0% found this document useful (0 votes)
111 views

1 Level:: 2.1 Material Properties

This document contains the results of a structural analysis of a reinforced concrete beam. The analysis found that the beam's capacity for bending and shear was insufficient and did not meet code requirements. It also identified issues with the beam's reinforcement ratios, cover depths, and transverse reinforcement spacing and shape. The analysis provided bending moments, shear forces, strains, stresses, required reinforcement areas, and deflection results for the beam.

Uploaded by

Ali Al-Basha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
111 views

1 Level:: 2.1 Material Properties

This document contains the results of a structural analysis of a reinforced concrete beam. The analysis found that the beam's capacity for bending and shear was insufficient and did not meet code requirements. It also identified issues with the beam's reinforcement ratios, cover depths, and transverse reinforcement spacing and shape. The analysis provided bending moments, shear forces, strains, stresses, required reinforcement areas, and deflection results for the beam.

Uploaded by

Ali Al-Basha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

1 Level:

·0 Name :
·1 Reference level : 4.20 (m)
·2 Maximum cracking : 0.40 (mm)
·3 Exposure : X0
·4 Concrete creep coefficient : jp = 2.98
·5 Cement class :N
·6 Concrete age (loading moment) : 28 (days)
·7 Concrete age : 50 (years)
·8 Concrete age after erecting a structure : 365 (years)
·9 Structure class : S1
·10 Fire resistance class : no requirements
·11 FFB Recommendations 7.4.3(7) : 0.00

2 Beam: Beam95 Number: 1


2.1 Material properties:

·12 Concrete : C25/30 fck =


25.00 (MPa)
Rectangular stress distribution
[3.1.7(3)]
Density : 2501.36 (kG/m3)
Aggregate size : 20.0 (mm)
·13 Longitudinal reinforcement: : B500C fyk =
500.00 (MPa)
Horizontal branch of the stress-
strain diagram
Ductility class : C
·14 Transversal reinforcement: : B500C fyk =
500.00 (MPa)
Horizontal branch of the stress-
strain diagram
Ductility class : C
·15 Additional reinforcement: : B500C fyk =
500.00 (MPa)
Horizontal branch of the stress-
strain diagram

2.2 Geometry:
2.2.1 Span Position L.supp. L R.supp.
(m) (m) (m)
P1 Span 0.50 4.67 0.50
Span length: Lo = 5.17 (m)
Section from 0.00 to 4.67 (m)
25.0 x 25.0 (cm)
without left slab
without right slab

2.3 Calculation options:

·16 Regulation of combinations : EN 1990:2002


·17 Calculations according to : EN 1992-1-
1:2004 AC:2008
·18 Seismic dispositions : No
requirements
·19 Precast beam : no
·20 Cover : bottom
c = 4.0 (cm)
: side c1= 4.0 (cm)
: top c2= 4.0 (cm)
·21 Cover deviations: Cdev = 1.0(cm), Cdur =
0.0(cm)
·22 Coefficient b2 =0.50 : long-term or cyclic
load
·23 Method of shear calculations : strut
inclination

2.4 Calculation results:


Capacity design. Capacity for bending in ULS is not sufficient for span No. 1 Safety
factor: 0.97
Detailing condition. Transverse reinforcement spacing does not satisfy maximum
spacing requirements. Span no. 1 Safety factor: 0.75
Capacity design. Capacity for bending in SLS is not sufficient for span No. 1 Safety
factor: 0.70
Capacity design.(QPR)Capacity for bending in SLS is not sufficient for span No. 1
Safety factor: 0.60
Environment condition. Cover does not satisfy environment requirement.
Detailing condition. Inadmissible shape of the transverse reinforcement.
Detailing condition. Reinforcement ratio exceeds available value.
2.4.1 Internal forces in ULS

Span Mt max. Mt min. Ml Mr Ql Qr


(kN*m) (kN*m) (kN*m) (kN*m) (kN) (kN)
P1 115.54 -17.33 -17.33 115.54 -3.26 35.31
-1 5 0
[k N * m ]
-1 0 0

-5 0

50

100
[m ]
150
0 1 2 3 4 5
B e n d in g M o m e n t U L S : M Mr Mt Mc

250
200 [k N ]
150
100
50
0
-5 0
-1 0 0
-1 5 0
-2 0 0 [m ]
-2 5 0
0 1 2 3 4 5
S h e a r F o rc e U L S : V Vr V c ( s tir r u p s ) V c ( to ta l)

2.4.2 Internal forces in SLS

Span Mt max. Mt min. Ml Mr Ql Qr


(kN*m) (kN*m) (kN*m) (kN*m) (kN) (kN)
P1 82.27 -12.34 -12.34 82.27 -2.23 25.09
-6 0
[k N * m ]
-4 0
-2 0
0
20
40
60
80 [m ]
100
0 1 2 3 4 5
B e n d in g M o m e n t S L S : M _r M r_ r M c_r M c_qp M _qp M r_ q p

60
[k N ]
50
40
30
20
10
0
-1 0 [m ]
-2 0
0 1 2 3 4 5
S h e a r F o rc e S L S : V_r V r_ r V_qp V r_ q p

1
[0 .1 % ]
0 .5

- 0 .5

-1

- 1 .5

-2
[m ]
- 2 .5
0 1 2 3 4 5
S tr a i n s : At Ac B

200
[M P a ]
100

-1 0 0

-2 0 0

-3 0 0
[m ]
-4 0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5
S tr e s s e s : A ts A cs Bs

