Sop 603 Capa
Sop 603 Capa
PURPOSE: The purpose of this SOP is to establish a Corrective and Preventative Action
(CAPA) Plan for conducting and documenting internal activities for continual assessment of
compliance with clinical trials conducted at KSU.
SCOPE: This SOP applies to the PI and designated clinical research personnel involved in the
regulatory implementation and coordination of clinical trials at KSU.
RESPONSIBILITY: The PI is responsible for the overall conduct of a research study at KSU,
however; delegation allows clinical research team members to perform CAPA activities under
the direct supervision of the PI in the implementation and conduct of clinical trials.
DEFINITIONS:
Audit: A systematic and independent examination of trial related activities and documents to
determine whether the evaluated trial related activities were conducted, and the data were
recorded, analyzed and accurately reported according to the protocol, sponsor’s standard
operating procedures (SOPs), Good Clinical Practice (GCP), and the applicable regulatory
requirement(s).
Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA): The processes taken and process improvements
initiated to eliminate causes of nonconformities or other undesirable situations.
Monitoring: The act of overseeing the progress of a clinical trial, and of ensuring that it is
conducted, recorded, and reported in accordance with the protocol, Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs), Good Clinical Practice (GCP), and the applicable regulatory
requirement(s).
Monitoring Report: A written report from the monitor to the sponsor after each site visit and/or
other trial-related communication according to the sponsor’s SOPs
Root Cause Analysis: A class of problem solving methods used to identify the root causes of
problems or events.
Standard Operating Procedures for Clinical Research at Kent State University
PROCEDURE:
1. Research personnel will be aware that a Corrective and Preventative Action (CAPA)
Plan can be triggered in a number of ways that may include:
During a Site Initiation Visit (SIV) or Routine Monitoring Visit (RMV) when a
monitor reports that a site requires a “for cause” or “not for cause” audit.
During an internal audit
During an FDA audit
Preventative actions for potential problems and issues
2. To minimize the need for a CAPA, research personnel will maintain ongoing training
requirements necessary to work in research and comply with the Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs) of KSU.
3. Research personnel will recognize that a CAPA plan can include more than one activity
and issue whereas, a Note to File (NTF) usually addresses one problem or issue that
has occurred.
4. Research personnel will adhere to the following principles when developing and
executing a CAPA plan:
4.1. The plan should make sense.
4.2. The plan should be easily implemented and managed.
4.3. The plan must be systematic and measurable. It must be proactive and able to
correct problems at all levels of the research site. It should be easy to use and
track progress of the action to be able to show results that are working.
4.4. The plan should account for more than a reaction to problems. It should have the
potential to improve efficiency and effectiveness of the clinical trial.
5. Research personnel will complete a CAPA Plan Response Form (Appendix JJ) that
includes the following when preparing a CAPA plan:
5.1. Identify: Pinpoint the problem or potential problem.
5.2. Evaluate: Assess the magnitude and impact of the problem.
5.3. Investigate: Research the problem.
5.4. Analyze: Perform a root cause analysis of the problem.
5.5. Act: Create a list of required actions and due dates to eliminate the problem and
prevent recurrence.
5.6. Implement: Execute the action plan and track action item, responsibilities and
completion status
Standard Operating Procedures for Clinical Research at Kent State University
5.7. Follow-up: Verify and assess the effectiveness of the plan. Make changes to the
plan if needed.
APPENDICES: