WEND9-7F Carriage Requirements
WEND9-7F Carriage Requirements
about
charts and carriage
requirements
Primar Stavanger – IC-ENC
Working Group on information
(PSIWG)
1st edition - November 2004
Kort & Matrikelstyrelsen
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Where are the rules for professional marine navigation written down? . . . . . . . . . . .6
What are the IMO requirements for the carriage of nautical charts? . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
What is a nautical chart? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
What kinds of chart and chart data are available? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
What are official charts? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
What is an official ENC? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
How do I recognise an official ENC? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10
Where can I get official ENCs? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10
How are official ENCs protected? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
What is an official RNC? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
How are charts kept up-to-date? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
What is ECDIS? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
How is an ECDIS approved and by whom? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
Meeting Carriage Requirements with ECDIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
What to do in areas without official ENC coverage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
What are the requirements for the safe use of ECDIS ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
What is ECS? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19
Final remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
ANNEX I Glossary/list of abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
ANNEX II Comparison of paper charts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
ANNEX III Types of Digital Charts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35
ANNEX IV IMO SN/Circ. 207 Differences between RCDS and ECDIS . . . . . . . . . .47
ANNEX V ECDIS - Procedural and organisational considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . .49
ANNEX VI Compendium on Flag State ECDIS requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53
Feed back from people involved in the use of charts and electronic chart display
equipment covering manufacturers, distributors, users, ship owners, regulatory authorities
pilots, harbour authorities and others reveal a significant uncertainty about status and
regulations applying to the products and equipment available in the market today. In
particular the differences between the status of the various types of equipment and the
differences between the various types of data offered to the users are unclear with respect
to the regulations in place.
This compendium of facts about chart carriage requirements has been compiled to serve
as a reference frame to help resolve the uncertainties existing today.
This document does not replace or amend national or international rules and regulations.
Ship owners should always refer to their national administrations / flag states for the latest
information.
This compendium consists of a main document and a number of Annexes. The main
document contains a description of various aspects of charts and electronic chart display
equipment in the form of questions and answers in a short form. The main emphasis is
on what can be used to satisfy the SOLAS carriage requirements for charts.
The Annexes contain more detailed and additional information of the different types of
equipment and the different types of digital data available today.
Acknowledgements:
Kind assistance to ensure relevance and readability provided by:
BIMCO, Primar Stavanger and IC-ENC.
Definitions
A navigational electronic chart system is a general term for all electronic equipment that is
capable of displaying a vessel’s position on a chart image on a screen.
ECDIS:
ECDIS equipment is specified in the IMO ECDIS Performance Standards as follows:
Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) means a navigation information system
which, with adequate back up arrangements, can be accepted as complying with the up-to-date chart
required by regulation V/19 & V/27 of the 1974 SOLAS Convention.
Where the term ECDIS is used in this document, this is to be understood as those
navigational electronic chart systems, which have been tested, approved and certified as
compliant with the IMO ECDIS Performance Standards and other relevant IMO
Performance standards and thus is compliant with SOLAS ECDIS requirements
ECS:
ECS is specified in ISO 19379 as follows:
ECS is a navigation information system that electronically displays vessel position and relevant
nautical chart data and information from an ECS Database on a display screen, but does not meet all
the IMO requirements for ECDIS and is not intended to satisfy the SOLAS Chapter V requirements to
carry a navigational chart.
ECS equipment ranges from simple hand held GPS enabled devices to sophisticated
stand-alone computer equipment interfaced to ship systems.
IMO member states are obliged to adopt IMO rules and regulations into their national
legislation. However, only when the convention text has been incorporated into national
legislation does it take effect for the individual ships registered in that country. This
process of incorporation into national legislation may vary from a few months to several
years.
The country in which a ship is registered and hence which flag it is flying is known as the
Flag State. It is the national maritime administration representing the flag state, which
controls the adherence to the SOLAS carriage requirements (Flag State control).
The national maritime administration is also responsible for port state control. Ships
arriving at a port may be subject to port state control by local officials based on flag state
regulations and international agreements. Port states cooperate within regions to apply
consistent standards, for example the European nations and Canada cooperate under the
umbrella of the Paris Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).
What are the IMO requir rements for the carriage of nautical charts?
The requirements for carriage of nautical charts are laid down in SOLAS Chapter V.
The relevant regulations are:
• Regulation 2, defines the nautical chart
• Regulation 191, specifies the equipment to be carried on different types of ships and
• Regulation 27, specifies the requirement to keep charts and publications up-to-date.
