CESTUI QUE VIE - He Whose Life
CESTUI QUE VIE - He Whose Life
Although you believe you are free, you are “legally” a slave, in the same way that your parents, grandparents and great-
grandparents were slaves. You may be lucky enough to live on a nice plantation with other slaves, managed by
supervising slaves such as police, judges, doctors, and politicians, where few examples of slave cruelty occur. Or you
may be seeing changes on the community plantation, which is part of a state slave plantation and a national slave
plantation where there is more crime, more misery, and more death. The fact that you are a slave is unquestionable. The
only unknown is whether you will allow your children and their children to grow up as slaves as well.
You are a slave because since 1933, upon the birth of a new child, the Executors or Administrators of the higher State
voluntarily and knowingly transmit the beneficial rights of the child as Beneficiary to the First Cestui Que Vie Trust in
the form of a Registration Number when registering the Name, thereby also creating the Corporate Person and denying
the child any rights as owner of Real Property.
You are a slave because, since 1933, when a child is born, the Executors or Administrators of the higher State knowingly
and voluntarily declare that the baby is property (movable property) for the State. The slave baby contract is then created
by honoring the ancient tradition of having either the ink imprint of the baby's feet on the live birth record or a drop of
his blood, which is how parents are tricked into handing over the signature. of the newborn child through misleading
legal meanings in the registration of live births (Civil Registry). This record of live births as a promissory note is
converted into a slave bond sold to the state bank's private reserve, and then transferred to a second and separate Cestui
Que Vie trust per child that the bank holds. Once the note reaches maturity and the bank cannot “seize” the slave son, a
maritime lien is legally issued to “save” the lost property and is monetized as serially issued currency against the Cestui
Que Vie Trust.
Each Cestui Que Vie Trust created since 1933, represents one of the 3 Crowns representing the three
property attributions of the Roman Cult: Real Property (over the Land), Personal Property (the body) and
Ecclesiastical Property (the soul). . Each corresponds exactly to the three forms of law available to the
Galla pillar of the Courts: commercial law (the judge is the 'landowner'), maritime law and canon law (the
judge is the banker or the one who sits on the bench), and Talmudic law (the judge is the priest).
Pope Paul III
One may not realize that he is a slave according to the slave laws of the Uniform Commercial Codes (UCC), but he may
still mistakenly believe that he is a slave with “more rights” as used to be granted under the “Common law” until it was
largely abolished again in 1933 without proper notice. The word “ common ” comes from 14th century Latin
communities meaning “ to trust, to commit to a burden, public duty, service or obligation .” The word was created
from the combination of two ancient pre-Vatican Latin words com/comitto = “ to trust, commit” and munis = “
burden, public service or obligation .” In other words, the real meaning of common, as first formed due to the creation
of the Roman trust over the planet, is the concept of “voluntary servitude” or simply “voluntary slavery.”
The common law is nothing more than the laws of “ voluntary servitude ” and the laws of “ voluntary slavery ” for the
Roman Cult and the Venetian slave masters. It is the slave overseers job to convince you that you are NOT a slave. The
common law still exists and has not been largely abolished and replaced with commercial law, to confuse you, to give
you false hope. In exchange, they are rewarded as loyal slaves with larger houses to use and more privileges than other
slaves.
The reason why slave overseers like judges, politicians, bankers, actors and media personalities are forced to lie and deny
that we are all slaves, is because the slave system of voluntary servitude or “common law” It was not the first global
slave system, but simply its evolution. Before the rise of the Common Law, we were all subject to being considered mere
animals or things under the Canon Law of the Roman Cult, also known as the Law of the See (or Sea or Water ) or
Admiralty Law .
Under Admiralty Law, you are either a slave to the ship of state or simply cargo for legal salvage. Thus in 1302 through
the Unam Sanctam , the Roman Cult illegally claimed through trust possession of the entire planet and all living
“things,” whether as slaves or less than slaves with things administered through the Court. of Rota. This court, declared
the Supreme Court of all Courts on the planet, was initially abolished in the 16th century, only to be reestablished in
1908 under Pope Pius to the twelve apostles. Since then, this new purely spiritual court has been kept in constant
“session,” and the local courts use these powers to administer Immortal Divine Spirits expressed in Trust within the
Vessels of Flesh as mere dead things.
