2460 .90
 2
d ) I o 2 I 2 6.16 12.32 A.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

4-12

2Vm 2(340)
 Vdc  96
Vo  Vdc
a) I o      24.1 A.
R R 5
Pdc I oVdc (24.1)(96) 2,313 W .

b) Fourier Series

n Vn, V. Zn. Ω In, A.


2 144.3 30.6 4.72
4 28.9 60.5 0.477

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

2 2
 4.72   0.477 
I rms  24.1  
2
   24.3 A.
 2   2 
PR I rms
2
R (24.1)2 (5) 1,958 W .
 340  P 2313  1958
c ) S Vrms I rms   (24.3) 5,848 VA; pf  S  5848 .90
 2
d ) I o 2 I 2 4.72 9.44 A.

4-13) I 0 7.03 A. from PSpice

4-14) a) Continuous current; P=474 W.

b) Discontinuous current; P=805 W.

4-15

2Vm 2(120 2)
 Vdc  24
Vo  Vdc
a) I o      21.0 A.
R R 4
Pdc I oVdc (21.0)(24) 504 W .

b) Fourier Series

n Vn, V. Zn. Ω In, A.


2 72.0 30.4 2.37
4 14.4 60.5 0.238

2 2
 2.37   0.238 
I rms  21  
2
   21.1 A.
 2   2 
PR I rms
2
R (21.1) 2 (4) 1, 777 W .
P 504  1777
c ) S Vrms I rms  120  (21.1) 2,529 VA; pf   .90
S 2529

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-16

2Vm 2(120 2)
 Vdc  36
Vo  Vdc
a) Io      14.4 A.
R R 5
Pdc I oVdc (14.4)(36) 519 W .

b) Fourier Series

n Vn, V. Zn. Ω In, A.


2 72.0 45.5 1.58
4 14.4 90.6 0.159

2 2
 1.58   0.159 
I rms  14.42      14.45 A.
 2   2 
PR I rms
2
R (14.45) 2 (5) 1, 044 W .
P 519  1044
c) S Vrms I rms  120  (14.45) 1, 734 VA; pf   .90
S 1734

_____________________________________________________________________________________

4-17)

26.5A

100uH

20.0A

40mH

10.0A

0A
150ms 152ms 154ms 156ms 158ms 160ms 162ms 164ms 166ms 168ms 170ms 172ms 174ms
I(L1)
Time

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

The current with the 100 μH inductor is discontinuous.

4-18)

Vm
V  ; Vo Vm 120 2 169.7 V .; 0.01Vo 1.7 V .
2 fRC
Vm 169.7
C  4160  F .
2 fRVo 2(60)(200)(1.7)
I o Vo 169.7
ID    0.43 A.
2 2 R 2(200)
I D , peak : from Eq. 4  11,
 Vo  1 1.7 
 sin  1  1   sin  1   81.9
 Vm   169.7 
 sin  
From Eq. 3  48, I D , peak Vm  C cos   
 R 
 sin 81.9 
120 2  377(8.32)(10)  3 cos81.9   38.5 A.
 200 

4-19)

V 100
Req  o  200 ; Vm 100 Vo ; Vo 1 V .
I o 0.5
Vm 100
C  4167  F .
2 fRC Vo 2(60)(200)(1)
Io
ID  0.2 A.
2
 Vo 
From Eq. 4  11,  sin  1  1  1
 sin (0.99) 81.9
 Vo 
 sin  
From Eq. 3  48, I D , peak Vm   C cos   
 R 
 sin 81.9 
100  377(4167)(10)  6 cos81.9   22.6 A.
 200 

4-20) C ≈ 3333/2 = 1667 µF. Peak diode currents are the same. Fullwave circuit has
advantages of zero average source current, smaller capacitor, and average diode current ½ that

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

for the halfwave. The halfwave circuit has fewer diodes, and has only one diode voltage drop
rather than two.