1
Applies to ships constructed on or after 1 July 2002. Ships constructed before 1 July 2002 may
comply with regulations V/11, V/12 and V/20 of SOLAS in force prior to 1 July 2002. Regulation V/20
contains the chart carriage requirements.
* An appropriate folio of paper nautical charts may be used as a back-up arrangement for ECDIS. Other back-up arrangements
for ECDIS are acceptable (see appendix 6 to resolution A.817(19), as amended).
From the three regulations referred to in the box above the requirements for charts and
publications to be carried can be fulfilled by
1) Carriage of official and up-to-date paper charts, or
2) Carriage of a type-approved ECDIS, using official and up-to-date Electronic
Navigational Charts (ENC) together with an appropriate back up arrangement.
The minimum carriage requirements for charts and publications are satisfied by the use
of paper products. After the amendment of SOLAS regulations 1 July 2002 it is allowed
to replace the paper charts and publications by electronic means if a suitable back up is
provided. Paper charts and publications continue to be the minimum requirement for
back up purposes.
A raster chart is basically just a scanned and passive image of a paper chart, where a
vector chart corresponds to a digital analysis by object (points, lines, areas etc.)
RASTER VECTOR
• Original charts, established from hydrographic and other surveys and produced by the
relevant national authority;
• “Facsimile” charts, are exact reproductions or copies of original charts. In some cases
however the facsimile may be ”modified” to the publishers language and adapted to
the distinct style of the publisher. In these circumstances the hydrographic content of
the chart remains unchanged; and
• Recompiled charts, reproduced from original charts. The recompilation may be to a
different scale, omitting information from the original chart and changing the
appearance of the original chart.
Recompiled and facsimile charts will be delayed in publication time compared to the
original charts. There is no synchronisation between the Notices to Mariners for the
original charts and Notices to Mariners for recompiled or facsimile charts produced by
other nations.
All other nautical charts are by definition not official and are often referred to as private
charts. These charts are not accepted as the basis for navigation under the SOLAS
convention.
ENC stands for “Electronic Navigational Chart”. The term was originally introduced for
digital chart data complying with the IHO chart data transfer standard S-57. By IMO
definition ENCs can only be produced by or on the authority of a government authorised
Hydrographic Office or other relevant government institution; however the term ENC is
not protected and has been widely (and incorrectly) used by private organisations to refer
to their own products. To avoid possible confusion the word “official” has been used as a
prefix to ENC in this document.
See section “Meeting carriage requirements for ECDIS” below and Annex III for further
details.
Further the mariner can use an ECDIS function to interrogate the chart display to obtain
the chart details like information on originator, edition number and status of updating.
This catalogue indicates that a considerable number of ENCs have been or are being
produced by Hydrographic Offices. It also shows that only a part of the issued data has
been released and made available to the market.
The illustration below shows the front page of the catalogue, which can be found at the
IHO web-site at www.iho.shom.fr, look under “ENC”.
The protection standard enables the end user systems to check the authenticity of the
supplied information and verify that it is official ENC data. This feature can also be used
to distinguish between official ENCs and unofficial vector data in the market.
Reprint A reprint is an updated version of an existing chart. A reprint is done when the
chart is out of stock, and the reprint will incorporate the latest Notices to
Mariners. The previous version remains valid if continuously
updated by Notices to Mariners.
New Edition A new edition is an existing chart, which has been updated with information that
cannot be applied by the mariner based on Notices to Mariners. Usually a new
edition is issued when new survey information has been included or very complex
changes to buoys and other aids to navigation etc. have been applied. A new
edition of a chart will always supersede the previous edition, which will be
withdrawn. a withdrawn chart no longer meets the carriage requirements.
New chart Occasionally new information will require a change of coverage or content of a
chart; in this case a new chart of revised limits or scale will be issued. If the
previous chart has been withdrawn, it no longer meets carriage requirements.
A standard function of ECDIS is the capability of updating the ENC manually on the
screen. Objects retrieved from the Notices to Mariners and applied manually to the ENC
are marked on the ENC display with an additional orange indicator.
2
IMO Resolution A817(19) as amended (1.9 and Annex 7)
Verification of the application of updates can be found in the list of updates already
applied, which the ECDIS is required to keep. Should all available ENCs show the same
date for the latest update, it is likely that they have not been updated regularly, and the
distributor should be contacted for verification. Furthermore it is possible to use
traditional sources of information, such as Notices to Mariners, to verify updates.
