Scribd
Upload
18 views

Elite Trail

The document summarizes results from several comparison trials between the G5/1 and Elite spinning frames. Key metrics like count, strength, imperfections and production rates were measured and compared for both frames across multiple trials. Overall, the Elite frame performed better with higher strength, lower imperfections and higher production rates than the G5/1 frame.

Uploaded by

venkatspinner
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
18 views

Elite Trail

The document summarizes results from several comparison trials between the G5/1 and Elite spinning frames. Key metrics like count, strength, imperfections and production rates were measured and compared for both frames across multiple trials. Overall, the Elite frame performed better with higher strength, lower imperfections and higher production rates than the G5/1 frame.

Uploaded by

venkatspinner
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

COMPARISON STUDY BETEWEEN G5/1 AND ELITE FRAME

TRIAL NO .4.
G5/1 COPSG5/1 CONE
ELITE COPS
ELITE CONE
COUNT AT 65% RH.
50.4
50.2
STRENGTH IN LBS53.3
59.8
CORR.CSP 2685
3005
COUNT CV% 1.8
1.6
STRENGTH CV% 5
5.4
UNEVENNESS %10.76
11.14
10.51
10.6
IMPERFECTIONS
2
THIN
4
7
33
3
THICK
49
60
80
36
NEPS
105
179
115
81
TOTAL
158
246
120
RKM
17.76
CV%
10.22
ELONGATION 5.23
CV%
10.06
CLASSIMATE ALL
REM
ALL
REM
RAW MATE:FAULT325
270.7
301.8
256
DRAFTING FAULT18.2
0.7
18
OBJ : FAULT. 13.7
22.9
LONG THICK 4.2
4.2
LONG THIN 38.2
34
35
33
21.2
29.3
8 CLASS OBJA4+B4+C2+D2
CLEARER CUTS
NEPS
0.1
0.9
SHORT THICK 48.8
57.2
LONG THICK 6.5
4.5
THIN
1
2.8
TOTAL
56.6
65.7

COMPARRISON STUDY BETEWEEN G5/1 AND ELITE FRAME


ELITE TRIAL NO.5.
COUNT : 50/1 CW
RING FRAME NO. 61(ELITE)
TRAVELLER CHANGED ON :21/11/2000
COTS BUFFING DATE :19/10/2000
TPI
:28.4.
Gms /SPDL /8 HOURS :75.9 gms.
COMBER NOILS
:16%.
AVERAGE SPEED
: 15918 rpm.

LAPPET HOOK
: 3.5 MM
TRAVELLER
:10/O C1 SL DR.
TRAVELLER CLEARER SETTING :1.8 MM
SPACER
:2.75 MM
ROVING GUIDE
:3.0 MM

STEPS

LENGTH

SPEED

A0
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
A6
A7
A8
A9
A 10
A 11
A 12
A 13

0
32
68
115
177
239
301
450
600
800
1100
4148
4233
4238

9,900
10,620
11,430
12,600
13,500
14,400
14,850
15,300
15,750
16,200
16,320
16,200
15,300
0

COP CONTENT :50 gms


TOTAL LENGTH : 4238 mtr
AVG.SPEED :15918 rpm

COMPARISON STUDY BETEWEEN G5/1 AND ELITE FRAME


TRIAL NO .3.
G5/1 COPSG5/1 CONE
ELITE COPS
ELITE CONE
COUNT AT 65% RH.
50.3
49.9
STRENGTH IN LBS56.7
67.3
CORR.CSP 2852
3358
COUNT CV%
1
1.3
STRENGTH CV% 3.4
4.3
UNEVENNESS %10.3
10.7
10.4
10.4
IMPERFECTIONS
THIN
2
2
2
3
THICK
29
36
26
31
NEPS
69
82
70
64
TOTAL
90
120
98
98
RKM
18.3
17
21.6
21.1
CV%
9.6
8.1
9
8.9
ELONGATION 5.5
4.4
5.5
4.7
CV%
12.9
9.2
10.2
10.2
CLASSIMATE ALL
REM
ALL
REM
RAW MATE:FAULT
159.4
128.9
224.5
182.2
DRAFTING FAULT12.5
0.2
13.7
0.7
OBJ : FAULT. 10.6
0
8.2
0
LONG THICK 4.4
0
4.7
0
LONG THIN
21
17
31
23
11.8
0
8.9
0
8 CLASS OBJA4+B4+C2+D2
CLEARER CUTS
NEPS
0
0.2
SHORT THICK 6.4
6
LONG THICK 31.9
30.4
THIN
0.4
0.8
TOTAL
38.8
37.6

