International Journal of

Environmental Research
and Public Health

Article
Three-Wave Longitudinal Survey on the Relationship
between Neuroticism and Depressive Symptoms of
First-Year College Students: Addictive Use of Social
Media as a Moderated Mediator
Weiqi Mu 1,2,† , Dongyun Zhu 1,2,† , Yanhong Wang 3 , Fugui Li 1,2 , Liyuan Ye 1,2 , Kexin Wang 4 and
Mingjie Zhou 1,2, *
1 CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101,
China; [email protected] (W.M.); [email protected] (D.Z.); [email protected] (F.L.);
[email protected] (L.Y.)
2 Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3 Mental Health Counseling Center, Yang’ En University, 362014 Quanzhou, China; [email protected]
4 College of Media and International Culture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310007, China;
[email protected]
* Correspondence: [email protected]
† These authors contributed equally to this work.

Received: 30 June 2020; Accepted: 18 August 2020; Published: 20 August 2020

Abstract: First-year college students’ adaptation problems and related mental health have attracted
researchers’ attention. The current research focuses on the depressive symptoms of first-year college
students and aims to explore the relationship between the neuroticism trait and depressive symptoms,
the mediating effect of addictive use of social media, and the moderating effect of psychological
resilience. Three-wave longitudinal data from 1128 first-year students at a university in Fujian
Province, China, were collected within three months of their enrollment. PROCESS macro for SPSS
with bootstrapping was used to test the model. Results showed that the prevalence of moderate
to severe severity of depressive symptoms in first-year students was 10.28% (T1) and 11.17% (T3).
Addictive use of social media (T2) plays a moderated mediator role in the relationship between
neuroticism (T1) and depressive symptoms (T3) of first-year students. Specifically, a low neuroticism
individual does not necessarily have a less addictive use of social media. Psychological resilience (T1)
moderated the above mediation. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Keywords: depressive symptoms; neuroticism; addictive use of social media; psychological resilience;
moderated mediation

1. Introduction
While college presents many students with opportunities for personal growth and enhancement,
some students find the demands of college adjustment exceed their coping resources [1]. New college
students begin their transition from adolescence to adulthood, and many of them have difficulty adapting
to college life. The worse the adaptation of first-year students, the higher the risk of psychological
disturbance [2,3]. Previous studies have shown that there is a significant correlation between depression
symptoms and suicide ideation of college students [4,5]. Therefore, the mental health of first-year college
students, especially depressive symptoms, deserves our attention. Many researches have demonstrated
the closing association between personality traits and depression, especially the role of high neuroticism
in developing depression [6–9]. Meanwhile, addictive use of social media has become an area of
increasing research interest. A large national survey in Norway has explored that being a student and

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6074; doi:10.3390/ijerph17176074 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6074 2 of 13

young is associated with a high risk of addictive use of social media [10]. Addictive use of social media
is associated with both neuroticism traits and depression [11,12]. Therefore, in this study, we aim to
provide insight into how, and under what conditions, neuroticism leads to a higher level of depressive
symptoms from the perspective of the addictive use of social media.

1.1. The Relationship between Neuroticism and Depressive Symptoms

The “Big Five” personality model (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness,
neuroticism), as the most influential personality theoretical model in the world, has been widely studied
by many psychological researchers in the past half-century and has been proved to have the relative
consistency and stability across different samples, raters, languages, and cultures [13]. The personality
trait of neuroticism refers to relatively stable tendencies to respond with negative emotions to threat,
frustration, or loss [14]. Negative emotionality is the underpinning of neuroticism [15,16]. Individual
neuroticism levels lead to differences in perception, memory, affection, and behavior during emotional
stimuli and negative events, which explains why some individuals may be better at regulating their
emotional state than others [17]. Neuroticism is significantly correlated with higher scores in depressive
symptoms and appears to be the most powerful predictor of depression [18,19].

1.2. The Relationship between Addictive Use of Social Media and Depressive Symptoms
With the development of computers and networks, people’s communication mode has gradually
shifted from reality to networks. According to the Pew Research Center, 72% of American adults use
social media as of February 2019, including 90% of young people aged 18–29 [20]. By March 2020,
the number of Internet users in China has reached 904 million, of which 99.3% are mobile Internet
users. In terms of occupation, student users account for 26.9% for the most substantial proportion.
Among all kinds of social applications, WeChat has the highest usage rate, reaching 85.1% [21].
Some studies have indicated a positive relationship between social media and mental health [22,23].
However, many others hold the opposite opinion, which shows that psychological distress is related to
maladaptive use of both the Internet and the mobile phone [24–26]. Addictive use of social media
(similar concepts include “social media use disorder”, “social network overuse”, “pathological social
network use”, “social network addiction”) has a negative impact on adolescents’ physical and mental
development [27]. Overuse of Facebook can lead to depression, according to a report from the American
Academy of Pediatrics [28]. Many studies have indicated that adolescents’ problematic social network
usage is positively correlated with depressive symptoms [29,30]. Therefore, the addictive use of social
media of first-year students is worthy of attention.