What is ECDIS?
ECDIS equipment is specified in the IMO ECDIS Performance Standards (IMO
Resolution A.817 (19)) as follows:
Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) means a navigation information system
which, with adequate back up arrangements, can be accepted as complying with the up-to-date chart
required by regulation V/19 & V/27 of the 1974 SOLAS Convention, by displaying selected information
from a system electronic navigational chart (SENC) with positional information from navigation
sensors to assist the mariner in route planning and route monitoring, and by displaying additional
navigation-related information if required.
ECDIS is a ship borne navigational device and as such it is the responsibility of IMO. It
must support the whole range of navigational functions that make use of the
characteristics of the chart data and their specific presentation. Moreover, to be an
ECDIS the equipment must be shown to meet all the requirements of the IMO
performance standards (IMO Resolution A.817(19)) and offer, besides the graphic
presentation of chart data, additional information about the characteristics of the
displayed features.
Within the ECDIS, the ENC database stores the chart information in the form of
geographic objects represented by point, line and area shapes, carrying individual
attributes, which make any of these objects unique. Appropriate mechanisms are built
into the system to query the data, and then to use the obtained information to perform
certain navigational functions (e.g. the anti-grounding surveillance).
The presentation of the current position, range/bearing functions and route planning
capabilities are other examples of the minimum ECDIS requirements laid down in the
IMO Performance Standards for ECDIS.
The presentation of official ENCs on the screen is specified in another IHO standard, the
”Colours and Symbols Specifications for ECDIS IHO S-52”, i.e. in its Appendix 2,
called ”ECDIS Presentation Library”. This style of presentation is mandatory.
The use of official ENCs in a tested, approved and certified ECDIS and with appropriate
back up arrangements, is the only paperless chart option for vessel navigation.
At the request of IMO, the IEC established the operational methods of testing for an
IMO-compliant ECDIS. For each of the sections contained in the IMO Performance
Standards for ECDIS, IEC developed appropriate test requirements, procedures and
required test results.
Recognized organisations are making use of this test standard to conduct their type
approval process.
This also applies to each of the various ECDIS related specifications provided in the
current versions of IHO S-52 and IHO S-57 and associated appendices. The IEC ECDIS
Test Standard is contained in IEC Publication 61174. In addition IEC 61174 refers to the
application of other test standards to an ECDIS. In particular to IEC 60945, containing
general requirements for robustness of the device against environmental influences and
for software design, and IEC 61162 for data interfacing.
Where official ENCs are not yet available, IMO regulations allow Flag States to authorise
the use of official raster charts (together with an appropriate folio of paper charts) - see
section below.
In all other cases the vessel must carry all paper charts necessary for its intended voyage.
However, in order to replace paper charts, such systems must fulfil considerable technical
requirements:
• The chart data in use must be official (i.e. official ENCs where available);
• The graphic display on the screen must meet the equipment-independent specification;
and
• The equipment must support the full range of navigational functions that can be
performed on the traditional paper charts.
Back up requirements
No electronic system is completely failsafe. IMO Performance Standards therefore
require that the ”overall system” include both a primary ECDIS and an adequate
independent back up arrangement that provides:
• Independent facilities enabling a safe take over of the ECDIS functions in order to
ensure that a system failure does not result in a critical situation; and
• A means to provide for safe navigation for the remaining part of the voyage in case of
ECDIS failure.
However, these rather basic statements allow considerable leeway and there are various
interpretations as to what are the minimum functional requirements, or what constitute
”adequate” back up arrangements.
IMO added Appendix 6 to the performance standards for ECDIS back up requirements,
which lists the required functions and availability requirements of back up arrangements,
including;
• Chart information using the latest official edition that are kept up-to-date for the entire
voyage;
• Route planning capable of performing route planning functions, including taking over
the route plan of the primary system, and adjusting a planned route;
• Route monitoring enabling take-over of the route monitoring function originally
performed by the primary system, including plotting own ship’s position and displaying
the planned route; and
• Voyage recording that keeps a record of the ship’s actual track, including positions and
corresponding times.
The definition of these key functional requirements still leaves open what technical
solutions constitute adequate back up arrangements.
For this reason ship owners should consult their national maritime administration for
specific advice.
IMO took note of the limitations of RNCs as compared to ENCs5, and the revised
ECDIS Performance Standards require that the ECDIS must be used together with “an
appropriate folio of up-to-date paper charts” for the areas where RCDS mode is
employed. The intention was to allow the number of paper charts carried by a vessel to
be reduced where RCDS mode was employed, but only to a level compatible with safe
navigation. No definition of an “appropriate folio” was provided by IMO and
consequently different Flag States developed individual interpretations.