4-21)

3 L 3(377)(.01)
a ) R 7  :  1.62
R 7
> 1  continuous current
2Vm
Vo  108 V .

3 L 3(377)(.01)
b) R 20  :  0.57
R 20
From Fig . 4  8, Vo 0.7Vm 0.7(120) 2 119 V .
V   119 
(1) Eq. 4  18 :  sin  1  o  sin  1   0.777 rad .
 Vm   120 2 
1
(2) Eq. 4  20 : I L (t )  [Vm (cos   cos t )  Vo (t   )] < 1 
L
iL (  ) 0 Vm (cos   cos  )  Vo (    )
120 2(cos(.777)  cos  )  119(   .777)   3.216 rad .

1
(3) I L  iL (t )d (t ) 6.14 A.

(4) Vo I L R (6.14)(20) 122.9 V . 119 V .

Calculated Vo is slightly larger than initial estimate. Try Vo=120 V.:

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

(1) Vo 120 V . From Eq. 4  18,  0.785


(2) From Eq. 4  20,
i(  ) 0 120 2[cos(.785)  cos  ]  120(   .785)   3.197 rad .

1
 
(3) I L  i (t )d (t ) 5.895 A.

(4) Vo I L R (5.895)(20) 117.9 V .  120

Therefore, 119 < Vo < 120 V. (Vo=119.6 with more iterations.)

c) PSpice results:

127

R=20

R=7
100

50

R=7

R=20
0
559ms 560ms 561ms 562ms 563ms 564ms 565ms 566ms 567ms 568ms 569ms 570ms
V(OUT+,OUT-) I(L1)
Time

R = 7 results in continuous current with Vo = 108 V. R = 20 results in discontinuous current with Vo =


120 V. The simulation was done with C = 10,000 μF.

4-22) PSpice results with a 0.5 Ω resistance in series with the inductance: For Rload = 5 Ω,
Vo=56.6 V. (compared to 63.7 volts with an ideal inductor); for Rload = 50 Ω, Vo=82.7 V.
(compared to 84.1 volts with an ideal inductor).

4-23)

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

Vm 120 2
a) I o  (1  cos  )  (1  cos 45 ) 4.61 A.
R  20
V 1  sin  120 2 1 45( /180) sin 90
b) I rms  m      5.72 A.
R 2 2 4 20 2 2 4
c) I s ,rms I o ,rms 5.72 A.
d ) P I rms
2
R (5.72) 2 20 655 W .; S Vrms I rms (120)(5.72) 686 VA.
P 655
pf   0.954
S 686

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-24)

V 1  sin 2
I rms  m  
R 2 2 4
V 
S Vrms I rms  m  ; P I rms
2
R
 2
Vm 1  sin 2
2 2  
pf 
P

I Rrms

2 I rms R
 R 2 2 4
S  Vm  Vm Vm
  I rms
 2
1  sin 2  sin 2
 2    1 
2 2 4  2

4-25) a) α = 15° : Check for continuous current. First period:

V
i (t )  m sin((t )   )  Ae  t / 10.84sin(t  0.646)  5.75e  t /.754
Z
i (  ) 0   217 ;   180 37    continuous current
Or
L 377(0.050)
 tan  1 tan  1 37    continuous current
R 25
2V V 208.7
Vo  m cos  208.7 V .; I o  o  8.35 A.
 R 25

b) α = 75° Check for continuous current. First period:

 37 from part a,  75  discontinuous current


V
i(t )  m sin((t )   )  Ae  t / 10.84sin(t  0.646)  37.9e  t /0.754
Z
i(  ) 0   216 ;   180 36    discontinuous current

1
I o  i(t ) d (t ) 2.32 A.


Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-26)a) α = 20°: Check for continuous current. First period:

V
i(t )  m sin((t )   )  Ae  t / 4.12sin(t  0.756)  2.36e  t /0.943
Z
i(  ) 0   224 ,   180 42    continuous current
L 377(0.075)
 tan  1 tan  1 43    continuous current
R 30
2V V 101.5
Vo  m cos  101.5 V .; I o  o  3.38 A.
 R 30

b) α = 80°: Check for continuous current. First period:

V
i (t )  m sin((t )   )  Ae  t / 4.12sin(t  0.756)  10.8e  t /0.943
Z
i (  ) 0   221 ;   180 41    discontinuous current
L
 tan  1 37    discontinuous current
R

1
I o  i (t )d  t  0.838 A.


4-27) The source current is a square wave of ±Io.