However, this is not the only form of slave law that is still in force today but the oldest, most evil and based on false
history are the slave laws of the Menasheh, also known as the Rabbi through the unholy document of hate first formed in
333 known as the Talmud of the Menasheh, the false Israelites. Through the Talmud of the false Israelites, the entire
planet is enslaved with the servants of the “chosen people” known as Canaanites or K-nights (Knight = Knights), also
known as the Scythians (Eurasian nomads), and the rest as the goy/gyu and goyim, that is, the cattle, the lifeless dead
corpses.
brought before a court of law ; a legal process ; an accusation filed or a complaint or cause filed in court . This
meaning is then used to devastating effect through Pius the planet. So when a man or woman receives a blue or yellow
notice from a court issued through this unholy knowledge of canon law, when they get to court they are automatically
one thing. When a man or woman tries to defend themselves by seeking to speak before the judge, they automatically
“consent” to being a thing. Thus, a judge with knowledge of such tricks can silence any man or woman by “legally”
threatening the court with contempt if the “thing” does not stop making noise.
In fact, it is the Canon Law of the Roman Cult of 1983 that establishes that all courts are oratories, with judges who have
ecclesiastical powers as “ordinaries” and their chambers as “chapels.” Thus, bar associations around the world have
helped judges learn about their new powers to counter those men and women who continue to awaken to their slave
status, but demonstrating how to remain “in honor” with that perverse law and ensure that such “terrorists” be sent to
prison for long sentences as a warning to others.
If a judge is so inclined to ensure that an educated defendant is legally sent to prison or worse, he or she can escape for
the third and final time to his or her chambers and invoke his or her most powerful position as rabbi of a Talmud Court
under the Laws. Talmudic of the false Israelites of the house of the twelve tribes of Menasheh. Now, even a judge from a
nation that is against the death penalty can choose to impose a “legal” sentence against any goy/gyu or goyim who dares
to harm an Israelite, which is usually death. However, while judges in the United States and other nations have begun
training in the reimposition of Talmudic Law, it is in the hands of the false Menasheh aka elite anti-Semitic parasites aka
the Black Khazars and families Venetian nobles.
Ultimately, it is enough for the judges, clerks and members of the Bar to know that they have our property in their Cestui
Que Vie Trusts and that we are completely without effective rights, until we challenge their fraud.
However, even when you challenge their fraud many deny and outright lie on the record. Yes, the judges absolutely
commit perjury on the record to deny that they have powers of trustee and executor, the case being an inferred trust and
an executor of the Cestui Que Vie Trust, from which powers are being removed for the court/tribunal form .
So how can a man or woman defend themselves against a private, secret society that has hijacked the law, that refuses to
tell the truth, that lies in its own members and refuses to provide a just remedy? We will tell you this in detail in the next
El Indagador article, but now let's continue with the story, as it is the basis for understanding everything we did not know
until now about this infamous system and how we came to be imprisoned in it.
This sculpture, which at first glance is a “bull”, is located on Wall Street. But in reality they are telling us something else.
Well, but what does that have to do with this topic? The word
“ BULL ” (bull in English), also means “ BULA ” (pontifical document with ordinances, condemnations or decrees), and
that is precisely what they tell us that WallStreet is about, but if the real meaning of the words is unknown, it is like if
they did not exist for those who ignore it, although that does not mean that it DOES NOT EXIST nor is it in application
or affecting all SLAVES who are also unaware of being slaves.
ANUI
WDAIAINIIII
PAPAL BULLS
In the year 1302 Pope Boniface issued his infamous Papal Bull Unam Sanctam , the first Express Trust.
He claimed control over the entire planet, making him “King of the World.” In celebration, he commissioned a hat in
the shape of a pine cone with an elaborate crown at its base, which later became the Triple Tiara, the TRIREGNUM (or
Three Kingdoms) CROWN, the true meaning of which we will describe below. .