In areas where ENCs or RNCs are not available vessels must carry all paper
charts necessary for the intended voyage.
3
IMO Resolution A477(XII), as amended by MSC64(67)
4
IMO Resolution A.817 (19) as amended; 1.9 and Appendix 7
5
See IMO SN/Circ.207 in Annex IV for further details
16 Facts about chart carriage reguirements
Does your ECDIS system Meet Carriage Requirements?
(1) Some Flag States may require specific documentation to allow this.
(2) Requires approval of vessel’s Flag State – Flag State defines meaning of ‘appropriate’
(3) Back up system is only required if ECDIS is intended to meet carriage requirements
(4) For ECDIS to fulfil Carriage requirements vessels must use ENCs where these are available
(5) Paper charts (not the ECDIS) must remain the primary means of Navigation
(6) If private charts are used in an ECDIS the system is regarded as operating as an ECS. ECDIS operating as ECS, ECS systems
meeting RTCM standards or Private charts meeting ISO standards being used in ECDIS do not meet carriage requirements.
In Europe the port state control acts on the regulations set out in the Paris Memorandum
of Understanding. Its ECDIS guidelines explain how a port state control Officer (PSCO)
should assess whether a ship is using electronic charts in accordance with SOLAS
requirements. Checks may include whether:
• The ship has documentation indicating that the system complies with IMO
Performance Standards for ECDIS. In the absence of such documentation, the PSCO
should seek confirmation from the Flag State that the system does meet the statutory
requirements;
• The system is being used for primary navigation. It should be established if ECDIS is
The ECDIS changes the way work is done on the bridge of a vessel. This requires careful
analysis of the facilities and specifications of the installed equipment, hereunder the
navigational sensors and the data they acquire and of the rules and regulations applicable
to the system and its use in navigation in particular. It requires that the need for new
bridge procedures is analysed in view of the change of work processes introduced by the
equipment and it requires an appreciation of the human element.
A list of bridge work-processes that are affected by changing to an ECDIS, and which
may require that procedures are amended or developed is found in Annex V. This list
includes some points for analysis and consideration.
What is ECS?
All systems, which are not tested to show compliance with the ECDIS Performance
Standards, can be generically designated as ”Electronic Chart Systems” (ECS). An ECS
may be able to use either official ENCs, RNCs or other chart data produced privately
and could have functionality similar to ECDIS.
Some ECS equipment manufacturers also produce vector and raster data to use in their
products. These suppliers have been producing private chart data for a number of years
and have established themselves in the market. They were the pioneers and have
established the idea and the use of electronic chart systems on vessels. Their charts are
derived from Hydrographic Office paper charts or Hydrographic Office digital data.
Hydrographic Offices do not take any responsibility for the accuracy or reliability of
privately produced charts.
Where the vessel operates with ECS, the paper chart remains the official basis for
navigation onboard. The vessel must retain and use a full folio of up-to-date paper charts
onboard, regardless of the type of electronic charts used.
Because ECS is not intended to meet SOLAS requirements, there are no IMO
Performance Standards6 for ECS.
6
The International Organisation for Standardization (ISO) has developed a Standard for ECS
databases (=ECS Charts). Document ISO 19379. The Radio Technical Commission For Maritime
Services (RTCM) has developed a recommended Performance Standard for ECS (=ECS
Equipment). RTCM Paper 100-2002/SC109-STD. None of these standards are recognized by the
IMO.
The STCW and ISM codes put the responsibility firmly on the shipowner to ensure that
mariners on their vessels are competent to carry out the duties they are expected to
perform. If a ship has ECS fitted, the shipowner has a duty to ensure that users of such a
system are properly trained in the operation and use of electronic charts, are aware of the
limitations compared to ECDIS and are familiar with the shipboard equipment before
using it operationally at sea.
Final remarks
This document is a first version of an information document aimed at giving the
international shipping society a compendium, which provides factual information on
chart carriage requirements, paper charts and digital charts and chart display equipment.
Feedback from the readers of this document will be welcomed in the continuing process
of improving the contents.
Feedback may be adressed to any of the Hydrographic Offices listed in the Introduction.
