CHAPTER 1-5 LGBTQ
CHAPTER 1-5 LGBTQ
The main purpose of this study was to explore and understand the lived
of 10 participants were involved in the conduct of this study -five (5) for the In-
depth Interview (IDI) and five (5) for the Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Data
coding, initial theming, and then final data analysis. The final analysis revealed
National High School include four (4) themes: devising means to sustain and
connection with parents and guardians, and conferring with parents for
lived experiences include five (5) themes: struggling with the transition,
Impact (3) themes for their insights: Acceptance and Self-Love, Ignoring
Negative Opinions and Bullying; and Support from Friends. Four (4) themes for
Ignoring Negative and Accepting of who you are as LGBTQ+ Youth, Ignoring
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Immeasurable appreciation and deepest gratitude for the help and support
are extended to the following persons who, in one way or another, have contributed
Foremost, I want to offer this endeavor to our God almighty for the wisdom he
bestowed upon me, the strength, peace of my mind, and good health in order to
shared their experiences and insights, making this study possible. Special thanks go
to Sir , Emmanuel M. Bela-ong for their invaluable guidance throughout the research
Table of Contents
PAGE
TITLE PAGE i
APPORVAL SHEET ii
ABSTRACT iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS vi
CHAPTER
1 INTRODUCTION
Theoretical Lens
Definition of Terms
3 METHODOLOGY
Research Design
Research Participants
Data Sources
Data Analysis
Ethical Consideration
4 RESULTS
5 DISCUSSIONS
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
Students who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBTQ) too often
across various countries. A study by Ryan et al. (2018) highlighted the pervasive
the United States, LGBTQ+ youth face issues such as bullying, homelessness, and
mental health disparities (Russell & Fish, 2016). Similarly, in India, societal stigma
and lack of legal protections contribute to the marginalization of LGBT+ youth who
challenges within the cultural and societal context. Discrimination and stigma are
widespread, and legal protections for LGBTQ+ rights remain limited. Students
emphasized the need for greater support and advocacy to address the specific needs
support services further isolates them from mainstream society (Santos et al., 2018).
youth, especially within particular geographic areas like Davao. Current research
This study stems from the need to address the unique challenges faced by
LGBTQ youth. Recent reports highlight the importance of creating inclusive school
that foster understanding. We always hear them say “Pre, bakla ka ba?”, “Tibo ka?
Yuck! Kadiri!”, “Suntukan tayo! Ano? Bading ka ba?” Growing up, the researcher
observed that the words “bakla”, “bayot”, “bading”, “tomboy”, and “tibo” carry negative
connotations. People use these terms as forms of insult or degradation. We
conducted this research not just to know the experiences of LGBTQ youth but also to
help them protect themselves and avoid getting bullied or discriminated by other
people.
youth in Anibongan National High School. Through in-depth interviews and thematic
analysis, the research aims to uncover the diverse ways in which LGBTQ+ youth
Additionally, the study endeavors to highlight the resilience, strengths, and coping
LGBTQ+ experiences by providing insights that are contextualized within the socio-
cultural landscape of Anibongan National High School. By amplifying the voices and
narratives of LGBTQ+ youth in this locality, the research seeks to inform community-
advocacy for the LGBTQ+ community in Anibongan, Maco, Davao de Oro, and
beyond.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
1. What are the lived experiences of LGBT+ as they accepted their LGBT Q
identity?
2. What valuable insights or lessons have you gained about yourself, your
and maintain your emotional well-being in Anibongan National High School when
THEORETICAL LENS
Luckmann, 1996) posits that identities and experiences are not inherent or fixed but
emphasizes that societal norms, beliefs, and power dynamics shape the
community. This theory recognizes that LGBTQ youth's experiences are influenced
constructed. It emphasizes the role of societal norms, beliefs, and power dynamics in
society or community. In the study, Social Constructionist Theory can help analyze
how social interactions, language, and cultural contexts influence the construction of
LGBTQ identities and how LGBTQ youth navigate their experiences within these
social constructs.