The pine cone is an ancient symbol of fertility and one traditionally associated with Ba'al as well as the Cult of Cybele.
It also represents the pineal gland in the center of our brain - crystalline in nature - which allows us access to The
Creative Source, hence the 4 meter pine cone symbols in the Vatican.
THE FIRST CROWN IS THE CROWN
FROM THE EARTH
Pope Boniface VIII was the first leader in history to create the concept of a Trust, but the first Testamentary Trust
through a title and will, creating a DECEASED STATE, was created by Pope Nicholas V in 1455 through the Papal Bull
Romanus Pontifex .
This is one of three papal bulls that include the line with the opening words “For perpetual remembrance.” This Bull had
the effect of transferring the right to use the land as Real Property, from the Unam Sanctam Express Trust, to the control
of the Pontiff and his successors in perpetuity.
Consequently, all land is claimed as “crown land.” This first Crown is represented by the first Cestui Que Vie created
when a child is born. It deprives him of all title to benefits and rights over the land.
Spain lost the crown in 1604 when it was awarded to King James I of England by Pope Paul V, after a successful voyage
of the “Union of Crowns” or Common Wealth in 1605 after the false flag operation of the “Conspiracy”. "Gunpowder
Plot" (Plot of 1605, also known as the "Jesuit Betrayal", which was a failed assassination attempt against King James I of
England and VI of Scotland by a group of English provincial Catholics led by Robert Catesby) .
The Crown was finally lost to England in 1975 when it was returned by Spain and King Charles I, where it remains to
this day.
This second Crown is represented by the second Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born, by the sale of the
Birth Certificate as a BOND to the nation's private central bank, depriving us of possession of our physical body and
condemning us to death. PERPETUAL SLAVERY as a Roman person or slave.
** ECCLESIASTIC = derived from ECLESSIA = political assembly of citizens of the ancient states of
Greece, especially the periodic meeting of Athenian citizens to conduct public business and to consider
matters proposed by the council†
The Crown was lost in 1816 due to the deliberate bankruptcy of England, and awarded to the “Temple Bar” which
became known as the “Crown Bar” or simply the Crown.
judge's bench from the rest of the courtroom; The other closed both benches and the area for lawyers
involved in trials from the space assigned for the plaintiff, witnesses and others. Such persons appearing as
speakers (attorneys or counselors) before the court/tribunal were said to be “called to the bar”, this is –
apparently – a privilege, to speak and otherwise serve in the presence of the judges as “ barristas” or
“barristeros”, another English term for “attorneys” (“Advisers admitted to plead at the bar”)**
BAR Associations (“British Accredited Registry” or “Registry of British Accredited (Lawyers)”) have since been
responsible for administering the “harvest” of the souls of the lost and cursed, including the registration and collection of
Baptismal certificates representing the souls harvested by the Vatican, and stored in its vaults.
The third Crown is represented by the Third Cestui Que Vie Trust created when a child is baptized. It is the granting by
the parents of the Baptism certificate - a title for the soul - to the church or Registry.
Therefore, without legal title to one's soul we will be denied legal standing and treated as things, soulless cargoes, upon
which the BAR is now legally able to enforce Maritime Law.
† BAR = A particular portion of the courtroom/tribunal. Named after the space enclosed by two bars or
rails: one of which separated the
THE CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST
A Cestui Que Vie Trust is a fictitious concept. It is a Temporary Testamentary Trust (or Bond), first created during the
reign of Henry VIII of England through the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540 and updated by Charles II through the
Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666, in which a State could be affected for the Benefit of a Person presumed lost or abandoned
at “sea” and, therefore, assumed “dead” after seven years.
Additional presumptions by which a Trust could be formed were added in later statutes to include: bankruptcies,
secondaries, incapacitated, mortgages and private companies.
The original purpose of a Cestui Que Vie Trust was to form a temporary State for the benefit of another due to some
event, state of affairs or condition that prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent and present,
before a competent authority.
Consequently, any claim, history, statutes or arguments that deviate in terms of the origin and function of a Cestui Que
Vie Trust, as pronounced by those canons, are false and automatically null and void.