Normative References
• International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974 as amended
• IMO Resolution A817(19): Performance Standards for ECDIS;
• IEC 61174 (2001-10): Electronic chart display and information system (ECDIS) -
Operational and performance requirements, methods of testing and required test
results
• IEC 60945: Maritime navigation and radiocommunication equipment and systems –
General requirements – Methods of testing and required test results;
• IEC 61162: Navigation interfaces – Methods of testing and required test results;
• IHO S-57: IHO Transfer Standard for Digital Hydrographic Data, edition 3.1;
• IHO S-52: IHO Colour and Symbols Specifications for ECDIS, edition 4.2;
• IHO S-61: IHO Product Specification for Raster Navigational Charts, edition 1.0;
• IHO S-62: IHO Codes for producing Agencies; and
• IHO S-63: IHO Data Protection Scheme, edition 1.0.
Abbreviation Explanation
AIS Automatic Identification System
ARPA Automatic Radar Plotting Aid
ECS charts Non official (private) chart data (vector or raster)
ECDIS Electronic Chart Display and Information System.
ECS Electronic Chart System (non complying with SOLAS requirements)
ENC Electronic Navigational Chart
GPS Global Positioning System
Hydrographic Office National Hydrographic Office.
IC-ENC International Centre for ENCs, RENC operated by UK Hydrographic
Office
IEC International Electrotechnical Commission
IHO International Hydrographic Organisation
IMO International Maritime Organisation
ISM International Safety Management Code
ISO International Organization for Standardization
NtM Notices to Mariners
MoU Memorandum of Understanding
Primar Stavanger RENC operated by Norwegian Hydrographic Office
PSC Port State Control
PSCO Port State Control Officer
RCDS Raster Chart Display System
RENC Regional ENC Coordination Centre
RNC Raster Navigational Chart
RTCM Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services
S-52 IHO’s special publication No. 52. IHO Colour and Symbols Specifications
for ECDIS
S-57 IHO’s special publication No. 57. IHO Transfer Standard for Digital
Hydrographic Data
S-61 IHO’s special publication No. 61. IHO Product Specification for Raster
Navigational Charts
S-62 IHO’s special publication No. 62. IHO Codes for producing Agencies
S-63 IHO’s Special publication No. 63. IHO Data Protection Scheme
SATCOM Satellite Communication
SENC System ENC
SOLAS IMO’s convention for Safety Of Life At Sea
WEND World ENC Database
WGS84 World Geodetic System 1984
Term Explanation
Validation Process which aims to secure that an ENC is produced
according to IHO standard S-57
BIMCO Worlds largest Association of shipowners and others
representing more than 65% of worlds tonnage
There can be several paper chart series issued officially i.e. by or on the authority of a
government, for a given geographic area. There is normally only one original series; all
others are some form of copy of the original. There is normally no coordination between
the different governments’ paper chart series and no synchronization of the update
frequencies.
The original series are most often produced by the coastal state, but some coastal states
have arrangements with other states to produce the original chart series covering their
waters. Examples are France for parts of the Pacific and some parts of the African coast
and Indian Ocean, the Netherlands for parts of the Caribbean, the United Kingdom for
parts of the Atlantic and Indian Oceans.
Three nations produce and maintain a worldwide chart series. These are the Russian
Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. A number of other
nations produce chart series that cover an area somewhat larger than their own territorial
sea and the immediate adjacent water areas. Examples are France, Japan and Germany.
Except for areas where these nations are producing original chart series, all charts within
their series are either facsimile or recompiled versions of the original charts.
In the modification process changes to the original scale, content and choice of colours may
take place. Delays are likely to appear between the issue of a new edition of the original
chart and the corresponding modified copies. There may also be delays between the issue of
Notices to Mariners for the original charts and those produced for the derived charts series.
Below are a number of examples of an original chart and three modified copies, which
illustrates the variation in the way the chart information is presented. Finally a new
original chart of the same area based on new information.
Chart FI 903 is the source of the three derived charts.To assist in the comparison a square
has been drawn on all examples.
Items to compare within the squares are a.o. amount of detail, choice of symbols and line
styles.The same comparison should be made towards the new chart of the same area, FI 952.
ENC means the database, standardized as to content, structure and format, issued for use with ECDIS
on the authority of government-authorized Hydrographic Offices.
The ENC contains all the chart information useful for safe navigation, and may contain
supplementary information in addition to that contained in the paper, which may be considered
necessary for safe navigation.
Official ENCs are vector charts compiled from a database of individual geo-referenced
objects from Hydrographic Office’s archives including existing paper charts.