Resilience Theory:
This study was also anchored on the Resilience Theory (Werner & Smith,
1992) focuses on understanding the factors and processes that contribute to the
resilience and well-being of LGBTQ youth in the face of adversity. It examines the
stigma, and social rejection. This lens acknowledges the strengths and coping
factors and processes that contribute to the resilience and well-being of LGBTQ
community-level resources and protective factors that help LGBTQ youth navigate
and overcome challenges such as discrimination, stigma, and social rejection. In the
study, Resilience Theory can help explore the strengths, coping mechanisms, and
support systems employed by LGBTQ youth to maintain their well-being and thrive
Queer Theory:
traditional notions of gender, sexuality, and identity. It emphasizes the fluidity and
structures, and systems of oppression that impact the lives of LGBTQ individuals. It
seeks to dismantle binary categorizations and promote inclusivity and acceptance of
traditional notions of gender, sexuality, and identity. It emphasizes the fluidity and
individuals resist and subvert heteronormative norms and expectations. In the study,
Queer Theory can help examine how LGBTQ youth navigate their identities and
norms, power structures, and systems of oppression that impact the lives of LGBTQ
individuals.
These three theoretical lenses provide different perspectives and insights into
societal norms shape LGBTQ identities, Resilience Theory focuses on the factors
that contribute to their well-being, and Queer Theory challenges normative notions of
construction of LGBTQ identities, the challenges faced by LGBTQ youth, and the
This qualitative research entitled “Beyond the Closet: Unveiling the Realities
LGBTQ+ youth aged 14-19 in Anibongan National High School. It will explore various
demographic and geographic location. The age range of participants may exclude
older LGBTQ+ individuals, and the qualitative approach may limit statistical
generalizations. Additionally, the study may not capture the full spectrum of LGBTQ+
This research will focus solely on LGBTQ+ youth aged 14-19 in Anibongan,
Maco, Davao de Oro, excluding other age groups and LGBTQ+ individuals from
different locations. The study will primarily employ qualitative methods such as
experiences of LGBTQ youth and for the students to gain more knowledge on what is
the experiences of LGBTQ youth and how they face challenges like discrimination
and bullying. Another benefit is to help us know how to treat them, and what things
School: to develop policies and practices that promote safety and respect for
where resources are needed to support LGBTQ+ students. This could include
Families: The study can help families better understand the unique
challenges and experiences of LGBTQ+ youth. This can lead to more supportive and
affirming home environments. When LGBTQ+ youth feel supported by their families,
they experience less stress and anxiety. This can lead to better mental and emotional
health.
Community Leaders: The study can provide community leaders with insights
into the challenges and experiences of LGBTQ+ youth in their community. This
knowledge can help them make better decisions about programs and services that
support LGBTQ+ youth. Can help community leaders to identify and partner with
DEFINITION OF TERMS
with increased visibility, acceptance, and affirmation. (D’Augelli & Grossman, 2006)
In this study, “beyond the closet” refers to the exploration of LGBTQ+ youth
gender identity, including identity formation, social relationships, and encounters with
Sims, 2010).
In this research, “LGBTQ+ youth experiences” refer to the multifaceted
Oro, relating to their sexual orientation or gender identity, including but not limited to
Chapter 1. This chapter introduces the research and everything about it. The
contents of this chapter are rationale, purpose of the study, research question,
theoretical lens, importance of the study, definition of terms, scope and limitations,
with justification of our chosen research method, and describe the process and
Chapter 4. This chapter discuss the results of the study based on research
underlying the phenomenological aspects of views. These are the views gathered
Chapter 5. In this chapter shows the basis of the findings of the study. It is
also discussed the explanation of it’s implications in the practice and further research
experiences of LGBTQ youth and the literature about the variables of interest.
For lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, asexual, non-binary, and other queer
LGBTQ students who have other marginalized identities, such as being ethnic
instance, (Truong et al. (2020) found that 40% of Black LGBTQ students experienced
harassment or assault due to their sexual orientation, gender identity, and race, with
Minority Stressors may negatively affect the lives of LGBTQ individuals. They
people may suffer stress or lack of self-confidence due to their sexuality (Minturn et
al., 2021)
Research on LGBTQ+ youth has focused on the risk factors and disparities
these young people experience compared with youth who are not LGBTQ+.
However, more recently there has been research on resiliency and protective factors,
LGBTQ+ youth who have access to spaces that affirm their sexual orientation and
gender identity report lower rates of attempting suicide (The National Trevor Project,
2021) and experiencing supportive environments (Day, Loverno & Russell, 2019)
According to Kosciw et al. (2020), 81% of LGBTQ students have been verbally
harassed, 26% physically harassed, and 11% assaulted in the last year.
LGBTQ students who other have marginalized identity, such as being ethnic
instance, (Troung et al. 2020) found that 40% of Black LGBTQ students experienced
harassment or assault due to their sexual orientation, gender identity, and race, with
Research on LGBTQ+ youth has focused on the risk factors and disparities
these young people experience compared with youth who are not LGBT+. However,
more recently there has been research on resiliency and protective factors, which
youth who have access to spaces that affirm their sexual orientation and gender
identity report lower rates of attempting suicide (The National Trevor Project, 2021)
According to Kosciw et al. (2020), 81% of LGBTQ students have been verbally
harassed, 26% physically harassed, and 11% assaulted in the last year.
binary LGBQ+ youth who often go unrepresented in studies and the larger literature
base. At the same time, trans/non-binary youth face unique stressors at school
relative to their cisgender LGBQ+ peers, including even higher rates of victimization,
adult failure to use their correct gender pronouns, and risk for violence in gendered
spaces (Day, Perez-Brumer, & Russell, 2018; Murchison, Agénor, Reisner, &
Watson, 2019).
face many barriers when it comes to accessing health care services in Canada
(House of Commons Canada [HCC], 2019). These health inequities can be attributed
to the stigmatization of gender and sexual minorities and the discrimination they can
face, as well as the heteronormative and CIS normative nature of society in Canada,
leaving LGBTQ people feeling shame regarding their sexual orientation or gender
including depression, anxiety, and higher rates of unhealthy coping behaviors (eg,
LGBTQ) experience higher levels of discrimination, stigma, and stress and are at
higher risk of some poor health outcomes and health behavior compared to their
rural life for LGBTQ people in the United States described how the social and political
environment in rural areas are often less supportive of LGBTQ people, resulting in
isolation serve to amplify this issue, making self-advocacy in the ability to effect local
Given the health disparities and unique challenges that LGBTQ person
and well-being, and how these issues can be addressed through the removal of
barriers and improved education. One major barrier is the lack of standardized
of the need to prepare trainees for compassionate and comprehensive care to this
population (HCC, 20219; Schreiber et al., 2021). Recent studies examining LGBTQ
LGBTQ content was very limited and lacked standardization across institutions,
including depression, anxiety, and higher rates of unhealthy coping behaviors (HCC,
2019; NASEM, 2020;) research shows that sexual minorities (eg, LGBTQ)
experience higher levels of discrimination, stigma, and stress and at higher risk of
some poor health outcomes and health behavior compared to their heterosexual
and assault (11%) within the past year. Similarly, a (2016) report from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention revealed that LGBTQ youth in schools face higher
rates of forced sex and sexual and physical dating violence compared to their
victimization compared to their heterosexual and cisgender peers (Abreau & Kenny,
2018; Kosciw eta al., 2020;) National Association of School Psychologists [NASP],
(2018). It is important to note that the term LGBTQ in the context includes students
those who express diverse sexual orientations, gender identities, and gender
bullying and harassment (Abreau & Kenny, 2018; Kosciw et al., 2020). For example,
(Kosciw at al. (2020) found that approximately 95% of LGBTQ students have heard
homophobic remarks, and around 92% have heard negative comments about gender
minority peers. In a study involving 398 transgender youth, (Day et al. (2018)
discovered that transgender youth were more likely to experience victimization, and
health care services in Canada (House of Commons Canada [HCC], 2019). These
minorities and the discrimination they can face, as well as the heteronormative and
CIS normative nature of society in Canada, leaving LGBTQ people feeling shame
regarding their sexual orientation or gender identity (Girard in HCC, 2019). Previous
negative experiences with health care services, and cultural, religious, and personal
beliefs can all affect a patient's comfort in accessing health care and disclosing
The Movement Advancement Project report describing rural life for LGBTQ
people in the United States described how the social and political environment in
to amplify these issues, making self-advocacy and the ability to effect local change
challenges in various aspects of their life including education. LGBTQ+ student face
particular challenges both academically and socially (Johns et al., Citation 2021;
identity, many LGBTQ people experience further health differences due to the
intersection of other factors regarding their identity, including factors such as age,
ethnic origin, income, and access to healthcare (HCC, 2019; NASEM, 2020). Lack of
and insufficient research about the health of the LGBTQ population are also major
issues impacting both the quality of and access to appropriate care (NASEM, 2020).
