STS Midterm Reviewer
STS Midterm Reviewer
HUMAN FLOURISHING IN PROGRESS AND DE- machines to produce foods and etc.
DEVELOPMENT
The two definitions of technology are
interconnected with each other in such a way that the
outcomes of human activities are meant to serve their
3.1 HUMAN FLOURISHING
purpose. However, this definition of technology became
The concept of technology was controversial in problematic when technology does not serve its
the field of philosophy. Martin Heidegger, a German purpose (essence). For example, imagine that COVID-19
philosopher, problematized how a human person relates will die naturally. You might think that those PPEs and
to technology. He investigated the meaning of gadgets for learning are meaningless because the
technology in ancient and modern times. Moving on, purpose is not being served. The revival of face-to-face
you will also learn the essence of technology, learning will make a gadget for online learning less
technology as a way of revealing. significant in the traditional classroom.
- A German philosopher who is fun of thinking The Greek definition of technology as a human
about 'being', technology and etc. activity designed for a specific purpose was restructured
- Rejected the idea of positivist thinkers and in modern times. Technology in the modern era was
critical to technological domination in the reduced to calculative thinking that controls nature. For
modern world instance, the invention of the telescope, the steam
- Was critical to the essence and modern machine, and other devices were used to master nature.
technology In the mastery of nature, we used technology to
- Reconstructed the meaning of technology that manipulate things around us. To see a clear picture,
reflected in his essay entitled " The Question Heidegger provided three revelations on modern
Concerning Technology" technology as challenging forth, enframing and
dangerous.
According to Martin Heidegger, modern technology The term 'good life is one of the concerns of
is enframing. The term 'enframing' derives from the Greek thinkers like Aristotle. In the Nichomachean
word 'frame' which means putting something into a box. Ethics, Aristotle says that every action aims at some
This metaphorical term of Heidegger connotes that good. Some goods are classified as instrumental or
modern technology put nature into a box through intrinsic. The instrumental good is a means to achieve
scientific knowledge. Enframing, according to Heidegger, something else while intrinsic good is good in itself or
is akin to two ways of looking at the world; calculative ultimate good (Eudaimonia or human
thinking and meditative thinking. Humans put an order flourishing/happiness). At this point, Aristotle is
to nature and control it through calculative thinking. suggesting that if we want to live a good life then we
must develop intellectual and moral virtues.
A brief overview of Aristotle's Life The soul was divided into three; rational,
sensitive, and nutritive. The rational part of the soul is
Aristotle, who lived from 384 - 322 BC, is the ability of a human person to think either based on
probably the most important ancient Greek philosopher theoretical or practical knowledge. Aristotle formulated
and scientist. He was a student of Plato and founded a the principle of 'man as a rational animal' to achieve
school named Lyceum. In his own school, Aristotle's eudaimonia/happiness.
students compiled their lecture notes and came up with
a book entitled Nichomachean Ethics. This Achieving eudaimonia/happiness is possible
Nichomachean Ethics, dedicated to his son only when a human person learns to identify and
Nichomachus, became a foundation of Aristotle's ethics choose the mean of their action between excess and
composed of ten books. deficiency. By doing this, we can moderate our actions
to achieve the ultimate good or virtuous action. For The good life as a final end of human actions is an
example, integrating advanced technology into human indispensable ethical theory that advocates happiness
activities aided workers to produce outputs faster and along with the development of science and technology.
easier. Almost everything is run by machines. But, too Connecting good life, science and technology requires
much dependent on machines has negative effects on us to set our goal which is to achieve eudaimonia.
human well-being. However, those societies that never Achieving eudaimonia is possible through the constant
upgrade their technology were left behind in the fast- practice of moral virtues guided by the rational part of
changing industrial revolution and considered backward the soul.
societies. Between the two extremes of actions, a
rational animal who aims to reach eudaimonia should
choose the mean of action of the advanced technocratic 3.3 HUMAN FLOURISHING THROUGH PROGRESS AND
society and backward society. Aristotle's method can be DE-DEVELOPMENT
applied to the action of generosity, courage, anger and
etc. to make them virtuous. Despite the efforts to close out the gap between the rich
and poor countries, the gap just keeps on widening.
(BBC Headline report in 2015)
Arete Although there is no standard measure of
inequality, the report claimed that most indicators
Arete is one of the significant concepts of Aristotle
suggest that the widening of the growth gap slowed
in achieving a good life/Eudaimonia or happiness. Arete
during the financial crisis in 2007 but is now growing
is a Greek term that means 'excellence of any kind in
again. The increasing inequality appears paradoxical
terms of intellectual and moral virtues. Intellectual
having in mind the efforts that had been poured onto
virtue is achieved through education and experience. On
the development programs designed to assist poor
the other hand, moral virtue is developed through the
countries to rise from absence to slow progress.
constant practice of an action that promotes good life.
For instance, courage became a virtue when it is With this backdrop and in the context of
properly displayed at the right time, right manner, and unprecedented scientific and technological
right place in the face of danger. A person who does not advancement and economic development, a human
properly assess the danger and reserve any fear may must ask themselves whether they are indeed
develop the vice of foolhardiness or rashness. However, flourishing, individually or collectively. If development
a person may develop the vice of cowardice if he/she efforts to close out the gap between the rich and the
becomes fearful and incapable of acting on the problem poor countries have failed, is it possible to confront the
in the face of danger. challenges of development through a nonconformist
framework?