V 2V
P I rms
2
R I o2 R; I o  o  m
pf R R
2 2
 2V   2V  1
P  m  R  m 
 R     R
Vm  2Vm  2Vm2
S Vs ,rms I s ,rms Vs ,rms I o    
2  R  R
2
 2Vm  1
P    R 2 2
pf   
S 2Vm2 
R

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-28)

I o 4.5 A.  Vo I o R 4.5(20) 90 V .

I o 8 A.  Vo I o R 8(20) 160 V .
V 160
Eq. 4  23 : Vo  m (1  cos  ): forVo 160 V . and  0, Vm  251 V .
 2
V    90 
forVm 251 and Vo 90,  cos  1  o  1 cos  1   1 82.7
V
 m   251 
V ' 120 2
turns ratio  m  0.68 :1 or 1:148
Vm 251

Note that the turns ratio could be lower (higher secondary voltage) and α adjusted accordingly.

4-29)

Vo I o R 10(5) 50 V .; from Eq. 4  30,


V   50 
 cos  1  o  cos  1   62.5
 2Vm   2 2  120  
 
 L   1  377(.1) 
check for continuous current : tan  1   tan   82.4
 R   5 
62.5  82.4  continuous
V2 132 V . Z 2 75.6  I 2 1.75 A.
I o 2(1.75) 3.5 A.

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-30)

2Vm 2 2(240)
Vo  cos   cos105  56 V .
 
100  56
Io  4.4 A.; Pdc I oVdc (4.4)(100) 440 W .
10
Pac Pbridge I oVo (4.4)(56) 246 W .
PR Pdc  Pac 440  246 194 W .
V2
From Fig . 4  12, 0.83 for  105
Vm
V2 0.83 Vm 0.83 2(240) 281 V .
Z 2  R  j 2 L  10  j 2(377)(.8) 603  R
V2 281
I2   0.47 A.; I o 2 I 2 0.94 A. p  p
Z 2 603

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-31)

V V
a ) I o  o dc
R
V  V  1
Pbridge (absorbed )  I o ( Vo )  o dc  (  Vo )    (Vo2  VoVdc )
 R   R
Vo  VoVdc  Pbr R 0
2

Vo2  100Vo  2000(0.8) 0


Vo  20 V or  80 V .
2000 2000
with Vo  20, I o  100 A.; with Vo  80, I o  25 A.
20 80
choose Vo  80 V . to minimize losses
V    80 
 =cos  1  o  cos  1   137.8
 2Vm   2 2(120 
V
b) at  137.8 , from Fig . 4  12, 2 0.65  V2 0.65 2(120) 110 V .
Vm
I o  (.1) I o (.1)(25) 2.5 A.
I
I 2  o 1.25 A.
2
V 110
Z2  2  88   R  j 2o L 2o L
I 2 1.25
Z 88
L 2  0.117 H 117 mH
2o 2(377)

Choose L somewhat larger, say 120 mH, to allow for approximations.

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-32) In Fig. 4-14, Pac = Pbridge = -VoIo = 1000 W. Using Vdc = -96 V gives this solution:

Kirchhoff ' s voltage law gives  Vo  (1)I o  96 0

 1000
Vo 
Io

1000
 I o  96 0
Io

I o2  96 I o  1000 0

I o 84.11 or 11.89 A. Use11.89 A.

then Vo  84.11V .