Sexual and gender minorities have frequently reported needing to educate health
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE
Schools are a critical setting for many aspects of youth development, ranging
learning processes, and act as barriers to the academic achievement of the students
(Reijntjes et al., 2018). Another study was conducted in China with a sample of over
6000 LGBTQ youth and 409 transgender youth (Greytak et al., 2021) is examine the
experiences. In the previous study of (Kann et al., 2018) have investigated the effect
Philippines, are calling for a review of Republic Act 10627, also known as the
Anti Bullying Act of 2013, as well as the creation of mental health offices (MHOs) in
state universities and colleges (SUCs). Sen. Sherwin Gatchalian, stated that bullying
has a negative impact on students' academic performance, citing the 2018 Program
for International Student Assessment results that revealed that among 15-year-old
students from 79 participating countries, Filipino students are the most exposed to
bullying, with 65% of them doing so at least a few times per month. The evaluation
also revealed that students who said they had been threatened performed 56 points
worse in reading than those who had no or fewer frequent incidents Romero, (2023).
Chapter 3
Methodology
Research Design
Research Participants
Then, the researchers are going to hand consents to the selected participants
before starting the interview for approval. The other members will be assigned to find
a comfortable and quiet place for the survey and interview to happen. Their role is to
ask the questions and to have an interview while the others will record the response
using a mobile phone that has an audio recorder on it. After the interview all the data
information will be gathered, and the evaluation should be unbiased. The Participants
identity and information. Must be confidential for their privacy.
Data Sources
According to Taylor and Evans (2019) advocate for the integration of focus
group discussions and interviews as complementary data collection strategies in
qualitative research. This mixed-methods approach enables researchers to capture a
breadth of perspectives and validate findings across different contexts, thereby
enhancing the credibility and trustworthiness of the study.
Similarly, Harris and Lee (2020) propose a hybrid qualitative approach that
combines focus group discussions and interviews to investigate complex research
questions. They argue that this integrated method allows for a more nuanced
understanding of participants’ perspectives, facilitating a deeper exploration of the
research topic.
However, Martinez and Brown (2020) discuss the significance of focus group
discussions and interviews in qualitative research for exploring complex social
phenomena and understanding participants’ experiences within specific contexts.
They argue that these methods enable researchers to delve into the intricacies of
human behavior and perspectives, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of
the research topic.
Data Collection Procedure
To guarantee its validity and accuracy, the interview guide has undergone
validation by three experts in research who have assessed it based on guidelines for
preparing questions for Virtual Interviews and FGD. When everything was ready, a
virtual in-depth interview and FGD followed. We asked our participants to hide their
identity by using code names in the Zoom link when conducting virtual intensive
interviews. We’ve been asking them the relevant questions so that they can relate to
the situation requested by them. In the meantime, we asked for permission to use a
voice recorder during the discussion of the focus group, so that we could capture
everything and not miss any information shared, and we’d have a chance to review
when something went wrong or if there was confusion.