A beneficiary under the State could be either a Beneficiary or a Cestui Que Vie Trust. When a Beneficiary loses the
direct benefit of any Senior State Property deposited in a Cestui Que Vie Trust in his name, he does not “own” the
Cestui Que Vie Trust, but rather he is solely the beneficiary of what those Cestui Trust Trustees Que Vie choose to
stipulate.
As all Cestui Que Vie Trusts are created upon a presumption, based on the original purpose and function, such a Trust
cannot be created if it can be proven that those presumptions do not exist.
Since 1933, when a child is born in a State under lower Roman law, three Cestui Que Vie Trusts are created under
certain presumptions specifically designed to deny, forever, any Real Property rights to the child, any Right to be free,
and any Right to be known as man or woman, but rather a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing your Soul or
Spirit.
2. They claim the baby as property (movable property) for the State.
The slave baby contract is then created by honoring the ancient tradition of either placing the imprint of one's feet on the
live birth record or a drop of one's blood, as well as by tricking the parents into signing by handing over the baby
through misleading legal meanings about the live birth record, which is a promissory note converted into a SLAVE
BOND , sold to the state's private banking reserve and then transferred to a second and separate Cestui Que Vie Trust,
per child, owned by The bench.
When the promissory notes reach maturity and the bank is unable to “seize” the slave child, a maritime lien is legally
issued to “rescue” the lost property and is monetized as serial money issued against the Cestui Que Vie Trust.
3. They claim the soul of the child through the Baptism Certificate.
Since 1540 and the creation of the first Cestui Que Vie Trust Act, deriving its power from the Papal Bull of the leader
of the Roman Cult, Pope Paul III, when a child is baptized and a Baptism Certificate is issued, parents have gifted,
bestowed and transferred the baby's soul to a “THIRD” Cestui Que Vie Trust owned by the Roman Cult, which has
maintained its valuable property in its vaults ever since.
Since 1815, this third Crown of Roman Cult and third Cestui Que Vie Trust representing Ecclesiastical Property, has
been managed by the BARRA as the reconstituted “Galla” responsible for reaping souls as Grim Reapers.
Each Cestui Que Vie Trust since 1933 represents one of the three Crowns, representing the three property claims of the
Roman Cult:
1. Real Property (land possessions of the slave)
2. Personal Property (the slave's body)
3. Ecclesiastical Property (the soul of the slave)
Each corresponds exactly to the three forms of law available to the Galla of the Courts/Tribunals of the BARRA:
1. The commercial company law (where the judge is the “landowner”)
2. The canon of maritime law (where the judge is the banker) and
3. Talmudic law (where the judge is the priest).
Given what has been revealed about the foundations of Roman Law, what is the true hidden power of a judge when
facing a court? Is it your superior knowledge of process and procedure or magic? Or is it something simpler and far
more obvious?
Unfortunately, there is so much enthusiasm about Estates and Executors that they have deliberately not revealed that an
Estate, by definition, has to belong to a Trust, to be specific, a Testamentary Trust or Cestui Que Vie Trust.
When we receive a legal document or have to appear in court, it is these same Cestui Que Vie Trusts that have our
rights converted to the property contained within them.
Instead of being the Trustee or the Executor or the Administrator, we are merely the Beneficiary of each Cestui Que Vie
Trust, granted only the beneficial and equal use of certain property, never legal title.
So if the Roman Legal System assumes that we are merely the beneficiary of those Cestui Que Vie Trusts, when we go
to court who represents the Trustee and Executor's Office?
We all know that all cases are based on the discretion of the judge who often defies procedures, statutes and maxims of
the law.
The judge is the real and legal Name. The judge is the trust itself. We are the mirror image for them, the ghost, the dead.
It is high sorcery, truculence and subterfuge that has remained “legal” by far too long.
Under King Henry VIII and his Venetian/Magyar (Hungarian) councillors, the first poor laws were enacted around 1535
coinciding with the first official mandate requiring uniform record keeping throughout the Church of England parish of
births, deaths and marriages. .
The poor were considered the responsibility of the “Church” including ensuring that they had plenty of work and did not
starve, while they were considered by default the property of the church.