When used in an ECDIS, the ENCs content can be displayed as a seamless pattern in
user selected scales presenting user selected chart items. Due to the limited physical size
and the limited resolution of computer monitors the chart image generated from ENCs
does not fully imitate the known appearance of the paper chart. This apparent
disadvantage is compensated by the ENC being a database: special ECDIS operational
functions continuously retrieve the ENC content to give warning of impending danger in
relation to the vessel’s position and its movement.
The current version 3.1 (2004) of S-57 is not limited to ENC compilation, but the
included description of the ENC data format, the ENC product specification and the
ENC updating profile are the most important parts of the standard as it stands today.
World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) are being used a reference frame in all official
ENCs and for GPS as well.
ENC Visualisation
An ENC contains an abstract description of geographic entities but does not contain any
presentation rules. All presentation rules to get the ENCs content displayed are
contained in a separate ECDIS software module - the “Presentation Library”.
Both the geo-referenced objects contained in the ENC and the appropriate symbolisation
contained in the Presentation Library are linked to each other in the ECDIS only when
called up for display. The resulting image will differ depending on the selected sea area,
the intended display scale and the mariner’s pre-settings like ambient light conditions and
other operational conditions.
The definition of the Presentation Library for ENCs is contained in Annex A of the IHO
Special Publication S-52, Appendix 2 “Colours & Symbols Specifications for ECDIS”
(current edition 3.3/2004) and is mandatory for all ECDIS.
The strict separation between the Hydrographic information contained in the ENC,
operational information taken from navigation sensors and their situation related
presentation by means of the Presentation Library gives the flexibility to display the
diversity of ECDIS information, e.g.: physical chart information, (e.g. coastline, depth
contours, buoys),
• Physical chart information, (e.g. coastline, depth contours, buoys);
• Traffic routeing; specified areas; cautions; etc.;
• Supplementary Hydrographic Office information from light list, etc.;
• Mariner's notes; additional local chart information; manufacturer's information;
• Chartwork such as planned route; electronic bearing lines and range rings etc.;
• Own ship's position and course/speed vector; ship's heading and rate of turn; past
track;
• Fix accuracy, or position check from secondary positioning system;
• Possibly, shiphandling options, based on ship's characteristics;
• Alphanumeric navigation information (ship's latitude, longitude, heading, course, etc.);
• Information from radar and other sensors,
• Information from AIS;
• Navigational indications and alarms generated by ECDIS;
• Possibly, telemetered information from shore authorities, (traffic, real-time tides etc.);
• Possibly, ice information;
• Reminders, (e.g. time to contact pilot station); and
• Possibly, a message from other displays (e.g. alarm on engine room display).
Because much experience is embodied in the paper chart, and to avoid confusion in the
extended period while paper charts and RNCs as compared to ENCs co-exist, the two
presentations should be similar wherever possible.
The ECDIS Presentation Library follows that of the paper chart to the widest extent
possible. However, studies and early experience indicated that good visual
communication between the ECDIS display and the user requires more flexibility of
display than is available from paper charts. Consequently some alternative display
methods are being introduced as options in the Presentation Library, e.g.:
The ambient lighting on the bridge varies between the extremes of bright sunlight, which
washes out information on the display, and night, when the light emitted by the display
has to be low enough that it does not affect the mariner’s night vision.
The colour and symbol specifications of S-52 have been designed to meet these difficult
requirements rather than less demanding normal day conditions. Because the ECDIS
display uses emitted light, compared with reflected light for the paper chart, ECDIS must
switch to a negative image of the chart at night, using a dark background in place of the
white background of the paper chart, in order not to impair night vision.
Below are illustrated two different colour schemes and the three standard selections of
content i.e. Standard Display, Base Display and Full Display.
ENC Distribution
The provision of a timely, reliable worldwide uniform ENC data distribution service is a
major organisational challenge. The IHO developed the WEND (World-wide Electronic
Navigational Chart Database) concept to meet these requirements. WEND consists of
two components:
To date, two RENCs – Primar Stavanger, based in Norway and IC-ENC, based in the
United Kingdom, are in operation. However, it has to be noted, that the WEND concept
has not been fully adopted through all ENC producing nations yet. A number of nations
are still distributing their ENCs individually (e.g. Japan Hydrographic Office, Australian
Hydrographic Office, USA - NOAA) either through chart data suppliers or directly.
