BASIC SUCCESSION-Reviewer
BASIC SUCCESSION-Reviewer
6. Either by his will or by operation of law (means Juan, a Filipino businessman, passes away,
of transfer) leaving behind an estate worth ₱1,000,000.
However, he also has outstanding debts amounting
to ₱2,000,000. Pedro is his only son.
Succession as a mode of acquisition. Pedro inherits Juan's estate, which is worth
Succession is the legal process where the assets, ₱1,000,000. The creditors demand full payment of
rights, and obligations of a deceased person are the ₱2,000,000 debt. Under Philippine law, Pedro is
transferred to his/her heirs. not personally liable for the excess debt beyond
what he inherited. He is only obligated to pay up to
Succession is a mode acquiring, rights or obligation ₱1,000,000 (the value of the inheritance).
to the other person to the extent of the value of
inheritance transmitted by a person after his death. The remaining ₱1,000,000 in unpaid debt is
It could be by means of will or by operation of law. extinguished because heirs are not liable beyond
(art.774) the value of the inheritance.
1
Devisee and legatees are persons to whom gifts of Art. 776- The inheritance includes all the property,
real and personal property are respectively given rights and obligations of a person which are not
by virtue of a will. extinguished by his death.
Art. 781-The inheritance of a person includes not
only the property and the transmissible rights and
Transmitted through his death obligations existing at the time of his death, but also
Succession can only commence from the time of those which have accrued thereto since the
the death of the person (decedent) who transmitted opening of the succession.
his property.(art.777)
(1) If a person dies without a will, or with a void will, 4. Either by a will or by operation of law.
or one which has subsequently lost its validity;
(2) When the will does not institute an heir to, or INHERITANCE-Art. 776
dispose of all the property belonging to the testator.
In such a case the legal succession shall take place “The inheritance includes all the property, rights
only with respect to the property of which the and obligations of a person which are not
testator has not disposed; extinguished by his death”
(3) If the suspensive condition attached to the Inheritance includes:
institution of heir does not happen or is not fulfilled,
of if the heir dies before the testator, or repudiates 1. All property,
the inheritance, there being no substitution, and no 2. Rights
right of accretion takes place.
3. Obligations of a person
(4) When the heir instituted is incapable of
succeeding, except in cases provided in this Code. 4. Which are not extinguished by his death
Example: Property
B. SUCCESSION VS. INHERITANCE Real property
Succession-Art.774- A mode of acquisition, by 1. Land
virtue of which, the property, rights and obligation,
2. House and lot
to the extent on the value of inheritance, is
transmitted to other or another, either by will or by 3. Buildings
operation of law.
4. Agricultural land
Inheritance- Art. 776 in relation to Art. 781
5. Condominiums
2
Personal property Type Description Example
4. Furniture and appliances Compulsory Reserved inheritance for A child automatically inherits
Succession compulsory heirs even if excluded from the will
5. Stocks, bonds, and other financial investments
Voluntary Based on the testator’s A person leaves assets to a
Rights Succession wishes in a will close friend
4
Rental Income – Maria's rental properties continue Subsection 1-Wills in General
to generate income even after her death. Any rent
collected after January 1, 2024 is also part of the WILL-Art. 783
inheritance. “A will is an act whereby a person is permitted, with
Bank Interest – The ₱1,000,000 in Maria’s bank the formalities prescribed by law, to control to a
account accrues interest. Any interest earned after certain degree the disposition of this estate, to take
her death is also included in her estate. effect after his death”
SECTION 1- WILLS
5
It is a unilateral legal act of a person who wishes A testator may establish a trust in their will,
to dispose of their property in a specific manner appointing a trustee to manage assets for the
after death. benefit of heirs. This enables them to control to a
certain degree the disposition of the estate,
ensuring that funds are used for specific purposes
Whereby a person is permitted with formalities such as education or medical needs.
prescribed by law Example: Partition by Will (Article 1080, Civil
Used to describe legal acts that an individual can Code)
perform only if they comply with the necessary legal A person making a will may specify how their estate
requirements. should be divided among heirs, exercising their
Example: right to control to a certain degree the disposition of
their estate while ensuring the legal shares of
Juan Dela Cruz, a 65-year-old Filipino compulsory heirs are upheld.
businessman, wishes to distribute his estate upon
his death.
Under Article 783 of the Civil Code, he is permitted To take effect after his death
to make a will, but he must follow the formalities Applies to legal acts, such as wills, life insurance
prescribed by law for it to be valid. policies, and certain donations, that do not become
legally enforceable until the person who made them
passes away.
