The document discusses Contingency Theory in leadership, which posits that a leader's effectiveness is contingent upon the match between their leadership style and the situational context. It outlines different leadership styles, situational variables, and the LPC scale used to measure leadership effectiveness. The theory has both pros, such as empirical support and predictive capabilities, and cons, including limitations in explaining leader effectiveness and clarity issues with the LPC scale.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views
Contingency Theory latest
The document discusses Contingency Theory in leadership, which posits that a leader's effectiveness is contingent upon the match between their leadership style and the situational context. It outlines different leadership styles, situational variables, and the LPC scale used to measure leadership effectiveness. The theory has both pros, such as empirical support and predictive capabilities, and cons, including limitations in explaining leader effectiveness and clarity issues with the LPC scale.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12
Leadership Power and Influence
CHAPTER 5 Contingency Theory to Leadership Faculty Member:
Dr. Md. Musharrof Hossain
(Recipient of lifetime HR Achievement and
Global HR Excellence Awards) Overview Contingency Theory Approach Perspective Leadership Styles Situational Variables Research Findings of Leader Style Effectiveness How Does the Approach Work? Contingency Theory • This is a leader match theory because it tries to match leaders to appropriate situations • A leader’s effectiveness depends on how well the leader’s style fits the context • The theory was developed by studying the styles of leaders in situations and whether they were effective (primarily in military organizations) • Concerned with styles and situations Contingency Theory • Leadership styles are either task motivated or relationship motivated • Situations have three factors: leader-member relations, task structure and position power LPC Scale • Used to measure a person’s leadership style • For example, it measures your style by having you describe a coworker with whom you had difficulty completing a job. (not necessarily someone you dislike, but someone with whom you least like to work with) • After you choose this person, the LPC instrument asks you to describe your coworker on 18 sets of adjectives Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) Scale Pleasant 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unpleasant Friendly 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unfriendly Rejecting 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Accepting Tense 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Relaxed Cold 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Warm Supportive 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Hostile Boring 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Interesting Quarrelsome 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Harmonious Gloomy 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Cheerful Open 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Closed Backbiting 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Loyal Untrustworthy 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Trustworthy Considerate 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Inconsiderate Nasty 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Nice Agreeable 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Disagreeable Insincere 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Sincere Kind 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unkind Scoring • Your final score is the total of the numbers you circled on the 18 scales 57 or less = Low LPC (task motivated) 58-63 = Middle LPC (socio-independent leaders, self directed and not overly concerned with the task or with how others view them) 64 or above = High LPC (motivated by relationships) Contingency Theory • How it works By measuring a leader’s LPC score and three situational variables, one can predict whether the leader is going to be successful in a particular setting. It is important to note that contingency theory stresses that leaders are NOT successful in all situations. Contingency Theory Pros • Empirical research supports this theory • Includes the impact of situations on leaders • This theory is predictive and therefore provides useful information about the type of leadership that is most likely to be successful in a specific context • Does not require people to be successful in all situations (perfection is not required) • Data from this theory could be useful to organizations in developing leadership profiles Contingency Theory Cons • Fails to fully explain why people with certain leadership styles are more effective in situations than others • Questions regarding the LPC scale have been made because it does not correlate well with other standard leadership measures. • LPC instructions are not clear – leaders are unsure how to choose a least preferred coworker • Also fails to explain what to do when there is a mismatch between the leader and the situation in the workplace Research Findings of Leader Style Effectiveness
• Reasons for leader mismatch ineffectiveness:
Leader style doesn’t match a particular situation; stress and anxiety result Under stress, leader reverts to less mature coping style learned in earlier development Leader’s less mature coping style results in poor decision making and consequently negative work outcomes Thank you