The document analyzes assessment practices observed in a classroom, highlighting the alignment between quizzes, performance tasks, and learning outcomes. It emphasizes the balance between traditional and authentic assessments, noting their effectiveness in evaluating student competencies. Recommendations for improvement include refining rubrics and enhancing time management strategies for performance tasks to better support higher-order thinking skills.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views
FS 2 ACTIVITY 8
The document analyzes assessment practices observed in a classroom, highlighting the alignment between quizzes, performance tasks, and learning outcomes. It emphasizes the balance between traditional and authentic assessments, noting their effectiveness in evaluating student competencies. Recommendations for improvement include refining rubrics and enhancing time management strategies for performance tasks to better support higher-order thinking skills.
To gain a deeper understanding of assessment practices, I reviewed a sample quiz,
Table of Specifications (TOS), Test Questionnaire (TQ), and a performance task provided by my cooperating teacher. My analysis revealed a strong alignment between these materials and the stated learning outcomes. The TOS clearly outlined the specific objectives and cognitive levels, ensuring that the quiz and TQ targeted the intended outcomes. The performance task, which required students to create a model of a simple machine in Science, effectively reflected the application of learning outcomes by engaging higher-order thinking skills such as analysis, synthesis, and creativity. This demonstrated the teacher’s effort to ensure coherence between planning, instruction, and assessment. The balance between traditional and authentic assessments was evident in the teacher’s approach. Traditional assessments like quizzes and tests were focused on lower and mid-level cognitive domains in Bloom’s Taxonomy, such as remembering and understanding. These were complemented by authentic assessments like performance tasks, which required students to apply and evaluate knowledge in real-world contexts. This balance provided a comprehensive evaluation of student competencies, from foundational understanding to complex applications. The quality of the assessment tasks was commendable, as they adhered to principles of clarity, relevance, fairness, authenticity, and practicality. Quiz items were straightforward, ensuring all students had an equal opportunity to succeed. The performance task was practical and engaging, allowing students to apply theoretical knowledge to solve a real-world problem. However, I observed that the rubric for the performance task could benefit from more specific criteria to enhance reliability and ensure consistency in scoring. Overall, the assessments demonstrated strong validity by accurately measuring the intended learning outcomes. Observing students during assessments provided further insights. Traditional assessments were met with moderate engagement, with students often treating them as routine. In contrast, authentic assessments elicited excitement and enthusiasm, as students enjoyed the opportunity to showcase their creativity and problem-solving skills. Some students, however, found the performance task challenging due to time constraints, indicating the need for better time management strategies. Performance trends showed that students excelled in tasks requiring basic knowledge but struggled when applying concepts to unfamiliar situations, highlighting the need for more practice with higher-order thinking tasks. Reflecting on these findings, I believe the teacher’s assessment practices are effective and provide a holistic measure of student learning. The combination of traditional and authentic assessments ensures a well-rounded evaluation, but there is room for improvement, particularly in refining rubrics and offering additional scaffolding for complex tasks. This experience emphasized the importance of aligning assessments with learning outcomes and designing tasks that foster critical thinking and real-world application. As a future teacher, I aim to adopt similar practices, creating assessments that are meaningful, inclusive, and reflective of diverse learning needs. Additionally, I plan to provide students with ample opportunities to practice higher-order thinking skills to support their academic and personal growth.