Queen Elizabeth I of England
Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, a set of measures were introduced which had the effect of accelerating the
alienation of land from peasants to landless beggars.
Under the Erection of the Barracks Act of 1588, peasants required permission from the parish to erect houses wherever
that construction was, for part of a peasant's land on his master's land, the land was considered a "right." As a result, the
hierarchies of the landless poor or “beggars” increased.
Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, the laws concerning the administration and care of the “poor” were refined through
the Poor Law (1601) which introduced a basic set of “rights” for the poor as well as the introduction of two “Overseers
of the Poor” (Guardian) in each Parish, elected at Easter and financed through the first levy (tax) through local rates
(now called “municipal taxes”) on property held by payers rates.
Charles II of England
Under Charles II of England, the concept of “settlements” as poor laborer plantations controlled by the Church of
England was later refined through the Settlements Act (1662) and the Poor Relief Act (1662), including for the first time
the issuance of “Settlement Certificates” equivalent to a “birth certificate, passport and social security certificate” listed
in the document.
A child's place of birth was his or her place of settlement, unless his or her mother had a certificate of settlement from
some other parish stating that the unborn child was included in the certificate.
However, from the age of 7 onwards the child could have been an apprentice and earned settlement for himself through
the so-called deed of apprenticeship contract or “voluntary slavery”. Also, the child could have obtained a settlement for
himself through service around the age of 16.
Under the “reforms” of the Settlement Act (1662) and the Poor Relief Act (1662), no one was allowed to move from city
to city without the appropriate “Settlement Certificate.”
If a person entered a parish in which he or she had no official settlement and it seemed likely that the new parish would
be charged, then an inspection would be made by the judges (or parish overseers).
From this inspection under oath, the judges would determine whether that person had the means to support himself. The
results of the inspection were documented in an Inspection Document.
As a result of the inspection the trespasser would be allowed to stay or be removed by means of what became known as
an Order of Removal, the origin of the modern equivalent of a “Notice of Eviction and Removal” when a sheriff
removes people from his home.
According to the various settlement acts from the 17th century onwards until the introduction of Birth Certificates, the
issuance of a Settlement Certificate was considered a privilege, not a right.
If a peasant wished to move, the parish in which he lived would choose to issue a Certificate of Settlement which then
effectively became indemnity insurance for the new parish, if the beggar was unable to earn a living.
A settlement certificate was only valid if it was perforated with the seals of the overseers of both parishes and that of the
local judges, and was not transferable. This is the same model of the modern passports used today for citizens listed as
“P” (Peons or Poor or Indigent).
Due to the increase in the number of “poor people”, in 1723 a new law called the Poor Workhouse Trial Act (1723) was
passed in which those who wished to claim benefits and relief as a pauper now had to enter a “poor workhouse.” for the
poor”, being essentially a prison for men, women and children to perform some established work.
To ensure that all poor people were considered and could be identified, new laws were also introduced to force the Poor
to wear a letter “P” on their right shoulder as a mark of their status.
This is the origin of both the “P” still located as a mark on modern passports and other “official” documents, and the “P”
worn by 20th century prisoners.
Beginning in 1773 with the Enclosure Act of 1773, followed by the Enclosure Consolidation Act of 1801, the English
Parliament effectively “privatised” massive amounts of common land for the benefit of a few, causing huge numbers of
landed peasants to arrive. to be “landless poor” and, therefore, in need of assistance from the parish. The Fencing Acts
are the basis of Land Title as it is known today.
Due to the deliberate “legal” theft of land under Parliamentary Enclosure laws of the late 18th and early 19th centuries,
the number of poor increased dramatically.
This led to the most horrible and cruel laws being introduced to provide an elite few with the slave labor necessary for
the industrial revolution through the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834), which effectively established that Poor people
could not receive any benefits unless they were constantly “employed” in a poorhouse-prison.
Consequently, despite international treaties against slavery, a worse slavery was born, being “slavery for remuneration”
or “legal slavery” through which men, women and children lived in terrible conditions and were worked “until death.” .