1.3. Addictive Use of Social Media as a Mediator in the Relationship between Neuroticism Trait and Depressive
Symptoms
Furthermore, previous studies showed that Facebook addiction was positively related to
neuroticism [31,32]. Individuals with high neuroticism tend to use social media more frequently [33].
Introverted and neurotic people locate their “real me” on the Internet, while extroverts and non-neurotic
people locate their “real me” through traditional social interaction [34]. Young adults high in neuroticism
are inclined to present their ideal and false self on Facebook to a greater extent [35]. High-neurotic
individuals may be more willing to seek emotional satisfaction and stress release through mobile
phones to avoid the real world [36]. Therefore, we speculate that first-year college students with high
neuroticism are more likely to be addicted to social media in the face of adaptive pressure, which will
further aggravate their risk of depression. In other words, the addictive use of social media plays
a mediating role between neuroticism and depressive symptoms.

1.4. Moderation of Psychological Resilience

Human responses to stress and trauma vary widely. Resilience is an interactive concept that refers to
a relative resistance to environmental risk experiences or the overcoming of stress or adversity [37].
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6074 3 of 13

Psychological resilience is a protective factor of individuals in time of stress [38] and can increase the
odds of not being depressed [39]. Among all independent variables, resilience is the most effective
at predicting first-year university students’ ability to adjust to university life [40]. At the same time,
psychological resilience is a critical factor in protecting adolescents from internet addiction [41].
However, considering that neuroticism is the risk factor of individuals’ addictive use of social
media, while psychological resilience may be the protective factor for addictive use of social media,
combined with the theory of the buffering effect of psychological resilience [42], this study assumes
that psychological resilience may play a moderating role between neuroticism and addictive use of
social media, namely psychological resilience may reduce the risk of addictive use of social media of
highly neurotic individuals.
To sum up, based on the relationship between neuroticism and depressive symptoms, this study
hypothesized a moderated mediation model (see Figure 1). We aimed to provide insights into how
(the mediation role of addictive use of social media), and under what conditions (the moderator role of
psychological resilience), neuroticism leads to a higher level of depressive symptoms.

Figure 1. Moderated mediation model of the present research.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants and Procedures

Data were collected at three different periods among 1428 students who began their freshman year
at a university in China, in 2017. The majors of these students include Law, Financial Management,
Accounting, Electronic Information Engineering, Journalism, Advertising, Chinese Language and
Literature, Marketing, Logistics Management, Economics, Network Engineering, English Language
and Literature, Industrial Engineering, Business Administration, International Economics and
Trade, Finance, Computer Science and Technology, and Electrical Engineering and Automation.
The participation was anonymous and voluntary, based on the invitation from a course teacher
responsible for the mental health education of this university. The teacher conducted the survey in
each class on the spot with the participants’ informed consent. The study protocol was approved
by the institutional review board: Ethics Committee of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy
of Sciences. Three waves of data were collected within two months after enrollment, considering
that the first semester or even the first few weeks of college may be especially crucial in terms of
student adaptation [43]. In wave 1 (October 2017), a total of 1428 students’ demographic variables (T1),
neuroticism (T1), psychological resilience (T1) and depressive symptoms (T1) were tested, and 1350
valid questionnaires were recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 94.54%. In wave 2 (November
2017), the data of 1423 first-year students’ addictive use of social media (T2) were collected, and 1262
valid questionnaires were recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 88.69%. In wave 3 (December
2017), 1425 first-year students’ depressive symptoms (T3) were measured, and 1271 valid questionnaires
were recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 89.19%.
Finally, the data of 1128 participants who were all valid in the three waves were included in
the analysis, after eliminating the samples with obvious regularity, a large number of blank answers
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6074 4 of 13

or those who only participated in one or two surveys. The range of participants’s age was 17–22 years
old (M = 18.74; SD = 0.48). Among them, 731 (64.80%) were female, 323 (28.63%) were the only child in
their family, and 309 (27.40%) had their family in the city where the university is located.

2.2. Measurement

2.2.1. Neuroticism
Neuroticism was measured by the neuroticism subscale of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory
(TIPI) [44], which contains two 7-point Likert items (“Anxious, easily upset.” and “Calm, emotionally
stable.”; 1 = Disagree strongly, 7 = Agree strongly). The second item above was scored in reverse.
The correlation between neuroticism in the TIPI scale and that in BFI-44 is 0.81 [44]. The Chinese
version of TIPI has good psychometric qualities in the Chinese sample [45].

