0% found this document useful (0 votes)
205 views

Egalitatea de Resurse: Ronald Dworkin

Ronald Dworkin was a prominent legal and political philosopher known for his work on equality and distributive justice. He argued for an egalitarian view called "equality of resources" which holds that inequalities are just if they arise from people's free choices but not from factors outside their control like innate talents or brute luck. Dworkin proposed theoretical mechanisms like an auction system and insurance markets to transform brute luck into option luck and justify resulting inequalities. His view generated significant discussion and debate among philosophers on the nature and limits of equality.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
205 views

Egalitatea de Resurse: Ronald Dworkin

Ronald Dworkin was a prominent legal and political philosopher known for his work on equality and distributive justice. He argued for an egalitarian view called "equality of resources" which holds that inequalities are just if they arise from people's free choices but not from factors outside their control like innate talents or brute luck. Dworkin proposed theoretical mechanisms like an auction system and insurance markets to transform brute luck into option luck and justify resulting inequalities. His view generated significant discussion and debate among philosophers on the nature and limits of equality.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Ronald Dworkin

Egalitatea de
resurse
Egalitatea ca valoare
liberala
• “Tabula rasa”
• Resursism sofisticat
• Originea ideii de loterie sociala si loterie naturala ca
motiv pentru a extinde taramul egalitatii de
oportunitate catre egalitatea echitabila de oportunitate
– John Rawls “A Theory of Justice”
• Egalitarismul norcului (“luck egalitarianism): idee
conform careia inegalitatile relevante din punct de
vedere moral sunt cele care apar in urma interventiei
imprevizibile si nedorite a norocului in vietile oamenilor.
Egalitatea de bunastare

Obiectii ce tin de sacrificarea


eficientei:

- Leveling-down (nivelarea
catre minim);
- Bottomless pit (groapa fara
fund).
Egalitatea de
resurse
Scenariul contrafactual al
insulei contine o
argumentatie in 3 pasi:

• Adoptarea testului invidiei


• Introducerea si justificarea
mecanismului licitatiei
• Introducerea si justificarea
mecanismului asigurarilor
Transformarea norocului brut in
noroc de optiune - asigurarile
• Noroc de optiune
• Noroc brut:
- handicapuri
- talente
- intemperii naturale
Concluzii

- taxe si
impozite
- piata de
asigurari
• Gerald Cohen (1989);
• Elizabeth Anderson (1999);
• Kasper Lippert Rasmussen (2001);
Critici
• Joseph Heath (2005)– Kelvin Lancaster
& Richard Lipsey;
• Richard Arneson (1989);
Recomandari de lectura:
• Anderson, Elizabeth S. 1999. “What Is the Point of Equality?”, Ethics 109, pp. 287-337;
• Arneson, R. 2006., “Luck Egalitarianism Interpreted and Defended”, Philosophical Topics, 32 (1), pp.1-20
• Arneson, Richard “Rawls, Responsibility, and Distributive Justice,” in Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism: Themes
from Harsanyi and Rawls, ed. Maurice Salles and John A. Weymark (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press);
• Arneson, Richard 1989. “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare,” Philosophical Studies 56, pp. 77-93;
• Cohen, G.A. 1989. “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice”, Ethics, 99 (4), pp. 906-944;
• Dworkin, Ronald. 2011, Justice for Hedgehogs, Belknap Press, Cambridge;
• Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign Virtue. The Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge London: Harvard University Press;
• Dworkin, Ronald. 2002, “Sovereign Virtue Revisited”, Ethics, 113 (1), pp.106-143;
• Dworkin, Ronald. 2003, “Equality, Luck and Hierarchy”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31(2), pp. 190-198;
• Heath, Joseph, 2005. “Dworkin’s Auction”, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3, pp.313-335;
• Kasper Lippert‐Rasmussen, 2001, “Egalitarianism, Option Luck, and Responsibility,” Ethics 111 (3), pp. 548-579.
• Lipsey, Richard. Lancaster, Kelvin. 1956. “The General Theory of the Second Best”, Review of Economic Studies 24, pp. 11–32;
• Otsuka, M. 2002, “Luck, Insurance, and Equality”, Ethics, 113 (1), pp.40-54;
• Rawls, John. 1971 [1999]., A Theory of Justice (revised edition), Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts;

You might also like