Data Analysis
There are previous approaches to conducting thematic analysis, but the most
common form follows a six-step process: familiarization, coding, generating themes,
reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and writing up. Following this
process can also help you avoid confirmation bias when formulating your analysis
(Caulfield, 2019).
Once the data has been thoroughly examined and understood, the most
straight forward approach to categorizing them into themes is through coding. Coding
in qualitative research involves systematic techniques for organizing, categorizing,
and thematically arranging collected data, providing a formal framework for
generating meaning (Williams & Moser, 2019). After coding, the next pivotal stage in
the data processing process is interpretation. Researchers will analyze the encoded
themes to discern patterns, linkages, and correlations present in the data. During the
interpretation phase, it is important to delve into the context and grasp the
importance of each theme. Researchers can enhance their comprehension of the
data by consistently recognizing patterns, with the goal of revealing hidden meanings
and insights derived from participants’ experiences.
This study included 15 students in Anibongan National High School with their
different lived experiences. We the researcher’s want to know that the information we
are sharing; the findings that we are searching for and the conclusions we draw are
supported by evidence. Therefore, to support the findings of this study, we conduct
an interview to collaborate the students/participants, with the help and cooperation of
the students and their parents, we as the researchers will carefully record the
findings through audio recording and writing down. We aim to put a knowledge, the
importance of our research is to gain good results and recognized for us to
understood and respect the LGBTQ individuals.
Ethical Consideration
Due to the sensitive nature of this topic various ethical considerations had to
be adhered to ensure that the participants would remain anonymous, and
confidentiality is applied and maintained. Therefore, before we conduct an interview a
letter was submitted to the assistant principal of Anibongan National High School.
These bodies has reviewed and approved the research design, informed parent
consent forms, interview guide questions and handling process.
All our participants were informed that the interviews were being audio
recorded and how the recording would be secured and kept confidential. They were
also informed that their identity would be protected as on identifiers would be
included in the published work. Participants also reminded repeatedly that their
participation in our study is voluntary, no financial incentives were given to them to be
part of our study and they all willingly agreed to share their experiences and thoughts
without expecting financial gain.
Chapter 4
RESULTS
This chapter represent the results of the lived experiences of LGBTQ Youth in
Anibongan National Highschool. It includes the answer of our participants from the
interviews conducted. We analyze and taken the core ideas of our participants. When
we transcribed their answer, we already identify the core ideas, and we got the
theme.
Table 1 shows the different core ideas that expounds each essential themes.
Table 1
Major Themes and Core Ideas on Beyond the Closet: Unveiling the
Realities of LGBTQ+ Youth Experiences
Discrimination
This theme discussed the challenges faced by individuals within the LGBT
community due to their identity. This discrimination manifests through negative
treatment and bullying from various sources, including neighbors, schoolmates, and
the broader community. Despite these external pressures and prejudices, the
individuals in question strive to maintain self-acceptance. This theme highlights the
resilience and inner strength required to stay true to oneself in the face of societal
rejection and hostility. It also underscores the pervasive nature of discrimination and
the importance of support and acceptance in overcoming such adversity.
IDI 1 shared:
Bullying
This theme encompasses several key aspects of how bullying manifests and
affects individuals. It highlights bullying as a significant and pervasive problem,
illustrating its widespread impact. The theme delves into personal recollections of
being bullied during elementary school, emphasizing how early experiences of
bullying can leave lasting emotional scars. Specifically, the theme addresses the hurt
caused by being taunted for not conforming to traditional gender norms, such as
being labeled a tomboy. This type of bullying is shown to have a profound impact on
the individual's confidence and self-esteem. Additionally, the theme underscores the
journey of personal growth and self-acceptance despite past bullying. It illustrates
how individuals, although initially affected by bullying due to their perceived
differences, can ultimately learn to embrace their true selves. This journey from pain
to self-acceptance highlights both the detrimental effects of bullying and the
resilience and strength required to overcome them.
