Scribd
Upload
41 views

Rubric For A Speaking Project With Visual Aid

The rubric outlines criteria for evaluating a speaking project with a visual aid. It evaluates areas such as originality, structure, language usage, pronunciation, delivery, use of a visual aid, and time. For each criterion, descriptors are provided for excellent, above average, satisfactory, and below average performance.

Uploaded by

Jesús Fernando Luis de Luna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
41 views

Rubric For A Speaking Project With Visual Aid

The rubric outlines criteria for evaluating a speaking project with a visual aid. It evaluates areas such as originality, structure, language usage, pronunciation, delivery, use of a visual aid, and time. For each criterion, descriptors are provided for excellent, above average, satisfactory, and below average performance.

Uploaded by

Jesús Fernando Luis de Luna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Teacher Jesús Fernando Luis de Luna

Rubric for a Speaking Project with Visual Aid

4 3 2 1
CATEGORY
Excellent Above Average Satisfactory Below Average
The presenter kept the The presenter was The presenter was un-
The presenter sustained
attention of the audience somewhat enthusiastic enthusiastic; the
the interest of the
the whole time and the and kept the audience's audience's attention
audience in clever and
Originality purpose of the attention for the most showed disinterest and
innovative ways and
presentation was of the part. The purpose of the the purpose for the
achieved the purpose of
presentation was presentation was mainly presentation was not
the presentation.
achieved. achieved. achieved.
Presenter gave a clear
Presenter gave a clear Presenter did not give a
The introduction and introduction of the topic,
and concise introduction clear and concise
actual presentation were but the presentation was
of the topic. The flow of introduction of the topic.
Structure exceptionally well- somewhat unclear. For
the presentation was The flow of the
organized and easy to the most part it was
clear and concise and presentation was unclear
understand. somewhat confusing to
easy to follow. and confusing to follow.
follow.
Presenter used correct Presenter used correct
Presenter used the BEST Presenter used incorrect
sentence structure that sentence structure that
Language sentence structure/syntax sentence structure that
was appropriate is was mostly appropriate
Usage that supported the topic. was not appropriate for
supporting the topic. for the topic.
(grammar the topic.
and syntax) Slang/reductions were Slang were very often
No slang/reductions A few (1-5) slangs were (6+) used.
NEVER used.
were used. used.

Speaks clearly and


Speaks clearly and Speaks clearly and
distinctly most (94-85%) Frequently mumbles OR
distinctly all (100- distinctly all (100-95%)
Pronunciation of the time. mispronounces several
95%) the time and the time but
+ Enunciation Mispronounces 2-5 (6+) key words in the
mispronounces no mispronounces one
words in the presentation.
words. word.
presentation.
Presenter was somewhat
prepared. Delivery of the
The presenter is VERY
Presenter was well presentation was made Presenter was clearly
WELL prepared and
prepared and delivered but with strong unprepared to present to
delivers ideas in a clear
ideas with lots of eye dependence on notes and the audience. Marked
and concise manner,
contact. Appropriate hesitation. Some eye lack of eye contact, poor
Delivery without depending too
voice volume, tone, and contact and good voice voice volume, tone, and
much on notes. Volume,
pacing. Gestures volume, tone, and pacing. Inappropriate
pacing, and gestures
supported the overall pacing. Some gestures which detracted
contribute maximally to
presentation. appropriate gestures that from the presentation.
the presentation.
supported the
presentation.
2 Points: 0 Points:
Uses the rule Doesn’t use the rule:
70-30 70-30
Visual Aid
2 Points: 0 Points:
Uses the rule Doesn’t use the rule:
NO READING NO READING

The presentation lasts


The presentation lasts 5 The presentation lasts from The presentation lasts less
Time from 2.00 to 2.59
minutes or more 3.00 to 4.59 minutes than 2 minutes
minutes

You might also like