2.2.2. Depressive Symptoms

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) [46] was used to assess the severity of depressive
symptoms. The scale contains nine 4-point Likert items (0 = Not at all, 3 = Nearly every day). An example
of the items is “Over the last two weeks, how often have you been bothered by any of the following
problems? Little interest or pleasure in doing things”. In the present study, we use ten as the cut-off
score [47,48]. Students with a total score of not lower than ten on PHQ-9 were judged as moderate
to severe depressive symptoms severity. The Chinese version of PHQ-9 held good psychometric
qualities in the Chinese sample [49]. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.84 in this study.

2.2.3. Addictive Use of Social Media

The measurement of addictive use of social media referred to the FB addiction dimension in
the Psycho-Social Aspect of Facebook Use Scale (PSAFU) [50], which includes four 5-point Likert
items (1 = completely inconsistent; 5 = completely consistent). By replacing “Facebook” with “SNSs,”
we revised the scale to be more suitable for Chinese college students. An example of the items is “Some
people from my surrounding have told me that I spend too much time on the SNSs.” In this study,
Cronbach’s alpha was 0.69.

2.2.4. Psychological Resilience

Psychological resilience was measured by the 10-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (10-item
CD-RISC) [51], which contains ten 5-point Likert items (1 = never; 5 = always). An example of the items
is “Able to adapt to change.” The higher the average score, the higher the psychological resilience level
of the participants. The Chinese version of the 10-item CD-RISC held good psychometric properties
and is applicable for Chinese people [52]. In this study, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90.

2.3. Analytical Strategy

PROCESS macro for SPSS with bootstrapping (95% CI, 5000 samples) was used to test the
moderated mediation model [53]. Controlled variables from wave 1 were added as covariates in the
model, including gender (1 = Male, 0 = Female), age, the only child or not in the family (1 = Yes,
0 = No), location of the family (1 = In the city where the university is located, 0 = Outside the city
where the university is located) and the baseline level of depressive symptoms.

3. Results

3.1. Prevalence of Moderate to Severe Severity of Depressive Symptoms

Among the 1128 students, the prevalence of moderate to severe severity of depressive symptoms
was 10.28% in the first survey. There were 35 cases with moderate to severe severity of depressive
symptoms (8.82%) among 397 male students and 81 (11.08%) among 731 female students. There was
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6074 5 of 13

no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of moderate to severe severity of depressive

symptoms between male and female students (χ2 = 1.43, p = 0.232) in the first survey.
In the third survey, the prevalence of moderate to severe severity of depressive symptoms was
11.17% among the 1128 students. There were 47 cases with moderate to severe severity of depressive
symptoms (11.84%) among 397 male students and 79 (10.81%) among 731 female students. There was
no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of moderate to severe severity of depressive
symptoms between male and female students (χ2 = 0.276, p = 0.599) in the third survey.
Eighty-three students (7.36%) who did not have moderate to severe depressive symptoms in the
first survey turned to have in the third survey. On the other hand, 73 students of the total 1128 students
(6.47%) who had moderate to severe depressive symptoms in the first survey turned not to have in the
third survey.

3.2. Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Analysis

Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis results were shown in Table 1. Neuroticism (T1)
was positively correlated with depressive symptoms (T1). Addictive use of social media (T2) and
depressive symptoms (T3), addictive use of social media (T2) was positively correlated with depressive
symptoms (T1) and depressive symptoms (T3). Psychological resilience was negatively correlated
with neuroticism (T1), depressive symptoms (T1), addictive use of social media (T2) and depressive
symptoms (T3).

Table 1. Means, standard deviations, and correlations among research variables.

Research
M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Variables
1.Gender
(male = 1
female = 0)
2.Age 18.74 0.83 −0.02
3.The Only
0.239 *** −0.134 ***
Child or Not
4.Location of
−0.045 0.016 −0.032
Family
5.Depressive
symptoms 0.62 0.38 −0.080 ** 0.011 −0.066 * 0.043
(T1)
6.Neuroticism
3.60 1.12 −0.111 *** −0.012 −0.029 −0.02 0.411 ***
(T1)
7.Psychological
3.51 0.61 0.180 *** 0.041 0.05 −0.022 −0.355 *** −0.415 ***
Resilience (T1)
8.Addictive
Use of Social 2.28 0.74 −0.014 0.009 −0.001 −0.022 0.214 *** 0.177 *** −0.148 ***
Media (T2)
9.Depressive
symptoms 0.67 0.39 −0.022 −0.04 −0.059 * 0.004 0.507 *** 0.270 *** −0.239 *** 0.300 ***
(T3)
Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.01.