COMPARISON STUDY BETEWEEN G5/1 AND ELITE FRAME


TRIAL NO .5.
G5/1 COPSG5/1 CONE
ELITE COPS
ELITE CONE
COUNT AT 65% RH.
50.4
50.86
STRENGTH IN LBS53.3
57.22
CORR.CSP 2685
2910
COUNT CV% 1.8
1.5
STRENGTH CV% 5
7.2
UNEVENNESS %10.76
11.14
10.73
10.88
IMPERFECTIONS
THIN
4
7
3
5

THICK
49
NEPS
105
TOTAL
158
RKM
17.76
CV%
10.22
ELONGATION 5.23
CV%
10.06
CLASSIMATE ALL
RAW MATE:FAULT325
DRAFTING FAULT18.2
OBJ : FAULT. 13.7
LONG THICK 4.2
LONG THIN 38.2
21.2
8 CLASS OBJA4+B4+C2+D2
CLEARER CUTS
NEPS
0.1
SHORT THICK 48.8
LONG THICK 6.5
THIN
1
TOTAL
56.6

60
179
246

REM
270.7
0.7
34
-

42
88
133
18.8
10.8
5.21
8.25
ALL
255.5
22.2
20.2
17.7
26.2
28.4
0.6
55.4
6.5
1.3
64

43
105
153
18.93
8.14
5.3
8.58
REM
198.7
1.5
20
-

COMPARISON STUDY BETEWEEN G5/1 AND ELITE FRAME


TRIAL NO .2
G5/1 COPSG5/1 CONE
ELITE COPS
ELITE CONE
COUNT AT 65% RH.
50.3
49.7
STRENGTH IN LBS56.7
62.9
CORR.CSP 2852
3129
COUNT CV%
1
1.6
STRENGTH CV% 3.4
4.9
UNEVENNESS %10.3
10.7
10.2
10.2
IMPERFECTIONS
THIN
2
2
1
1
THICK
29
36
24
22
NEPS
69
82
58
52
TOTAL
90
120
83
75
RKM
18.3
17
20.2
20.5
CV%
9.6
8.1
7.4
9.5
ELONGATION 5.5
4.4
4.8
4.7
CV%
12.9
9.2
8.7
10.2
CLASSIMATE ALL
REM
ALL
REM
RAW MATE:FAULT
159.4
128.9
218.8
171.7
DRAFTING FAULT12.5
0.2
17.7
0.5
OBJ : FAULT. 10.6
0
17.1
0
LONG THICK 4.4
0
8.9
0
LONG THIN
21
17
36
21
11.8
0
18.5
0
8 CLASS OBJA4+B4+C2+D2
CLEARER CUTS
NEPS
0
0.7
SHORT THICK 6.4
8.3
LONG THICK 31.9
49.6
THIN
0.4
0.4
TOTAL
38.8
59.4

COMPARISON STUDY BETEWEEN G5/1 AND ELITE FRAME


TRIAL NO .2
G5/1 COPSG5/1 CONE
ELITE COPS
ELITE CONE
COUNT AT 65% RH.
50.3
49.7
STRENGTH IN LBS56.7
62.9
CORR.CSP 2852
3129
COUNT CV%
1
1.6
STRENGTH CV% 3.4
4.9
UNEVENNESS %10.3
10.7
10.2
10.2
IMPERFECTIONS
THIN
2
2
1
1
THICK
29
36
24
22
NEPS
69
82
58
52

TOTAL
90
RKM
18.3
CV%
9.6
ELONGATION 5.5
CV%
12.9
CLASSIMATE ALL
RAW MATE:FAULT
159.4
DRAFTING FAULT12.5
OBJ : FAULT. 10.6
LONG THICK 4.4
LONG THIN
21
11.8
8 CLASS OBJA4+B4+C2+D2
CLEARER CUTS
NEPS
0
SHORT THICK 6.4
LONG THICK 31.9
THIN
0.4
TOTAL
38.8

120
17
8.1
4.4
9.2
REM
128.9
0.2
0
0
17
0

83
20.2
7.4
4.8
8.7
ALL
218.8
17.7
17.1
8.9
36
18.5
0.7
8.3
49.6
0.4
59.4

75
20.5
9.5
4.7
10.2
REM
171.7
0.5
0
0
21
0

You might also like