V    84.11 
 cos  1  o 1
 cos   141.1

 2Vm   2  120  2 

From Fig.4  14,


V2
Vm
0.64 gives V2 0.64 120 2 109 V .  
1.189
I o 2 I 2 0.10  I o  1.189 A. I2  0.595 A
2
V 109
Z2  2  183  R  j L  1  j L
I 2 0.595

183 183
 L 183 L  0.48 H .
 377

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-33)

a ) Pdc 5000 W . absorbed  I oVdc  5000


 5000
Io  33.3 A.
 150
Vo  150  0.6 I o  150  0.6(33.3)  130 V .
2Vm V    130 
Vo  cos    cos  1  o  cos  1   127
  2Vm   2 2(240) 
b) Pbridge I o ( Vo ) (33.3)(130) 4329 W .
V2
c) From Fig. 4  12, at 127 , 0.73  V2 0.73(240) 2 248 V .
Vm
I o
I o 0.1I o 0.1(33.3) A.; I 2  1.67 A.
2
V 248
Z2  2  149  2o L
I 2 1.67
149
L 0.197 H 200 mH
2(377)

4-34)

3Vm 3 2(480)
a ) Vo   648 V .
 
V 648
Io  o  12.96 A.
R 50
V 480 2  2
b) io (t )  m sin t  sin t 13.6sin t for t 
R 50 3 3
2 /3
1
I rms   (13.6sin t ) d (t ) 12.98 A.
2

 /3  /3

2
I s ,rms  (12.98) 10.6 A.
3
c ) P I rms
2
R (12.98)2 50 8419 W .
S  3VI  3(480)(10.6) 8808 VA
P 8419
pf   0.956
S 8808

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-35)

3Vm 3 2(240) V 324


a ) Vo   324 V .; I o  o  4.05 A.
  R 80
6Vm
b) V6  0.055Vm 0.055 2(240) 18.5 V .
 (62  1)
Z 6 R 80
V6 18.5
I6   0.23 A.
Z6 80
2
 0.23 
I rms  I  I 6 rms  4.05  
2
o
2
 4.06 A.
 2 
I 4.04
c) I D  o  2.02 A.
2 2
I 4.05
d ) I D ,rms  o, rms  2.87 A.
2 2
I o,rms 2 4.06 2
e) I s ,rms   3.31 A.
3 3
f ) P I 2
o , rms R (4.06) 2 80 1315 W .; S  3VI  3(240)(3.31) 1376 VA
P 1315
pf   0.956
S 1376

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-36)

3Vm 3 2(480) V 649


a ) Vo   649 V .; I o  o  6.49 A.
  R 100
6Vm
b) V6  0.055Vm 0.055 2(480) 37.1 V .
 (62  1)
Z 6  R  j 6o L  100  j 6(377)(.015)  100  j37.9 106 
V6 37.1
I6   0.35 A.
Z 6 106
2
 0.35 
I rms  I  I 6 rms  6.49  
2
o
2
 6.49 A.
 2 
I 6.49
c) I D  o  3.25 A.
2 2
I 6.49
d ) I D , rms  o ,rms  4.59 A.
2 2
I o ,rms 2 6.49 2
e) I s , rms   5.3 A.
3 3
f ) P I 2
o , rms R (6.49) 2100 4212 W .; S  3VI  3(480)(5.3) 4406 VA
P 4212
pf   0.956
S 4406

4-37)

There are no differences between the calculations in Problem 4.36 and the PSpice results. The
power absorbed by each diode ia approximately 1.9 W.

4-38)Equation (4-46) gives values of of I1 = 28.6 A, I5 = 5.71 A, I7 = 4.08 A, I11 = 2.60 A, and I13
= 2.20 A. All compare well with the PSpice results. The total harmonic distortion (THD) is
27.2% when including harmonics through n = 13.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-39)

a ) Vo I o R (25)(120) 3000 V .
 V    3000 
 cos  1  o  cos  1   57.7
 3Vm   3 2(4160) 
V
b) From Fig. 4  21, 6 0.28  V6 0.28 2(4160) 1640 V .
Vm
V12
0.135  V12 794 V .
Vm
V18
0.09  V18 525 V .
Vm

c)

50A

0A Load

-50A
I(R)

40A
S1

0A
I(S1)
80A

S4
SEL>>
0A
I(S4)
50A
Ia
0A

-50A
65ms 70ms 75ms 80ms 85ms 90ms 95ms 100ms
-I(VAN)
Time

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-40)

a ) Vo I o R (10)(50) 500 V .
 V    500 
 cos  1  o  cos  1   39.5
 3Vm   3 2(480) 
V
b) From Fig . 4  21, 6 0.21  V6 0.21 2(480) 143 V .
Vm
V12
0.1  V12 68 V .
Vm
V18
0.07  V18 48 V .
Vm

c)

20A

SEL>> Load
-20A
I(R)

S1
10A

0A
I(S1)

10A S4

0A
I(S4)

10A
0A Ia

-10A

65ms 70ms 75ms 80ms 85ms 90ms 95ms 100ms


-I(VAN)
Time

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-41)

3Vm 3 2(480)
a ) Vo  cos   cos 35 531 V .
 