3.3. Relationship Between Neuroticism and Sepressive Symptoms: Test of a Moderated Mediation Model
The results of polynomial regression analysis were shown in Table 2. After controlling for
gender, age, the only child or not in family, location of family, and depressive symptoms level (T1),
neuroticism (T1) positively predicted depressive symptoms (T3) (B = 0.03, SE = 0.01, t = 2.71, p = 0.007)
significantly. Neuroticism (T1) had a significant positive effect on levels of addictive use of social media
(T2) (B = 0.05, SE = 0.02, t = 2.34, p = 0.02). Addictive use of social media (T2) positively predicted
depressive symptoms (T3) (B = 0.10, SE = 0.01, t = 7.64, p < 0.001) significantly. After controlling for
addictive use of social media (T2), neuroticism (T1) still positively predicted depressive symptoms
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6074 6 of 13

(T3) (B = 0.02, SE = 0.01, t = 2, p = 0.045) significantly. The Bootstrap test using Model 4 of PROCESS
showed that addictive use of social media (T2) played a significant mediating role between neuroticism
(T1) and depressive symptoms (T3) (95% Boot CI = (0.002, 0.013)).

Table 2. Multiple regression results of the moderated mediation model.

Independent Variable B SE t p R2 F
Dependent Variable: Depressive symptoms (T3)
Gender 0.03 0.02 1.23 0.221
Age −0.02 0.01 −1.92 0.056
The Only Child or Not −0.03 0.02 −1.53 0.127
0.27 67.57 ***
Location of Family −0.01 0.02 −0.53 0.599
Depressive symptoms (T1) 0.48 0.03 16.91 <0.001
Neuroticism (T1) 0.03 0.01 2.71 0.007
Dependent Variable: Addictive Use of Social Media (T2)
Gender 0.03 0.05 0.66 0.509
Age 0.01 0.03 0.26 0.791
The Only Child or Not 0.02 0.05 0.39 0.700
Location of Family −0.04 0.05 −0.92 0.358
0.07 10.55 ***
Depressive symptoms (T1) 0.33 0.06 5.27 <0.001
Neuroticism (T1) 0.05 0.02 2.34 0.020
Psychological Resilience (T1) −0.08 0.04 −1.99 0.047
Neuroticism (T1) ×
0.10 0.03 3.63 <0.001
Psychological Resilience (T1)
Dependent Variable: Depressive symptoms (T3)
Gender 0.03 0.02 1.20 0.230
Age −0.02 0.01 −2.05 0.041
The Only Child or Not −0.04 0.02 −1.66 0.098
Location of Family −0.01 0.02 −0.33 0.741 0.30 69.21 ***
Depressive symptoms (T1) 0.45 0.03 15.89 <0.001
Neuroticism (T1) 0.02 0.01 2.00 0.045
Addictive Use of Social
0.10 0.01 7.64 <0.001
media (T2)
Note: *** p < 0.001; B—unstandardized regression weight; SE—standard error for the unstandardized regression
weight; t—t-test statistic; F—F-test statistic.

To examine the moderation effect of psychological resilience (T1) in this mediation model,
we applied Model 7 in PROCESS macro to do the Bootstrap test. Neuroticism (T1) and psychological
resilience (T1) were centralized before constructing the interaction term. The results showed that
the mediating effect was significantly moderated by psychological resilience (T1), indicating that the
moderated mediation model was established (95% Boot CI = (0.003, 0.019)). Specifically, the mediating
effect was not significant at low level of psychological resilience (−1 SD; 95% Boot CI = (−0.008, 0.006)),
while was significant at medium level (95% Boot CI = (0.000, 0.011)) and high level of psychological
resilience (+1 SD; 95% Boot CI = (0.005, 0.019)). The mediating effect of addictive use of social media
(T2) at different levels of psychological resilience (T1) was shown in Figure 2.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6074 7 of 13

Figure 2. The mediating effect of addictive use of social media (T2) at different levels of psychological
resilience (T1).

Meanwhile, the neuroticism (T1) × psychological resilience (T1) interaction significantly predicted
addictive use of social media (T2) (B = 0.10, SE = 0.03, t = 3.63, p < 0.001; see Figure 3). The influence of
neuroticism (T1) on addictive use of social media (T2) was not significant when the level of psychological
resilience (T1) is low (B = −0.01, SE = 0.03, t = −0.31, p = 0.757) and was significant when psychological
resilience (T1) is at medium (B = 0.05, SE = 0.02, t = 2.34, p = 0.02) and high level (B = 0.11, SE = 0.03,
t = 4.23, p < 0.001).

Figure 3. Simple slope test of the interaction between neuroticism (T1) and psychological resilience
(T1) on the addictive use of social media (T2).
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6074 8 of 13

4. Discussion
In this study, the relationship between neuroticism and depressive symptoms of first-year students
was investigated by longitudinal tracking. The mediating and moderating effects of addictive use of
social media and psychological resilience were explored, and a moderated mediation model was
constructed. The results help to understand the two critical issues of how and under which conditions
the neuroticism of first-year college students affect their depressive symptoms.