Beginning in 1834, a number of historical changes were introduced to the record of
births, deaths and marriages, the issuance of documents and the administration of
“poor”:
1) In 1834 the British Parliament introduced the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) , which reorganized the
parishes of the Church of England into unions that would be responsible for the poor in their area and administered by a
Board of Guardians of the Church. Poor Law, also known as the Board of Guardians. The clerks of the Magistrates'
Courts still maintained the power of a Secretary of the Board of Guardians; and
2) In 1835, the Municipal Corporations Act (1835) was introduced , which effectively standardized the corporate
model for towns and municipalities, including making the municipality responsible with elected officials for data
collection and administration service.
3) In 1836 the Births and Deaths Registration Act was introduced, which for the first time created the General
Registration Office and required uniform registrations of births, deaths and marriages throughout the Empire,
by Municipal Councils and Parish Unions. . In this way, on July 1, 1837, the Birth Certificate was formed as the
successor to the Settlement Certificate for all the “poor” stripped of their land by right of birth, for being considered
legal slaves “voluntarily.” with
4) benefits provided by the parish/region, funded by the Society of Lloyds (financial services group providing banking
and financial services in the UK and overseas) as it is to this day.
LLOYDS
BANKING
GROUP
Beginning in 1871, historic changes were encouraged in the administration of “vital statistics” such as birth certificates
and death certificates, with the introduction of health districts or “sanitary districts.”
The Local Government Act of 1871, the Public Health Act of 1872 and the Public Health Act of 1875, created a system
of “districts” – called “Health Districts” – governed by a Health Authority responsible for various public health
matters. , including mental health, legally known as “healthcare.” Two types of Health Districts were created, these
being Urban and Rural.
While health districts were “abolished” in 1894 with the Local Government Act 1894, administration of the “poor” is
still maintained in part under the concept of health district boards of Guardians, including magistrates and other “Judges
of Health”. Peace".
Since 1990, under the United Nations (UN) and World Health Organization (WHO) Convention on the Rights of the
Child, the system of issuing birth certificates as proof of a man or woman being a permanent member of the marginal
class, has become an international system.
THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE
AS PROOF THAT ONE WAS BORN ON
THE EARTH:
Baby's Footprint
J /Pioht5eot
Iruw 90ak
Birth Certificate
his ae.ztifiE.1 tiiat ozs.
WILS born in'
on___________________________A.D„ 19 O'clock
A< IVUnea ^Wl'i
fthis certificate has been signed by the
attending Physician and the duly authorized officer hereof, who has
caused the Official Seal to be hereunto affixed.
Medical Superintendent
Mother's Thumbprints
A fundamental flaw that remains within the Settlement (Birth) Certificate System for the Roman Cult and its agents, is
that the fact remains that a Settlement Certificate is proof that a man or woman must have been born on earth for it to be
certified. take effect, despite subsequent convoluted assumptions about what a certificate actually represents.
If a man or woman was not born on earth somewhere, a certificate could not be issued. Therefore, any rejection or return
of a Birth Certificate serves as perfected evidence that a man or woman was born on earth and sponsors any Affidavit of
Truth concerning their immutable rights from the Divine Creator.
This built-in “flaw” is nullified through the treatment of men and women as land themselves, through deliberate
corruption of the definition of land that includes everything that has been naturally born or self-improved on the earth.
In other words, the sharp-edged reason why the system ultimately denies each citizen their share in the common wealth
is because they are considered “chattel” and mere creatures less than slaves.
Birth Certificates are not “extremely valuable” to the holder, in whose name the certificate is issued.
While it is true that Birth Certificates are considered valuable securities that are traded among private international
entities and the elite, the holder in whose name the certificate is issued does not have access to such value.
Instead, by possession of the Birth Certificate, the man or woman essentially consents to be treated as a pauper, peon, or
pauper, and the only obligation of the elite is to provide mere scraps so that the man or woman does not die of hunger or
great illness.
While Settlement Certificates and subsequent Birth Certificates are uniquely and intentionally designed to deprive men
and women of their rightful inheritance through voluntary slavery and admission of being “poor,” the Birth Certificate
system is entirely without legitimacy, a global system of fraud and organized crime and without legal effect.-