V 531
Io  o  10.6 A.
R 50
V
b) 6 0.19  V6 0.19 2(480) 130 V .
Vm
Z 6  R  j 60 L  50  j 6(377)(0.05) 124 
V6 130
I6   1.05 A.
Z 6 124
2 2
 I   1.05 
I o ,rms  i   6   10.62  
2
o  10.65 A.
 2  2 
 2  2
I s ,rms   I o, rms   10.65 8.6 A.
 3  3

4-42)

3Vm 3 2(480)
a ) Vo  cos   cos 50 417 V .
 
V 417
Io  o  41.7 A.
R 10
V
b) 6 0.25  V6 0.25 2(480) 170 V .
Vm
Z 6  R  j 60 L  10  j 6(377)(0.01) 24.7 
V6 170
I6   6.9 A.
Z 6 24.7
2 2
 I   6.9 
I o ,rms  i   6   41.72  
2
o  42.3 A.
 2  2
 2  2
I s ,rms   I o,rms   41.7 34 A.
 3  3

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-43)

a ) Vo I o R (20)(20) 400 V .

 V    400 
a cos  1  o  cos  1   52
 3Vm   3 2(480) 
V
b) From Fig. 4  21, 6 0.25  V6 0.25( 2)(480) 170 V .
Vm
2 2 2
 I 6   I12   I18 
       0.02 I o or I 62  I122  I182  0.02 2 I o
 2  2  2
Z 6  R  j 6 L
V6
I 6  0.02 I o 0.02(20) 0.4 A.
Z6
V 170
Z6  6  425   R  j 6 L  20  j 6(377) L
I 6 0.4
6(377) L 425
425
L 0.188 H
6(377)
L 190 mH

4-44)

V     280 
 cos  1  o  cos  1   149.8
 3Vm   3 2  280  
 
300V  280V
Io  40 A
0.5
Pdc Vdc I o  300   40  12,000 W supplied

PR I o2 R 40 2  0.5  800 W absorbed

PBridge Pac  280   40  11, 200 W absorbed

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-45)

 1.5(10)6 W . 
Pbridge 1.5 MW .; Vo    1500 V .
 1000 A. 
 V    ( 1500) 
 cos  1  o  cos  1   105.5
 3Vm   3 2(4160) 
 2
I s ,rms   1000 816 A.
 3 

4-46)

 100,000
With Pac Pbridge 100 kW absorbed, - Vo I o 100,000 or Vo 
Io

Kirchhoff's voltage law gives - Vo   I o   0.1   1000V 0

 100,000
Substituting for Vo ,   0.1I o  1000 0
Io

0.1I o2  1000 I o  100,000 0 yields the two roots Io 9,890 A or 101 A

Choose Io 101 A because this solution results in lower I o2 losses.

Vo  1000V  I o  0.1   1000   0.1 101  989.9 V

3Vm
Vo  cos  , where Vm  2 12,500  N 2 / N1  

V     989.9 
 cos  1  o  cos 1
 
 3Vm   3 2  12,500  N 2 / N1   
   
N 2 / N1 1 will theoretically work, but  = 93.36 , but the harmonic content will be large.