4.1. Prevalence of Moderate to Severe Severity of Depressive Symptoms

Among the 1128 students, the prevalence of moderate to severe severity of depressive symptoms
was 10.28% in the first survey, and 11.17% in the third survey with the cut-off score no less than 10
of PHQ-9 scores. Of the 397 male students, 35 cases had moderate to severe severity of depressive
symptoms (8.82%) in the first survey and 47 (11.84%) in the third survey. Of the 731 female students,
81 cases had moderate to severe severity of depressive symptoms (11.08%) in the first survey and 79
(10.81%) in the third survey. Moreover, 83 students (7.36%) who did not have moderate to severe
severity of depressive symptoms when they enrolled in the college turned to do two months later.
However, previous studies showed that the prevalence of depression under the same standard
ranged from 4.23% to 7.00% in the general Chinese population [49,54], which is 9.56% in males
and 5.60% in females [49]. The results suggest that first-year students have a higher prevalence of
moderate to severe severity of depressive symptoms than that in the general population, representing
it is necessary to pay attention to and research the adaptation problems and depressive symptoms
of first-year students, considering the higher risk of depression for the students with poor school
adjustment [3].

4.2. Mediation of Addictive Use of Social Media

This study shows that first-year college students’ neuroticism can significantly predict depressive
symptoms two months later. High neuroticism people usually show more emotion dysregulation and
psychological inflexibility, which can also explain why individuals with high neuroticism are more
prone to depression [9]. This study also found that neuroticism can significantly predict the addictive
use of social media, indicating that the higher the level of neuroticism, the more likely an addiction to
social media, which is consistent with the previous research results [33,55]. Meanwhile, the addictive
use of social media can significantly predict depressive symptoms. The higher the intensity of first-year
students’ addictive use of social media, the higher the risk of depression, which is in line with previous
researches [28,29,56].
This study confirmed that the addictive use of social media plays a significant mediating role
in the influencing process of neuroticism on depressive symptoms. This paper further explains
the mechanism of neuroticism’s influence on depressive symptoms; that is, neuroticism affects the
depressive symptoms level of first-year students directly and indirectly through addictive use of social
media, which serves as a bridge between neuroticism and depressive symptoms.

4.3. Moderation of Psychological Resilience

Psychological resilience plays a moderating role in the relationship between neuroticism and the
addictive use of social media. The improvement of psychological resilience does not reduce the risk of
addictive social media use of high neurotic individuals. However, it protects the low neuroticism ones.
Namely, with the improvement of psychological resilience, low neuroticism individuals reduce their
addictive use of social media significantly. This also suggests that in addition to the buffering
effect (reducing the risk of high-risk individuals), there is also an increasing effect (making low-risk
individuals perform better) of psychological resilience, which echoes the current research results [57].
Our results show that low neurotic individuals likewise have a risk of addictive use of social media if
their psychological resilience level is not high.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6074 9 of 13

At the same time, this study has constructed a moderated mediation model to investigate the
moderating role of resilience in the mediating process of “neuroticism -> addictive use of social
media -> depressive symptoms”. The results show that neuroticism directly affects the depressive
symptoms level of individuals with low resilience. With the improvement of resilience, neuroticism
impacts the level of depressive symptoms through the mediating effect of addictive use of social media.
Therefore, first-year college students with high psychological resilience, regardless of their neuroticism,
can avoid depression and promote their adaptation to college life from the perspective of intervention
in the addictive use of social media. However, this approach is not appropriate with low resilience,
and other interventions should be sought. For example, when both neuroticism and resilience are low,
the latter can be improved by the optimal level of participation in sports activities according to gender
and age [58].

5. Implication and Limitation

5.1. Implication
Theoretically, the present study implied that low neuroticism people with low psychological
resilience might also have a risk of addictive use of social media. Second, psychological resilience
acts not as a buffer, but as an increasing effect, making people with low neuroticism less likely to be
addicted to social media. Third, the mediating effect of addictive use of social media is different in
people with different psychological resilience. That is, the mediating effect was not significant at the
low level of psychological resilience, but was significant at the medium and high level of psychological
resilience. These results provide a more sophisticated knowledge of understanding the depressive
symptoms of first-year college students.
Practically, the present study provides insights into how and under what conditions, neuroticism
leads to a higher level of depressive symptoms, which enables several practical implications for
reducing the risk of depression of first-year college students with adaptation problems: (a) after
controlling the baseline level of depressive symptoms, neuroticism and addictive use of social media
are all risk factors of first-year college students’ depression. Therefore, research on the personality traits
of first-year college students and dynamic evaluation of their social media behaviors can be undergone
after enrollment to predict their depressive symptoms two months after effectively. (b) More accurate
classification guidance can be offered based on differences in first-year college students’ personality
characteristics and resilience. On the one hand, the possibility of the addictive use of social media of
low neuroticism individuals can be reduced by improving their psychological resilience according to
the moderating effect. On the other hand, based on the results of the mediating effect, individuals with
high resilience need attention to avoid the addictive use of social media to better adapt to college life.