IDI 1 shared:
FGD 1 also shared about their experienced being bullied in Elementary School
Lastly, FGD 2 reiterated her experienced being bullied in the past for perceived
differences but growing to accept oneself.
“Kaning, sauna gina bully ko nila tungod ing ani ko, pero
unya... samtang nagdako ko, wala gyud ko nagbag-o, mao
ra gihapon ko, busa gihapunad sila sa pagdawat niini, ug
ako usab nidawat lang."”
(Well, before I was bullied because they thought I was
disgusting, but then... when I was growing up, I really
didn't change, that's just how I am, so they were
accepting it, and I was just accepting it too.)
With these responses from LGBTQ youth participants of Anibongan National
High School, it really proves how bullying influence an individual on his/her
personality.
Acceptance
This theme underscores the importance of supportive relationships, especially
familial ones, in helping individuals embrace their true selves. It also acknowledges
the ongoing struggle for broader societal acceptance and the resilience required to
maintain self-acceptance in the face of external rejection.
IDI 2 stated that:
It was further elaborated by FGD 2 that they accepted by others their selves.
Due to the judgments that they experienced, social support especially family
support is the resource to increase greater acceptance of their own sexual identity,
supportive relatives also contribute resilience and thriving and improves their self-
esteem.
Self-Acceptance
This theme emphasizes the importance of internal validation and the journey
towards embracing one's identity fully. It involves rejecting external negativity, feeling
at ease with one's natural attractions, and integrating one's LGBT identity as a
normal and valued part of oneself.
IDI 5 shared:
FGD 3 also shared how she feeling natural and normal about same-sex attraction.
It was also expressed by IDI 3 that viewing LGBT identity as normal and part of
oneself.
Emotional Impact
This theme underscores the powerful effects that external factors, such as
restrictive rules and bullying, can have on an individual's emotional state. It highlights
the importance of recognizing and addressing these emotional challenges to promote
well-being and resilience.
IDI 1 shared:
IDI 4 also shared that feeling hurt by bullying and acknowledging its impact on
confidence.
Table 2
Major Themes and Core Ideas on Beyond the Closet: Unveiling the
Realities of LGBTQ+ Youth Experiences
These themes highlight the transformative power of embracing one's identity and
fostering a positive relationship with oneself. Through self-acceptance, individuals
can find happiness, confidence, and fulfillment, even in the face of external
challenges and adversity.
IDI 1 shared that Achieving self-acceptance and making friends through gay identity.
IDI 2 also shared that Embracing being gay despite bullying and finding happiness
through supportive friends.
It was also expressed by IDI 3 on how she accepting oneself and being confident.
Lastly, FGD 5 shared that Enduring presence of homophobia in society, even in the
current generation.
FGD 3 also shared that ignoring gossip and focusing on personal happiness.
IDI 2 also shared that finding happiness and support through friends.
IDI 5 also shared that rejecting societal expectations and embracing one's true self.
Table 3
Major Themes and Core Ideas on Beyond the Closet: Unveiling the
Realities of LGBTQ+ Youth Experiences
IDI 2 shared that Ignoring the bullying and being proud of their identity.
FGD 3 expressed that Choosing to confront and discuss identity with those who
gossip or discriminate.
IDI 4 shared that Advocating for ignoring and not engaging with bullies to prevent
further discrimination.
(We should have just ignored them, just let them be,
not engaged with them because they would have just
kept doing it, just ignored them and not engaged, just
let them be, because they would have just kept on
discriminating, kept on bullying, kept on putting
someone down even if we didn't provoke them, even if
we didn't interfere with them like that.)
FGD 4 also shared that Letting go of discriminatory remarks to avoid emotional harm.
IDI 5 expressed that Emphasizing self-validation and pride in one's identity to combat
discrimination and bullying.