To control to a certain degree the disposition
of this estate Juan Dela Cruz creates a will, stating that his
house and lot shall go to his wife, his car to his son,
This means that while a person can decide how to and his bank savings to his daughter. Since a will is
distribute their property through a will or legal a legal act that only operates to take effect after his
arrangement, Philippine law places limitations, death, his heirs will only acquire ownership of their
particularly to protect compulsory heirs and uphold respective inheritances once Juan passes away
legal inheritance rights. and the will undergoes probate.
Example: Disposition of estate limited by
legitimes (Article 886, Civil Code)
WILL IS PERSONAL ACT- Art. 784
Juan Dela Cruz, a Filipino citizen, has an estate
consisting of a house and lot, bank savings, and a “The making of a will is strictly personal act; it
car. He wants to decide who will inherit his cannot be left in whole or in part to the discretion of
properties after his death. a third person, or accomplished through the
instrumentality of an agent or attorney”
Juan executes a will, allowing him to control to a
certain degree the disposition of his estate. While Elements
he can distribute his properties according to his 1. Making of a will is strictly personal act,
wishes, he must still respect the legitime
(mandatory inheritance) of his compulsory heirs, 2. Cannot be left in whole or in part to the discretion
such as his wife and children, as required by of a third person, or
Philippine succession laws.
3. Accomplished through the instrumentality of an
Example: Donation with Retained Rights (Article agent or attorney.
726 or 619r, Civil Code).
A person donating property may impose conditions
on its use, allowing them to control to a certain Making of a will is strictly personal act
degree the disposition of the estate even after A will must personally reflect the testator’s wishes
transferring ownership. and cannot be made or altered by a lawyer, agent,
Example: Trust Arrangement (Trust Law, Civil or any third party. Even though a lawyer can assist
Code Articles 1440-1449)
6
in drafting the document, all decisions must come Pedro Cruz, an elderly man, wants to create a will
from the testator alone. but is too weak to write or sign it himself. He tells
his lawyer, Atty. Santos, to draft his will and sign it
Juan Dela Cruz, an elderly businessman, wants to on his behalf since he is unable to do so. Atty.
distribute his estate among his children. Due to his Santos then prepares the will, decides how Pedro’s
old age, he tells his lawyer to, just draft his will and properties will be distributed, and signs the
decide how to distribute his properties fairly among document on Pedro’s behalf.
his children.
Under Article 784 of the Civil Code of the
Under Article 784 of the Civil Code, the making of a Philippines, the making of a will cannot be
will is a strictly personal act, meaning Juan cannot accomplished through the instrumentality of an
delegate the decisions about his estate to his agent or attorney. The testator must personally
lawyer or anyone else. decide, write (or dictate), and sign the will.
If Atty. Reyes writes the will and chooses how the Since Pedro's will was signed and executed by his
estate is distributed, the will is invalid because it attorney instead of him, it is invalid. Even if Pedro
violates the rule that a testator must personally had orally instructed the lawyer, the law requires
decide the contents of their will. that the testator personally execute the will
following the prescribed formalities.
Under Article 784 of the Civil Code of the 2. The determination of the portions which they are
Philippines, the making of a will cannot be left in to take,
whole or in part to the discretion of a third person. 3. When referred to by name
Since Maria did not specify how her estate should 4. Cannot be left to the discretion of a third person
be distributed and instead left the decision to Ana,
this portion of the will is invalid. The court will Under article 785 the will is valid if it complies with
disregard Ana’s discretion, and Maria’s estate will the following requisites:
be distributed according to Philippine succession
laws. 1. The testator referred to the heirs by name
2. He personally determined their respective shares
Making of a will in whole or in part cannot be 3. No third person was given discretion to decide
accomplished through the instrumentality of an on the distribution.
agent or attorney.
A testator must personally create and execute their Determination of duration or efficacy of the
will. A lawyer may assist in drafting, but the will designation of heirs, devisee or legatees, and
cannot be signed, modified, or executed by an the apportionment thereof.
agent or attorney on behalf of the testator.
Personal acts of determining duration or efficacy of
Example: Invalid will the designation of heirs, divisee or legatee, ad
7
apportioning the same when referred to by name Cannot be left to the discretion of a third
cannot be left to the discretion of a third person. person
Only the testator can designate heirs and their Example: Invalid Delegation of Inheritance
shares Distribution in a will
The testator must personally name the heirs, Carlos Reyes, a wealthy landowner, writes the
devisees, or legatees and state what portion of the following provision in his last will and testament:
estate they will receive.