5.2. Limitation
Although some valuable results have been obtained in this study, there are still some deficiencies.
First, neuroticism in this study involves a relatively broad personality construct without subdividing
different aspects. In future research, the neuroticism personality dimension can be subdivided to
distinguish the impact of different aspects on the relationship between addictive use of social media
and depressive symptoms. Second, this study used longitudinal data to analyze and provided evidence
to support the hypothesized path from the addictive use of social media to depressive symptoms.
However, some studies pointed out that depression was a critical antecedent variable of social media
addiction [59,60]. Future research can start from this perspective to explore the more abundant dyadic
relationship between the two.

6. Conclusions
The current research focuses on the depressive symptoms of first-year college students. It aims to
provide insights into how (the mediation role of addictive use of social media), and under what
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6074 10 of 13

conditions (the moderator role of psychological resilience), neuroticism leads to a higher level of
depressive symptoms. The most obvious findings to emerge from this study are that low neuroticism
people with low psychological resilience might also have a risk of addictive use of social media,
psychological resilience acts as an increasing effect decreasing the risk of low neuroticism individual’s
addictive use of social media, and addictive use of social media plays the mediating effect only with
medium and high psychological resilience. The insights gained from this study may help understand
the depressive symptoms of first-year college students and provide intervention guidance for the
adaptation problems.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, M.Z., W.M., D.Z., Y.W. and F.L.; methodology, W.M., D.Z., F.L. and M.Z.;
formal analysis, W.M. and D.Z.; investigation, Y.W., F.L. and L.Y.; resources, Y.W., L.Y. and K.W.; data curation, L.Y.
and Y.W.; writing—original draft preparation, D.Z. and W.M.; writing—review and editing, M.Z., W.M. and D.Z.;
visualization, D.Z., W.M. and K.W.; supervision, M.Z.; project administration, M.Z. All authors have read and
agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments: We wish to thank the students who participated in this research on a voluntary basis.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
1. Leong, F.T.L.; Bonz, M.H.; Zachar, P. Coping styles as predictors of college adjustment among freshmen.
Couns. Psychol. Q. 1997, 10, 211–220. [CrossRef]
2. Dyson, R.; Renk, K. Freshmen adaptation to university life: Depressive symptoms, stress, and coping. J. Clin.
Psychol. 2006, 62, 1231–1244. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Chui, R.C.-F.; Chan, C.-K. School Adjustment, Social Support, and Mental Health of Mainland Chinese
College Students in Hong Kong. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 2017, 58, 88–100. [CrossRef]
4. Garlow, S.J.; Rosenberg, J.; Moore, J.D.; Haas, A.P.; Koestner, B.; Hendin, H.; Nemeroff, C.B. Depression,
desperation, and suicidal ideation in college students: Results from the American Foundation for Suicide
Prevention College Screening Project at Emory University. Depress. Anxiety 2008, 25, 482–488. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
5. Jasso-Medrano, J.L.; López, F. Measuring the relationship between social media use and addictive behavior
and depression and suicide ideation among university students. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 87, 183–191.
[CrossRef]
6. Martin, M. Neuroticism as predisposition toward depression: A cognitive mechanism. Pers. Individ. Differ.
1985, 6, 353–365. [CrossRef]
7. Saklofske, D.; Kelly, I.; Janzen, B. Neuroticism, depression, and depression proneness. Pers. Individ. Differ.
1995, 18, 27–31. [CrossRef]
8. Klein, D.N.; Kotov, R.; Bufferd, S.J. Personality and depression: Explanatory models and review of the
evidence. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2011, 7, 269–295. [CrossRef]
9. Paulus, D.J.; Vanwoerden, S.; Norton, P.J.; Sharp, C. Emotion dysregulation, psychological inflexibility, and
shame as explanatory factors between neuroticism and depression. J. Affect. Disord. 2016, 190, 376–385.
[CrossRef]
10. Andreassen, C.S.; Pallesen, S.; Griffiths, M.D. The relationship between addictive use of social media,
narcissism, and self-esteem: Findings from a large national survey. Addict. Behav. 2017, 64, 287–293.
[CrossRef]
11. Gao, T.; Xiang, Y.-T.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Mei, S. Neuroticism and quality of life: Multiple mediating
effects of smartphone addiction and depression. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 2017, 258, 457–461. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
12. Turel, O.; Poppa, N.T.; Gil-Or, O. Neuroticism Magnifies the Detrimental Association between Social Media
Addiction Symptoms and Wellbeing in Women, but Not in Men: A three-Way Moderation Model. Psychiatr. Q.
2018, 89, 605–619. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6074 11 of 13