Principally, WEND focuses on the supply and distribution of ENCs by facilitating the
establishment of services intended to satisfy the SOLAS carriage requirement for up-to-
date charts. Within this primary purpose, ENCs are to be distributed in the encapsulation
described in the S-57 Standard. However, such “plain” S-57 encapsulated ENCs may
become easily subject to unauthorised amendment or illegal copying.
IHO has therefore issued the special publication S-63 “IHO Data Protection Scheme” as
Standard for protection of ENCs by encryption.
What is a SENC?
An ECDIS does not process the ENC content directly for the matter of display. ENCs in
S-57 format are optimised to absorb the Hydrographic object information but this
structure is not adequate for the fast generation of the resulting computer image on the
screen.
In order to get efficient data structures that facilitate the rapid display of ENC data,
ECDIS firstly converts each ENC from S-57 ENC format into an internal format called
SENC – System ENC – which is optimised for chart image creating routines.
Such routines are not standardised; they are part of the individual software know-how of
the ECDIS manufacturers. Consequently the SENC format differs between the ECDIS
of different manufacturers. In contrast to the common uniform ENC format the SENC
format is proprietary for each ECDIS manufacturer.
SENC delivery
The WEND system has established an optional distribution mechanism called SENC
delivery. This is in addition to the standard ENC distribution. In this case, the RENC
delivers the ENCs to a chart data distributor who then performs the ENC-to-SENC
conversion (that otherwise would have to happen inside the ECDIS), and deliver the
SENCs to the end user.
However, it is up to the individual Hydrographic Offices to decide whether they allow the
ENCs for their waters to be distributed in SENC format.
To the date of this publication SENC delivery has only been accepted by a few nations.
It is possible for the ECDIS to determine if the SENC data being displayed is from either
an official ENC or a private source by use of the Agency Code (a two character
combination which is unique for any data producer) embedded in the data.
Using this code the ECDIS is able to inform the mariners that they must navigate with an
official up to date paper chart if SENC data from a private source is in use. The ECDIS
will show a warning on the ECDIS screen:
For the future, to facilitate the display of radar video over official ENCs, it is
recommended that the Hydrographic Offices set the compilation scales of their official
ENCs to be consistent with the standard radar range scales as shown in the following
table:
Updating ENCs
In principle the generation and distribution of regular updates uses identical
organisational structures as for the production and distribution of ENCs described above.
Their frequency is usually synchronised with the chart corrections promulgated with
national Notice to Mariners for the affected sea areas.
Updates may reach the ship via different ways depending from the capabilities of the
service provider and the communication facilities onboard:
• On data distribution media, e.g. CD;
• As e-mail attachment via SATCOM; and
• As broadcast message via SATCOM plus additional communication hardware.
When displayed on an ECDIS screen they appear to be a facsimile of the paper chart
however, they contain significant metadata to ensure that they have certain minimum
functionality; e.g. a means for geo-referencing positions on the chart, automatic updating
of the RNC from digital files (and the ability to show the state of correction) and the
display of the RNC in day or night colours as appropriate.
As a digital copy of the original paper chart, a RNC has no intelligence and other than
visually, cannot be interrogated for e.g. automatic route checking or hazard warnings;
however some of these limitations can be minimised by manual user input to the ECDIS.
RNC Visualisation
• RNCs are designed to be displayed at the same resolution as that which they are
provided. Excessive zooming in or out of the same image seriously degrades the RNC
image. RCDS allows charts of appropriate scale to be displayed; when the user wants
to zoom in then a larger scale chart will be displayed and similarly on zooming out a
smaller scale chart will be used;
• Orientation of the RCDS display to other than north-up (e.g. course-up or route-up),
may affect the readability of chart text and symbols;
• RNCs incorporate very similar colour palettes to the day/night colours used by ENCs.
It is mandatory for RCDS to have the capability to use different colour palettes;
• RNCs are treated as individual charts (not seamless like ENCs). However, it is possible
for ECDIS to automatically load adjoining chart based on the meta data provided;
• ARPA radar targets can be overlaid onto an RNC. It is also possible for a radar video
image to be scaled to fit the RNC. Scaling the RNC to fit the radar video image is
RNCs maintain the horizontal datum of the paper chart from which the RNC has been
derived. Mariners should understand, how the chart horizontal datum relates to the
datum of the position fixing system. In some instances, this may appear as a shift in
position. (Any differences will be most noticeable at grid intersections and during route
monitoring). Where the difference between the local horizontal datum and WGS 84 is
known, an adjustment should be automatically applied by the ECDIS.