"I hereby designate my three children—Andrea,
This rule ensures that a will clearly expresses the Miguel, and Tomas—as my heirs. However, I leave
testator's wishes and prevents manipulation or it to my lawyer, Atty. Santos, to decide how much
disputes by prohibiting a third party from deciding of my estate each of them will receive."
who inherits what.
Is the will valid?
Example: Invalid will
No.This provision is invalid under Article 786 of the
In his will, Juan writes: "I leave my properties to my Civil Code of the Philippines, which states that the
children, but my brother Pedro will decide how testator must personally determine the portions of
much each of them will receive.” inheritance and cannot delegate this to another
person.
This is invalid. Art. 785- which provides that the
duration or efficacy of the designation of heirs, In this case, Carlos correctly named his heirs
devisee or legatees, or the determination of the (Andrea, Miguel, and Tomas). However, he left the
portions which they are to take, when referred to by determination of their inheritance to a third person
name, cannot be left to the discretion of a third (Atty. Santos) instead of deciding their shares
person. himself.
In this case, Juan did not determine how much To comply with Philippine law, Carlos should
each of them will receive and instead left to Pedro instead write:
the determination thereof, therefore this will is
invalid. "I hereby designate my three children—Andrea,
Miguel, and Tomas—as my heirs. I bequeath my
Example: Valid will house and lot in Quezon City to Andrea, my farm in
Batangas to Miguel, and my commercial building in
Juan wrote in his will that he leave his house to his Makati to Tomas. Any remaining properties shall be
eldest son, his car to his daughter, and his bank divided equally among them."
savings to be equally divided among all his children
The testator personally designated his heirs by
This is valid. Art. 785 provides that the duration or name.
efficacy of the designation of heirs, devisee or
legatees, or the determination of the portions which He also personally determined their respective
they are to take, when referred to by name, cannot inheritance.
be left to the discretion of a third person.
No third party was given discretion to decide who
In this case, Juan personally decided and specified gets what.
each heir’s share. Thus, valid.
Under Philippine succession law (art.785), a
Under article 785 the will is valid if it complies with testator who names specific heirs must also
the following requisites: personally decide what they will inherit. They
cannot delegate this decision to a third person, as it
1. The testator referred to the heirs by name would make that portion of the will invalid.
2. He personally determined their respective Delegable act of testator- Art. 786
shares.
“The testator may entrust to a third person the
3. No third person was given discretion to decide distribution of specific property or sums of money
on the distribution. that he may leave in general to specified classes or
causes, and also the designation of the persons,
8
institutions or establishments to which such Wherein the only task of the trustee is to designate
property or sums are to be given or applied.” the beneficiary of the will after the amount was
already determined by the testator.
Elements
Art. 787-Prohibited testamentary disposition
1. Testator may entrust to third person the
distribution of specific property or sums of money “The testator may NOT make a testamentary
disposition in such a manner that another person
2. That he may leave in general to specified has to determine whether or not it is to be
classes or causes, and also the designation of the operative.”
persons, institutions or establishments
Prohibited testamentary disposition
3. To which such property or sums are to be given
or applied. Elements
Testator may entrust third person in the 1. The disposition permits another person
following task:
2. To determine whether or not the testamentary
1. Distribution of specific property or sums of disposition is operative.
money
Example: Invalid clause
1.1. That he may leave in general to specified
classes or causes, and Juan Leave ₱1,000,000 to his son, Mario, if his
brother Pedro thinks Mario deserves it.
2. Also the designation of the persons, institutions,
or establishments. This disposition is invalid because it gives Pedro
the power to determine whether or not Juan
receives the inheritance.
Entrusting a third person to distribute specific Under Article 787 of the Civil Code of the
property or sums of money is valid. Philippines, a testator may not leave a disposition
subject to the absolute discretion of another
Example: valid entrusting of third person person.
"Juan bequeath ₱1,000,000 to be distributed Example: Valid clause
among charitable organizations helping street
children. He entrusted his executor, Atty. Santos, Juan leave ₱1,000,000 to his son, Mario, provided
with the responsibility of selecting which registered that the latter completes his college degree.
charities shall receive the funds."
In this case, the condition is objective and does
Is it valid? not rely on another person’s judgment. The court or
executor can determine whether Juan fulfilled the
Yes. Art. 786 permits the testator to entrust third requirement.
person to distribute specified amount of money.
The testator does not need to name each recipient
individually—he may entrust a third person (like an
executor) to decide the distribution within the
specified class or cause.
In this case, Juan did not leave the decision of
whether to give money—he already allocated
₱1,000,000 for charity. He simply allowed a trusted
person to select which organizations qualify.
This aligns with Philippine succession laws, as long
as the executor follows the testator’s intent.