Registered / Certified Mail Number: RE XXX XXX XXX US

First-Middle: Last for

FIRST MIDDLE LAST, Estate
c/o 1234 Your Address Lane
City / Town, State Republic [12345]
Principal
ATT’N: C.F.O. for
COMPANY NAME HERE
1234 THEIR ADDRESS ST.
CITY / TOWN, ST 12345
Respondent

Date Goes Here, 2024

RE: CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE FOR PROOF OF CLAIM

UPON CORPORATION’S CONTRACT, FOR DETERMINATION OF ‘MEETING
OF THE MINDS’, ‘FRAUD ON THE CONTRACT’, AND/OR AN
‘UNCONSCIONABLE CONTRACT’ AND/OR AGREEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL
DISCHARGE, Account # xxxxxxxxxxx

Dear Mr. / Ms. C.F.O.:

I am in receipt of and conditionally accept for value (honor) your statement for Month, dated
Approx. DATE Presentment Sent to You from Company. A copy of your letter/document is
enclosed.

It has come to my attention that, as applied to the above matter, there may not have been a
true, qualified ‘meeting of the minds’- that there may be fraud or misrepresentation on the
contract, and/or the contract itself may be an unconscionable contract, or other controversies may
exist within this contract/transaction.
As I want to resolve this matter as soon as possible, I am initiating this private, administrative
remedy to determine such matters, and I agree to continue making payments predicated upon
your ‘proof of claim’.
The necessary ‘Proofs of Claim’ are set out below, to wit:

1. PROOF OF CLAIM that Respondent gave FULL DISCLOSURE to all matters

dealing with said contract as to the U.S. bankruptcy, form of payment, what was loaned,
etc.;
2. PROOF OF CLAIM that the agent sending the Undersigned a DEMAND FOR
PAYMENT OF DEBT letter via U.S. Mail does not constitute a mailing of a fraudulent
claim and/or committing mail fraud (U.S.C. Title 13, Sect. 1331);
3. PROOF OF CLAIM that Respondent, as an ‘artificial entity / creature’ created under
the laws of the STATE OF YOUR STATE and doing business in the STATE OF
YOUR STATE, by and through its officers, board of directors, employees, and agents
are not bound to support Article I, Section X, of the U.S. Constitution that, as a ‘state-
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE -------------------- Pg. 1 of 5
created entity’, reads, “No State shall… make any Thing but gold and silver Coin as
Legal Tender in Payment of Debts”, and that any such thing in lieu of gold and silver
coin exists as legal tender in payment of debts;
4. PROOF OF CLAIM that of the value (substance) demanded in the DEMAND FOR
PAYMENT OF DEBT is in the nature of a Valuable Consideration called ‘money’ and
is in compliance with Title 31 UNITED STATES CODE § 371 and 12 UNITED
STATES CODE § 152;
5. PROOF OF CLAIM that Respondent inquired or knew that the Undersigned had, or
has access to, ‘lawful money of account’ to ‘pay’ the contract debt(s) at law without
becoming a tort feasor.
6. PROOF OF CLAIM that the Undersigned had/has access to ‘money’ that constitutes
‘lawful consideration’;
7. PROOF OF CLAIM that the use of a (Federal Reserve) ‘Note’ or instruments
certifying conveyance of Federal Reserve Notes is not only a promise to pay. See Fidelity
Savings v. Grimes, 131 P2d 894;
8. PROOF OF CLAIM that Legal Tender (Federal Reserve Notes), or instruments
certifying conveyance of Federal Reserve Notes, are good and lawful money of the
United States. See Rains v. State, 226 S.W. 189;
9. PROOF OF CLAIM that Federal Reserve Notes or instruments certifying conveyance
of Federal Reserve Notes are not valueless. See I.R.S. Codes Section 1.1001-1 (4657)
C.C.H. (Note: Federal Reserve Bank says “Federal Reserve Notes… have no value.”);
10. PROOF OF CLAIM that Federal Reserve Notes or instruments certifying conveyance
of Federal Reserve Notes do operate as payment in the absence of an agreement that they
shall constitute payment. See Blackshear Mfg. Co. v. Harrell, 12 S.E. 2d 766;
11. PROOF OF CLAIM that the Undersigned had a ‘meeting of the minds’ with
Respondent pursuant to the contract / agreement with respect to full disclosure and that
said contract contained or contains no elements of fraud by Respondent;
12. PROOF OF CLAIM that Respondent did not make their contract/agreement beyond
the scope of its corporate powers, and the contract is not unlawful and void. For
reference, see McCormick v. Market Natl. Bank, 165 U.S. 538);
13. PROOF OF CLAIM that the Negotiable Instrument Law was not designed to cover
commercial paper which IS the currency. La. Stat. Ann. –R.S., 71 et. seq. LSA-C.C., Art.
2139 (refer to the Affidavit of Walker Todd);
14. PROOF OF CLAIM that Respondent did not loan their ‘credit’ and that the
Undersigned is not only obligated to pay back in something other than ‘like kind’, i.e.,
debt instruments;
15. PROOF OF CLAIM that the U.S. bankruptcy did not impair the obligations and
considerations of contracts through the “Joint Resolution to Suspend the Gold Standard
and Abrogate the Gold Clause” of June 5, 1933 as it may operate within the STATE OF
YOUR STATE;
16. PROOF OF CLAIM that the STATE OF STATE did not adopt, in some capacity, the
Uniform Commercial Code and that all transactions included but not limited to courts are
governed under the U.C.C. and/or the Negotiable Instrument Law as designed to cover
commercial paper which is currency. La. Stat. Ann. –R.S., 71 et. seq. LSA-C.C., Art.
2139;

CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE -------------------- Pg. 2 of 5

17. PROOF OF CLAIM that under the Negotiable Instrument Law, ‘commercial Paper’
not limited to Bills of Exchange are not ‘money’ (currency) in respect to the National
Emergency and the Uniform Commercial Code and are not to be accepted to discharge
debt;
18. PROOF OF CLAIM that the Undersigned cannot accept for value any public or
private presentment, invoice, Bill, etc. for fine, fee, tax, debt, or judgment and discharge
the same with a Bill of exchange or other commercial paper as necessary to carry on
commerce;
19. PROOF OF CLAIM that Respondent, by and through its employees, knew or did not
know that this transaction was beyond the scope of its Charter and that Respondent did
not intend to bind the Undersigned to an unconscionable contract;
20. PROOF OF CLAIM that Respondent, by and through its employees and agents, did
not commit fraud on the contract in respect to the account / contract referenced above in
any capacity;
21. PROOF OF CLAIM that your DEMAND FOR PAYMENT OF DEBT letter does
not, therefore, constitute an attempt by Respondent at unjust enrichment;
22. PROOF OF CLAIM that the commercial instrument or Bill of Exchange tendered was
not refused and returned within three days pursuant to Nygaard v. Continental Resources,
Inc. (598 N.W. 2d 851 (1991), 39 U.C.C. 2d 851) “The court held that, under 2-511 (2),
tender of payment is sufficient when it is made by means current in the ordinary course of
business, unless the seller demands payment in legal tender. Here, Nygaard spoke to
Continental several times after receipt of the sight draft and never requested payment in
legal tender. Payment to extend the lease was due by January 4, 1988, and the rejection of
the sight draft did not occur until January 8, 1998. Nygaard rejection was, thus, untimely
and tender of sight draft was sufficient to extend the lease.” (emphasis added); and
23. PROOF OF CLAIM that the Undersigned, as the authorized representative of the
Debtor, does not have the standing or capacity to accept for value the offer / contract /
presentment and discharge the same via Bill of Exchange or other appropriate
commercial paper for discharge via the remedy provided by Congress, HJR-192 of June
5, 1933 and under Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code.

General acquiescence or non-response by Respondent to provide the above ‘Proofs of

Claim’ will constitute agreement and formal acceptance. Respondent will have, by your non-
response, failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Otherwise, it shall operate as
general acquiescence relative to this presentment. Respondent will have admitted there is no
valid Claim of Action arising via contract and/or compelling the Undersigned into an
unconscionable contract and that there was no meeting of the minds in respect to the alleged
contract.

You will have formally accepted each and every fact herein as they operate in favor of the
Undersigned due to your silence, and estoppel is in effect.

You admit to your non-response to bring forth ‘Proof of Claim’ in support of a ‘clean hands
doctrine’, ‘full disclosure’, ‘good faith dealing’ pursuant to the FAIR DEBT
COLLECTIONS PRACTICES ACT as it may apply to your presentment in regards to this
transaction / contract as referenced above.
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE -------------------- Pg. 3 of 5
Therein, presumption will be taken in regards to your refusal, failure, default, and dishonor,
admission, and confession of injury and damage and failure to state a claim by you, Respondent.
This ‘Conditional Acceptance’ becomes the security agreement under commercial law, or in the
alternative, you agree and stipulate that the Undersigned can only discharge the demand payment
letter / Bill / presentment / etc. with a Bill of Exchange or other appropriate commercial paper
and that Respondent will accept said instrument as tendered to discharge the debt under
necessity.

If the previous ‘instrument’ (Bill of Exchange) was tendered and not accepted, you
agree that the matter / account / debt is discharged as an operation of law in tender of
payment and/or bankruptcy.

Due to the time-sensitive nature of this private matter, under necessity, you are to respond
with ‘Proof of Claim’ within ten (10) days, plus three (3) days grace granted by return service
by certified priority return mail to Principal’s address and to the Third Party’s address below.

Should you fail or refuse by non-response to provide ‘Proof of Claim’ within the time frame
specified in this private matter, general acquiescence and acceptance will be taken on your part
as formally exercised and performed pursuant to your silence and dishonor.

This agreement shall have the effect of an instrument under seal.

Sincerely,
Without Prejudice
Authorized Representative, Attorney-in-Fact

_______________________________________
First-Middle: Last – Secured Party Creditor
For FIRST MIDDLE LAST©, ENS LEGIS

Third Party’s Address:

Notary Mailer Name **or witness**
5432 Notary Address Drive
City, State [12345]

NOTICE

CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE -------------------- Pg. 4 of 5

Using a notary on this document does not constitute any adhesion, nor does it alter my status in
any manner. The purpose for notarization is verification and identification only and not for
entrance into any foreign jurisdiction.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Example County )
) ss.
Your State )

As a Notary Public for said County and State, I do hereby certify that on this _________ day of
Month, 2024, that First Middle Last, the above-mentioned, appeared before me and executed the
foregoing. Witness my hand and seal:

Notary Signature: _______________________________________

_______________

NOTARY SEAL

My Commission Expires: ________________

CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE -------------------- Pg. 5 of 5