2.4.3 Required reinforcement area

Span Span (cm2) Left support (cm2) Right support (cm2)


bottom top bottom top bottom top
P1 42.05 36.52 0.47 2.14 42.05 36.52
40
[c m 2 ]
30
20
10
0
10
20
30
40 [m ]
50
0 1 2 3 4 5
R e i n fo r c e m e n t A r e a fo r B e n d i n g : Abt Abr A b m in Ades A v e r_ g ro s s

40
[ c m 2 /m ]
30
20
10
0
10
20
30 [m ]
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
R e i n fo r c e m e n t A r e a fo r S h e a r : Ast Asr AsH ang
2.4.4 Deflection and cracking

wt(QP) Total due to quasi-permanent combination


wt(QP)dop Allowable due to quasi-permanent combination
Dwt(QP) Deflection increment from the quasi-permanent load combination after erecting a
structure.
Dwt(QP)dop Admissible deflection increment from the quasi-permanent load combination
after erecting a structure.

wk - width of perpendicular cracks

Span wt(QP) wt(QP)dop Dwt(QP) Dwt(QP)dop wk


(cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) (mm)
P1 0.1 2.1 0.0 1.0 0.3

2.5 Theoretical results - detailed results:


2.5.1 P1 : Span from 0.50 to 5.17 (m)
ULS SLS
Abscissa M max. M min. M max. M min. A bottom A top A compressive
(m) (kN*m) (kN*m) (kN*m) (kN*m) (cm2) (cm2) (cm2)
0.50 3.99 -17.33 2.76 -12.34 0.47 2.14 0.00
0.77 3.55 -15.29 2.28 -10.06 0.41 1.86 0.00
1.28 2.23 -15.74 1.38 -10.96 0.26 1.96 0.00
1.80 0.39 -17.33 0.00 -12.34 0.05 2.23 0.00
2.32 0.00 -17.33 0.00 -12.34 0.00 2.24 0.00
2.84 3.20 -17.33 0.00 -12.34 0.38 2.16 0.00
3.35 23.34 -4.20 11.68 -0.67 3.04 0.51 0.00
3.87 59.19 -0.20 37.18 0.00 11.19 8.74 8.74
4.39 91.70 -0.00 62.74 0.00 25.61 20.89 20.89
4.90 109.95 -6.57 75.87 0.00 36.54 31.25 31.25
5.17 115.54 -17.33 82.27 -12.34 42.05 36.52 36.52

ULS SLS
Abscissa V max. V max. afp
(m) (kN) (kN) (mm)
0.50 -3.26 -2.23 0.1
0.77 -3.62 -2.49 0.0
1.28 -18.02 -12.76 0.1
1.80 -18.72 -13.27 0.2
2.32 -13.52 -9.49 0.2
2.84 -15.52 -10.97 0.2
3.35 73.60 52.41 0.0
3.87 71.59 50.94 0.1
4.39 38.36 27.33 0.2
4.90 36.35 25.85 0.3
5.17 35.31 25.09 0.2

2.6 Reinforcement:
2.6.1 P1 : Span from 0.50 to 5.17 (m)
Longitudinal reinforcement:
·24 bottom (B500C)
4 f16 l = 5.50 from 0.26 to 5.63
4 f16 l = 2.92 from 2.78 to 5.58
2 f16 l = 1.68 from 5.61 to 5.61
2 f16 l = 1.67 from 5.61 to 5.61
2 f16 l = 5.63 from 5.65 to 0.02
1 f6 l = 1.65 from 1.67 to 0.02
1 f6 l = 1.86 from 5.65 to 5.65
1 f6 l = 2.34 from 4.00 to 1.67
·25 support (B500C)
4 f16 l = 5.72 from 0.04 to 5.63
4 f16 l = 2.37 from 3.34 to 5.58
1 f16 l = 2.41 from 5.61 to 5.61
1 f16 l = 2.41 from 5.56 to 5.56
2 f6 l = 6.06 from 5.66 to 0.02
1 f6 l = 1.65 from 0.02 to 1.67
1 f6 l = 1.86 from 4.00 to 3.78
Transversal reinforcement:
·26 main (B500C)
stirrups 37 f6 l = 0.78
e = 20*0.14 + 10*0.10 + 7*0.12 (m)
20 f6 l = 0.94
e = 1*0.00 + 19*0.25 (m)

pins 74 f6 l = 0.29
e = 20*0.14 + 10*0.10 + 7*0.12 (m)

3 Material survey:
·27 Concrete volume = 0.35 (m3)
·28 Formwork = 4.13 (m2)

·29 Steel B500C


·30 Total weight = 160.29 (kG)
·31 Density = 452.24 (kG/m3)
·32 Average diameter = 11.0 (mm)
·33 Survey according to diameters:
Diameter Length Weight NumberTotal weight
(mm) (m) (kG) (No.) (kG)
6 0.29 0.06 74 4.74
6 0.78 0.17 37 6.39
6 0.94 0.21 20 4.18
6 1.65 0.37 2 0.73
6 1.86 0.41 2 0.82
6 2.34 0.52 1 0.52
6 6.06 1.35 2 2.69
16 1.68 2.65 4 10.58
16 2.37 3.74 4 14.95
16 2.41 3.81 2 7.62
16 2.92 4.62 4 18.47
16 5.50 8.68 4 34.73
16 5.63 8.89 2 17.78
16 5.72 9.03 4 36.11

You might also like