13. John, O.P.; Naumann, L.P.; Soto, C.J. Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: History,
measurement, and conceptual issues. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research; John, O.P., Robins, R.W.,
Pervin, L.A., Eds.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 114–158. [CrossRef]
14. Lahey, B.B. Public health significance of neuroticism. Am. Psychol. 2009, 64, 241–256. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Digman, J.M. Higher-order factors of the Big Five. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1997, 73, 1246–1256. [CrossRef]
16. Otani, K.; Suzuki, A.; Matsumoto, Y.; Shirata, T.; Noto, K.; Kanno, M. Implication of core beliefs about
negative-self in neuroticism. Int. J. Psychiatry Clin. Pract. 2020, 1–6. [CrossRef]
17. Canli, T. Toward a Neurogenetic Theory of Neuroticism. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1129, 153–174. [CrossRef]
18. Enns, M.W.; Cox, B.J. Personality dimensions and depression: Review and commentary. Can. J. Psychiatry
1997, 42, 274–284. [CrossRef]
19. Pereira-Morales, A.; Adan, A.; Forero, D.A. Perceived Stress as a Mediator of the Relationship between
Neuroticism and Depression and Anxiety Symptoms. Curr. Psychol. 2017, 38, 66–74. [CrossRef]
20. Social Media Fact Sheet. Available online: http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media (accessed on
24 June 2020).
21. The 45th Statistical Report on Internet Development in China. Available online: http://www.cnnic.net.cn/
hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/202004/t20200428_70974.htm (accessed on 24 June 2020).
22. Kim, J.-H.; Lee, J.-E.R. The Facebook Paths to Happiness: Effects of the Number of Facebook Friends and
Self-Presentation on Subjective Well-Being. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2011, 14, 359–364. [CrossRef]
23. Valkenburg, P.M.; Peter, J.; Schouten, A.P. Friend Networking Sites and Their Relationship to Adolescents’
Well-Being and Social Self-Esteem. CyberPsychol. Behav. 2006, 9, 584–590. [CrossRef]
24. Beranuy, M.; Oberst, U.; Carbonell, X.; Chamarro, A.; Chamarro, A. Problematic Internet and mobile phone
use and clinical symptoms in college students: The role of emotional intelligence. Comput. Hum. Behav.
2009, 25, 1182–1187. [CrossRef]
25. Twenge, J.M.; Joiner, T.E.; Rogers, M.L.; Martin, G.N. Increases in Depressive Symptoms, Suicide-Related
Outcomes, and Suicide Rates Among U.S. Adolescents After 2010 and Links to Increased New Media Screen
Time. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 2017, 6, 3–17. [CrossRef]
26. Vannucci, A.; Flannery, K.M.; Ohannessian, C.M. Social media use and anxiety in emerging adults.
J. Affect. Disord. 2017, 207, 163–166. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27. Woods, H.C.; Scott, H. #Sleepyteens: Social media use in adolescence is associated with poor sleep quality,
anxiety, depression and low self-esteem. J. Adolesc. 2016, 51, 41–49. [CrossRef]
28. O’Keeffe, G.S.; Clarke-Pearson, K. The Impact of Social Media on Children, Adolescents, and Families.
Pediatrics 2011, 127, 800–804. [CrossRef]
29. Kelly, Y.; Zilanawala, A.; Booker, C.; Sacker, A. Social Media Use and Adolescent Mental Health: Findings
From the UK Millennium Cohort Study. EClinicalMedicine 2019, 6, 59–68. [CrossRef]
30. Giota, K.G.; Kleftaras, G. The role of personality and depression in problematic use of social networking sites
in Greece. Cyberpsychology J. Psychosoc. Res. Cyberspace 2013, 7. [CrossRef]
31. Andreassen, C.S.; Torsheim, T.; Brunborg, G.S.; Pallesen, S. Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale.
Psychol. Rep. 2012, 110, 501–517. [CrossRef]
32. Marengo, D.; Poletti, I.; Settanni, M. The interplay between neuroticism, extraversion, and social media
addiction in young adult Facebook users: Testing the mediating role of online activity using objective data.
Addict. Behav. 2020, 102, 106150. [CrossRef]
33. Correa, T.; Hinsley, A.W.; Gil De Zúñiga, H. Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality
and social media use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 247–253. [CrossRef]
34. Amichai-Hamburger, Y.; Wainapel, G.; Fox, S. “On the Internet No One Knows I’m an Introvert”: Extroversion,
Neuroticism, and Internet Interaction. CyberPsychology Behav. 2002, 5, 125–128. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Michikyan, M.; Subrahmanyam, K.; Dennis, J. Can you tell who I am? Neuroticism, extraversion, and online
self-presentation among young adults. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014, 33, 179–183. [CrossRef]
36. Ho, S.S.; Lwin, M.O.; Lee, E.W. Till logout do us part? Comparison of factors predicting excessive social
network sites use and addiction between Singaporean adolescents and adults. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 75,
632–642. [CrossRef]
37. Rutter, M. Implications of Resilience Concepts for Scientific Understanding. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1094,
1–12. [CrossRef]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6074 12 of 13