RNCDisplay, NIGHT
RNC updating
• Updates can be supplied as complete refreshed images or as patches (tiles or areas)
that the RCDS can superimpose on the original RNC. The latter method is normally
used as this minimises the amount of data to be provided;
• Updates are provided in line with those made available for the equivalent paper chart;
and
• Most RNC services currently rely on CD as the transfer media.
IMO has issued SN Circ.207 illustrating the functional differences between ECDIS and
RCDS modes, see Annex IV.
In 2003 ISO issued a specific standard for private chart data; this standard was produced
on the initiative of the industry: ISO 19379 applies to both private vector charts and to
private raster charts. Chart data certified according to ISO19379, is now available on the
market.
Chart data published by private companies is entirely under the product liability of the
producing company. The responsibility and product liability for official charts rests with
the government of the producing nation.
Private chart data, regardless of the format in which it is supplied to the market does not
meet the requirements specified by the IMO Performance Standards for ECDIS.
In contrast to ENCs and RNCs there are many proprietary formats used. Consequently,
chart data from different manufacturers are incompatible with each other – and so are
the ECS which make use of them.
Navigating with ECDIS is fundamentally different from navigating with paper charts.
The table below lists a range of bridge work-processes that are affected by changing to an
ECDIS system, and which may require that procedures are amended or developed. The
table includes some points for analysis and consideration.
It is not implied that all items mentioned should result in corresponding written
procedures, nor is it implied that the list in any way is conclusive.
Procedure considerations
Voyage Planning Voyage Planning is different on an ECDIS compared to a paper chart. There are
a number of available features, such as safety contours, alarms, click-and-drop
facilities for waypoints and markers, etc. While it is still possible to make
errors in Voyage Plans (VPs) they are likely to be different in type from the
errors most frequently observed on paper charts. Consideration should be
given to developing a “best practise” for ECDIS VPs.
Issues such as which chart types are available in the ECDIS for the segments of
the voyage should be considered. The process analysis should also cover the
situations where vessels are operating ECDIS in addition to traditional paper
charts, where VPs are drawn on paper charts as well as programmed on the
ECDIS.
The VP format should be considered. The existing formats in use may not have
been drawn up with ECDIS in mind, and a VP format produced by the ECDIS may
not fulfil the needs of the company. How should an ECDIS VP be backed up
during voyage execution, in case the ECDIS must be reset or the navigation
sensors fail?
Voyage execution The voyage execution impacts on various bridge procedures, and the
consequence of the new procedures introduced with the ECDIS should be
analysed and appreciated. It concerns e.g. issues such as the changing of the
watch and the settings of the equipment.
Procedure considerations
Sharing of VPs VPs may be stored and shared between several users or ships. It is possible for
an Officer with a few keystrokes to print and present a complete and
comprehensive VP – possibly made for a vessel with different characteristics.
VPs can be sent ashore for approval or for the creation of a VP bank.
Although the sharing of VPs may be economically attractive, there may be
legal and other considerations
Both paper charts Where vessels carry an ECDIS in addition to a paper charts.
and ECDIS in use In those situations the role of the ECDIS and the charts should be considered.
If the ECDIS is used for real time navigation, the statutory requirements
regarding monitoring of the progress of the voyage and marking of positions
should be considered.
E.g.
• are positions marked in paper charts solely for record keeping purposes?
• what steps are taken to ensure that intended tracks marked on the paper
charts correspond with the ECDIS information?
• are all persons concerned with the navigation of the vessel using the same
equipment according to the bridge procedures?
Until all the world is covered by ENCs, it is most likely that most vessels to
some degree will have to operate a dual – or triple – system with paper, raster
and vector charts.
Change of watch It should be possible for the Officer taking over the watch to look through
the intended track on an ECDIS in preparation to take over the watch at the
same time as the equipment is in use for manoeuvring in confined water or in
dense traffic conditions.
Procedure considerations
Human elements The human element must also be appreciated. While young navigators will
often be quick to explore the ECDIS and learn the details, the older and more
experienced senior officers may be more reluctant users.
The degree of familiarisation training required for the various staff positions
onboard should be considered. The approval of a VP requires equivalent
knowledge of the system to that expected of the person doing the planning.
Auditing Vessels are audited by internal and external parties. How is it ensured that the
company’s internal auditors can verify that the system is set up and operated
in accordance with the corporate plans?
What training is needed for the auditors and superintendents?
Are ECDIS auditing and inspection procedures required?
Compendium on
Flag State ECDIS
requirements
Present version
25 November 2004.