A better solution would be to choose N 2 / N1 to be perhaps 1/10 (step-down). Then  = 125.9

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

V6
From Fig. 4-21, 0.3
Vm

Vm  2  12,500  N 2 / N1    2  12,500 / 10  1768 V

V6 0.3Vm 0.3  1768  530V

I o 2 I 6 0.5I o 0.5  101 5.05 A  I 6 2.525 A

V 530
Z6  6  210   R  j L  0.1  j 377 L 377 L
I 6 2.525

210
L 0.56 H
377

_____________________________________________________________________________________

4-47)

a) Vo1 
3Vm, L  L
cos(1 ) 

3 230 2  cos(45 ) 329.5 kV
 

Vo 2 
3Vm, L  L
cos( 2 ) 

3 230 2  cos(134.4 )  326 kV
 
V V 329.5kV  326kV
I o  o1 o 2  231 A
R 15
P1 Vo1 I o 76.17 MW

P2 Vo 2 I o  75.37 MW

b) Pline I o2 R 800 kW

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-48)

3Vm
a) Vm 230 2 kV ; Vo  cos( )

Vo,max  

3Vm 3 230 2 
325.3 kV
 
V  
Let Vo 2  300 kV (arbitrarily ); Then  2 cos  1  o 2  164.98
 3Vm 
P  80 MW
Io  2  267 A (linecurrent )
Vo 2  300 kW

Vo1 I o R  Vo 2 267(12)  (  300kV ) 303.2 kV

Pline I o2 R 853 kW

_____________________________________________________________________________________

4-49)

3Vm
a) Vm 345 2 kV ; Vo  cos( )

Vo,max  

3Vm 3 345 2 
465.9 kV
 
V  
Let Vo 2  425kV (arbitrarily ); Then  2 cos  1  o 2  155.8
 3Vm 
P  300MW
Io  2  706 A (linecurrent )
Vo 2  425kW

Vo1 I o R  Vo 2 706(20)  ( 425kV ) 439.1kV

Pline I o2 R 9.97 MW

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-50)

8 A.  I o 12 A.
 2V 
Vo  m  cos  I o R; Vo1 8(8) 64 V .; Vo 2 12(8) 96 V .
  
 64 
120  volt source : 1 cos  1   53.7
 2 2(120) 
V
From Fig . 4  12, 2 0.73  V2 124 V .
Vm
 96 
 2 cos  1   27.3
 2 2(120) 
V
From Fig . 4  12, 2 0.54  V2 92 V .
Vm
V 124
using V2 124 V . for 1 and I o  2.5 A., Z 2  2  99 
I 2 2.5 / 2
Z2 99
Z 2  R  j 20 L  L   0.13 H
20 2(377)
For the 240  volt source,
 64 
1 cos  1   72.8
 2 2(240) 
V
From Fig . 4  12, 2 0.83  V2 280 V .
Vm
 96 
 2 cos  1   63.6
 2 2  240  
 
V
From Fig . 4  12, 2 0.78  V2 265 V .
Vm
V 280
using V2 280 V . for 1 and I o  2.5 A., Z 2  2  224 
I 2 2.5 / 2
Z2 244
Z 2  R  j 20 L 20 L  L   0.3 H
20 2(377)
The 120-volt source requires a smaller filter inductor.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|5469992

4-51)

Io =15A in a 20- resistor. I o = 0.1(Io ) = 1.5 A.

First solution using the single-phase 480-V source with a controlled bridge rectifier:

V 
 cos  1  o  46
 2Vm 
I o 2 I 2  I 2 1.5 / 2 0.75 A

From Fig. 4-12, V2 /Vm 0.71  V2 0.71 2  480  482V

V 482
Z2  2  643   R  jn L  20  j 2  377  L
I 2 0.75

642
2  377  L 643  L  851 mH
2  377 

Second solution using the three-phase 480-V source with a controlled 6-pulse bridge rectifier:

 V   300 
 cos  1  o 1
 cos   62.4
 3V  3 2  480  
 m,L  L   
I o 2 I 6  I 6 1.5 / 2 0.75 A

From Fig. 4-12, V6 /Vm 0.28  V6 0.28 2  480  190V

V 190
Z6  6  253   R  jn L  20  j  6  377 L
I 6 0.75

253
6  377  L 253  L  112 mH
6  377 

Uncontrolled rectifiers with additional resistances added can also satisfy the specifications.
However, adding resistance would increase power loss and decrease efficiency.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Descargado por Robin Eduard ([email protected])

You might also like