38. Ong, A.D.; Bergeman, C.S.; Bisconti, T.L.; Wallace, K.A. Psychological resilience, positive emotions, and
successful adaptation to stress in later life. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2006, 91, 730–749. [CrossRef]
39. Edward, K.-L. Resilience: A Protector From Depression. J. Am. Psychiatr. Nurses Assoc. 2005, 11, 241–243.
[CrossRef]
40. Rahat, E.; Ilhan, T. Coping Styles, Social Support, Relational Self-Construal, and Resilience in Predicting
Students’ Adjustment to University Life. Educ. Sci. Theory Pr. 2016, 16, 187–208. [CrossRef]
41. Wisniewski, P.; Jia, H.; Wang, N.; Zheng, S.; Xu, H.; Rosson, M.B.; Carroll, J.M. Resilience Mitigates the
Negative Effects of Adolescent Internet Addiction and Online Risk Exposure. In Proceedings of the 33rd
Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Korea, 2015; Association for Computing
Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 4029–4038.
42. Sheerin, C.M.; Lind, M.J.; Brown, E.A.; Gardner, C.O.; Kendler, K.S.; Amstadter, A.B. The impact of resilience
and subsequent stressful life events on MDD and GAD. Depression Anxiety 2017, 35, 140–147. [CrossRef]
43. Bowman, N.A.; Jarratt, L.; Jang, N.; Bono, T.J. The Unfolding of Student Adjustment During the First Semester
of College. Res. High. Educ. 2018, 60, 273–292. [CrossRef]
44. Gosling, S.D.; Rentfrow, P.J.; Swann, W.B., Jr. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. J.
Res. Pers. 2003, 37, 504–528. [CrossRef]
45. Li, J. Psychometric Properties of Ten-Item Personality Inventory in China. China J. Health Psychol. 2013, 21,
1689–1692. [CrossRef]
46. Kroenke, K.; Spitzer, R.L. The PHQ-9: A New Depression Measure. Psychiatr. Ann. 2002, 32, 509–515.
[CrossRef]
47. Min, B.-q.; Zhou, A.-h.; Liang, F.; Jia, J. Clinical application of Patient Health Questionnaire for
self-administered measurement (PHQ-9) as screening tool for depression. J. Neurosci. Ment. Health
2013, 13, 569–572. [CrossRef]
48. Manea, L.; Gilbody, S.; McMillan, D. Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health
Questionnaire (PHQ-9): A meta-analysis. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2011, 184, E191–E196. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
49. Wang, W.; Bian, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, W.; Du, J.; Zhang, G.; Zhou, Q.; Zhao, M. Reliability and validity
of the Chinese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in the general population. Gen. Hosp.
Psychiatry 2014, 36, 539–544. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
50. Bodroža, B.; Jovanovic, T. Validation of the new scale for measuring behaviors of Facebook users: Psycho-Social
Aspects of Facebook Use (PSAFU). Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 54, 425–435. [CrossRef]
51. Campbell-Sills, L.; Stein, M.B. Psychometric analysis and refinement of the connor–davidson resilience scale
(CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. J. Trauma. Stress 2007, 20, 1019–1028. [CrossRef]
52. Wang, L.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Psychometric properties of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience
Scale in Chinese earthquake victims. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2010, 64, 499–504. [CrossRef]
53. Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process. Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach;
Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2013.
54. Yu, N.X.; Tam, W.W.S.; Wong, P.T.; Lam, T.H.; Stewart, S.M. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for measuring
depressive symptoms among the general population in Hong Kong. Compr. Psychiatry 2012, 53, 95–102.
[CrossRef]
55. Cho, H.-Y.; Kim, D.J.; Park, J.W. Stress and adult smartphone addiction: Mediation by self-control, neuroticism,
and extraversion. Stress Health 2017, 33, 624–630. [CrossRef]
56. Donnelly, E.; Kuss, D.J. Depression among Users of Social Networking Sites (SNSs): The Role of SNS
Addiction and Increased Usage. J. Addict. Prev. Med. 2016, 2, 107. [CrossRef]
57. Zhang, J.; Zhou, M.; Yu, N.X. Neighborhood Characteristics and Older Adults’ Well-Being: The Roles of
Sense of Community and Personal Resilience. Soc. Indic. Res. 2017, 137, 1490. [CrossRef]
58. Griciūtė, A. Optimal Level of Participation in Sport Activities According to Gender and Age can be Associated
with Higher Resilience: Study of Lithuanian Adolescents. Sch. Ment. Health 2015, 8, 257–267. [CrossRef]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6074 13 of 13

59. Chang, F.-C.; Chiu, C.-H.; Lee, C.-M.; Chen, P.-H.; Miao, N.-F. Predictors of the initiation and persistence of
Internet addiction among adolescents in Taiwan. Addict. Behav. 2014, 39, 1434–1440. [CrossRef]
60. Li, G.; Hou, G.; Yang, N.; Jian, H.; Wang, W. Relationship between anxiety, depression, sex, obesity, and
internet addiction in Chinese adolescents: A short-term longitudinal study. Addict. Behav. 2019, 90, 421–427.
[CrossRef]

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).