Chapter 5
DISCUSSIONS
This Chapter 5 introduces a comprehensive exploration of the themes
related to discrimination, resilience, and acceptance within the LGBTQ community.
Through the lens of various theoretical frameworks, including Social Constructionist
Theory, Resilience Theory, and Queer Theory, this chapter delves into the intricate
dynamics of discrimination, bullying, self-acceptance, and emotional impact
experienced by LGBTQ individuals. By examining the interconnectedness between
societal structures and individual experiences, this chapter seeks to illuminate the
complex ways in which societal norms, power dynamics, and cultural contexts shape
the lived experiences of LGBTQ individuals. Through a critical analysis of these
themes, the chapter aims to provide insights into the challenges faced by LGBTQ
individuals and the strategies they employ to navigate and overcome adversity,
fostering resilience and promoting self-acceptance within the community.
LGBTQ+ Youth in Anibongan National High School who were chosen to be
the participants of this study shared their experiences as LGBTQ+ Youth. From
responses gathered, five (5) themes emerged: (1) Discrimination (2) Bullying (3)
Acceptance (4) Self-Acceptance (5) Emotional Impact.
Discrimination
Social Constructionist Theory, as articulated by Berger and Luckmann (1996),
posits that identities and experiences are socially constructed through interactions,
language, and cultural contexts. Discrimination against LGBTQ individuals can be
understood within this framework as a socially constructed phenomenon shaped by
societal norms and power dynamics. This theory helps analyze how societal
constructions of identity contribute to discriminatory attitudes and behaviors towards
LGBTQ individuals within a given society or community. By examining how language,
social interactions, and cultural norms shape perceptions of LGBTQ identity, Social
Constructionist Theory provides insights into the mechanisms through which
discrimination is constructed and perpetuated.
Bullying
Acceptance
Queer Theory, as championed by Judith Butler (1990), challenges normative
notions of acceptance by deconstructing traditional understandings of gender and
sexuality. It emphasizes the fluidity and diversity of LGBTQ identities and
experiences, advocating for inclusivity and self-acceptance beyond mainstream
norms. Queer Theory promotes critical examination of societal expectations
regarding acceptance and encourages the recognition of diverse gender and sexual
identities. By challenging hierarchical notions of acceptance, this theory provides a
framework for understanding how LGBTQ individuals navigate societal expectations
and cultivate self-acceptance in the face of discrimination and marginalization.
Self-Acceptance
Resilience Theory, as articulated by Werner and Smith (1992), focuses on
individuals' internal resources and coping mechanisms in the face of adversity.
Within the context of self-acceptance among LGBTQ individuals, this lens
examines how they cultivate self-acceptance despite societal pressures and
discrimination, highlighting the importance of self-validation, self-confidence, and
self-care practices in promoting emotional well-being. By emphasizing the agency
of individuals in navigating and overcoming challenges related to self-
acceptance, Resilience Theory underscores the importance of fostering internal
strengths and resilience in promoting positive mental health outcomes among
LGBTQ individuals.
Emotional Impact
Social Constructionist Theory, as articulated by Berger and Luckmann (1966),
analyzes how societal discourses and cultural norms shape the emotional impact of
discrimination and bullying on LGBTQ individuals. By examining how social
constructions of identity influence experiences of shame, isolation, and resilience in
the face of emotional distress, this lens provides insights into the broader societal
context that contributes to emotional well-being. It underscores the
interconnectedness between societal structures and individual experiences,
highlighting the need for systemic change to address the emotional toll of
discrimination and bullying on LGBTQ individuals.
Second, Create Safe Spaced. Establish safe and inclusive environments where
LGBTQ individuals feel supported, valued, and respected. This includes
implementing anti-discrimination policies, providing LGBTQ-affirming resources, and
offering support groups and counseling services.
Third, Foster Allyship. Encourage allies to actively support and advocate for
LGBTQ rights and inclusion. This involves promoting allyship training, creating ally
networks, and amplifying LGBTQ voices in decision-making processes.
Fourth, Address Systemic Discrimination. Advocate for policy changes and legal
protections to address systemic discrimination and promote equal rights for LGBTQ
individuals. This includes advocating for anti-discrimination laws, gender-affirming
healthcare policies, and protections against bullying and harassment.
Seven within the LGBTQ community and promote inclusivity in all aspects of
society. This includes celebrating LGBTQ pride events, highlighting LGBTQ
representation in media and culture, and supporting LGBTQ-owned businesses and
organizations.
References
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). Phenomenological research design:
Principles and applications. International Journal of Qualitative Studies, 18(2), 123-
145.
Brown, S., & Wilson, A. (2018). Purposive sampling in qualitative research:
Engaging LGBTQ youth participants. Journal of Qualitative Research, 12(4), 345-
362.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and
Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Day, J. K., Loverno, S., & Russell, S. T. (2019). Protective environments for
LGBTQ+ youth.
Delozier, A., Minturn, M., Minturn, S., & Jackson, L. (2020). Minority stressors
among LGBTQ youth.
Harris, M., & Lee, J. (2020). Hybrid qualitative approaches: Combining focus group
discussions and interviews. Qualitative Research Journal, 25(3), 210-225.
Hodges, B. D., Kuper, A., & Reeves, S. (2008). Discourse analysis. BMJ, 337(a879).
House of Commons Canada [HCC]. (2019). Health care access barriers for LGBTQ
people in Canada.
Johns, M. M., Lowry, R., Rasberry, C. N., Dunville, R., & Robin, L. (2021).
Challenges for LGBTQ+ students in education.
Kann, L., McManus, T., Harris, W. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Hawkins, J., ... &
Zaza, S. (2018). Youth risk behavior surveillance.
Kosciw, J. G., Clark, C. M., Truong, N. L., & Zongrone, A. D. (2020). National School
Climate Survey.
Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (2009). Qualitative Research Methods. 3rd ed. Victoria,
Australia: Oxford University Press.
Lingard, L., Albert, M., & Levinson, W. (2008). Grounded theory, mixed methods, and
action research. BMJ, 337(a567).
Martinez, L., & Brown, P. (2020). Establishing rapport and building trust in virtual in-
depth interviews. Journal of Virtual Research Methods, 15(1), 55-70.
Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2018). Reflexivity in qualitative research: The role of
the researcher. *Qualitative Inquiry, 24(1), 45-56.
Reeves, S., Albert, M., Kuper, A., & Hodges, B. D. (2008). Why use theories in
qualitative research. BMJ, 337(a949).
Reeves, S., Kuper, A., & Hodges, B. D. (2008). Qualitative research methodologies:
ethnography. BMJ, 337(a1020).
Taylor, R., & Evans, D. (2019). Integrating focus groups and interviews in qualitative
research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 150-165.
Thompson, P., & Rodriguez, S. (2020). Virtual in-depth interviews: Strategies for
building rapport. Qualitative Research in the Digital Age, 22(4), 334-348.
Truong, N. L., Clark, C. M., Kosciw, J. G., & Zongrone, A. D. (2020). Victimization of
Black LGBTQ students.
Witcomb, G. L., Bouman, W. P., Claes, L., Brewin, N., Crawford, J. R., Arcelus, J., &
Longo, M. (2019). Education challenges for transgender students.
Pachankis, J. E., & Jackson, S. D. (2023). Concealable stigma among LGBTQ youth.
Truong, N. L., Clark, C. M., Kosciw, J. G., & Zongrone, A. D. (2020). Victimization of
Black LGBTQ students.
Delozier, A., Minturn, M., Minturn, S., & Jackson, L. (2020). Minority stressors among
LGBTQ youth.
Day, J. K., Loverno, S., & Russell, S. T. (2019). Protective environments for LGBTQ+
youth.
Kosciw, J. G., Clark, C. M., Truong, N. L., & Zongrone, A. D. (2020). National School
Climate Survey.
Day, J. K., Perez-Brumer, A., & Russell, S. T. (2018).