PRELIM-SpecPro Reviewer (AutoRecovered)
PRELIM-SpecPro Reviewer (AutoRecovered)
Special proceeding is a remedy which a party seeks to establish a status, a right, or a particular fact (S1 R1)
and refer to legal processes that are used to address specific legal matters that are not covered by ordinary
court proceedings. These proceedings are often used to settle disputes that are outside the scope of
ordinary litigation.
Exception: May become adversarial when there are oppositors to the petition [De Leon & Wilwayco, Special
Proceedings: Essentials for Bench and Bar (2015)]
A special proceeding has one definite party, who petitions or applies for a declaration of a status, right, or
particular fact, but no definite adverse party. [Montañer v. Shari’a District Court, G.R. No. 174975 (2009)]
An action is a formal demand of one’s right in a court of justice in the manner prescribed by the court or by
the law. It is the method of applying legal remedies according to definite established rules. The term “special
proceedings” may be defined as an application or proceeding to establish the status or right of a party, or a
particular fact. Usually, in special proceedings, no formal pleadings are required unless the statute expressly
so provides. In special proceedings, the remedy is granted generally upon application or motion [Natcher v.
CA, G.R. No. 133000 (2001)]
a. A civil action is one by which a party sues another for the enforcement or protection of a right, or
the prevention or redress of a wrong. A civil action may either be ordinary or special.
- Governed by Rules 1-71
- Based on cause of action
- Proceeding is adversarial since it involves two (2) contending parties
-
b. A criminal action is one by which the State prosecutes a person for an act or omission punishable by
law.
c. A special proceeding is a remedy by which a party seeks to establish a status, a right, or a particular
fact.[Sec. 3(a), 3(b), Rule 1]
- Governed by Rules 72-109 of the ROC, and rules on ordinary civil actions only applies whenever
practicable.
- It is based on a particular fact, status, or right sought to be established
- GN: Non adversarial, except when ther is an oppositor/respondent.
- Party in Spec Pro is the petitioner, except when opposed, the oppositor or respondent.
OUTSIDE MM: MTC if gross value of the estate does not exceed P300,000 – if exceeds, then RTC
INSIDE MM: MTC if gross value of the estate does not exceed P400,000 - otherwise, RTC
- Considering that Rules on SP is part of the ROC, it shall be liberally construed in order to promote
their objective of securing a just speedy, and inexpensive disposition of every action and
proceeding.
Rules of procedure are tools designed to facilitate the attainment of justice, and courts must avoid
their strict and rigid application which would result in technicalities that tend to frustrate rather
than promote substantial justice. (Anama vs. PSB)
Settlement of the Estate is the process of administration by the executor or administrator carried so far
that all debts and legacies has been paid and the individual shares of distributees in the corpus of the
estate, or the residuary portion, as the case may be, definitely ascertained and determined and accounts
filed and passed, so that nothing remains but to make final distribution. (Black’s Law Dictionary)
General Rule: is that when a person dies, his estate shall be judicially administered by a court of
competent jurisdiction.
Estate is the degree, quantity, nature, and extent of interest which a person has in real or personal
property. (Black’s Law Dictionary)
Testate proceedings take precedence over intestate proceedings of the same estate [Sandoval v.
Santiago, G.R. No. L-1723 (1949)]
Thus, if in the course of intestate proceedings pending before a court of first instance, it is found that
the decedent had left a last will and testament, proceedings for the probate of the latter should replace the
intestate proceedings even if at that stage an administrator had already been appointed, the latter
being required to render final account and turn over the estate in his possession to the executor
subsequently appointed. This, however, is understood to be without prejudice that should the alleged will
be rejected or is disapproved, the proceeding shall continue as an intestacy [Uriarte v. CFI, G.R. No. L-21938
(1970)]
Sec. 1 of Rule 73 refers to courts in the Philippines and simply means that once a special proceeding
for the settlement of the estate of a decedent is filed in one of such courts, that court has exclusive
jurisdiction over said estate and no other special proceedings involving the same subject matter may
be filed before any other court. [Republic v. Villarama, Jr., G.R. No. 117733 (1997)]
Extent of Jurisdiction of Probate Court
The probate jurisdiction relates only to matters having to do with the settlement of the estate and probate
of wills of deceased persons, and the appointment and removal of administrators, executors, guardians,
and trustees [Ramos v. CA, G.R. No. (1989)] Probate court cannot adjudicate or determine title to
properties claimed to be a part of the estate and which are claimed to belong to outside parties (Ignacio v
Reyes)
REQ: 1. Died Intestate 2. Left no debts 3. Heir are all of age, or minors are rep by their legal or judicial
representatives, and 4. All heirs agree
NOTA BENE:
Note: shall be held not less than (1) month nor more than three (3) months from the date of the last
publication of a notice which shall be published once a week for three (3) consecutive weeks in a
newspaper of general circulation in the province
REQ:
Probate is a special proceeding to establish the validity of a will. No will passes property unless it is
probated by a court.
Reprobate is a special proceeding to establish the validity of a will proved in a foreign country.
Q. Why necessary?
- No will shall be pass either real or personal estate unless it is proved and allowed in the proper court;
Note: The question of intrinsic validity of a will normally come only after the court has declared the will ha
been duly authenticated --- When? – the prob court may pass upon intrinsic validity when the will is null
and void as in the case of preterition.
Testate proceedings take precedence over intestate proceedings of the same estate [Sandoval v.
Santiago, G.R. No. L-1723 (1949)]
ALLOWANCE OF WILL
Effect of Allowance: Subject to the right of appeal, such allowance of the will shall be conclusive as
to its due execution.
*Courts are tasked to determine nothing more than the extrinsic validity of a Will in probate
proceedings.
Q. Who May Petition for Probate; Persons Entitled To Notice
The executor, devisee, or legatee named in the will, or any other person interested in the estate,
may, at any time after the death of the testator, petition the court having jurisdiction to have the
will allowed, whether the same be in his possession or not, or is lost or destroyed [Sections 1 and 2,
Rule 76; Palaganas v. Palaganas, G.R. No. 169144 (2011)]
Contents of Petition
A petition for the allowance of a will must show, so far as known to the petitioner.
(a) The jurisdictional facts;
(b) The names, ages, and residences of the heirs, legatees, and devisees of the testator or
decedent;
(c) The probable value and character of the property of the estate;
(d) The name of the person for whom letters are prayed;
(e) If the will has not been delivered to the court, the name of the person having custody of it.
GROUNDS OF DISALLOWANCE OF THE WILL
1. If not executed and attested as required by law
2. Testator – insane or mentally incapable to make a will, at the time of the execution
3. Executed under duress, or the influence of fear or threats
4. Procured by undue and improper pressure and influence, on part of the beneficiary, or of
some other person for his benefit
5. If the signature of the testator was procured by fraud or trick—did not intend that the
instrument be his will at the time of fixing his signature thereto.
Not executed/attested as required.
Insane/Mental Incapacity
Executed under duress or undue influence
Signature Procured by Fraud or Trick
Q. Executor?
- This person designed and charged by the testator in his will to carried out the provisions thereof
upon the allowance of the will, said person, unless he is unfit to discharge the trust as an
executor, takes over the administration of the estate.
Incompetent administrator or executor:
- Minor
- Not resident of the Ph
- If the court finds the named executor unfit to execute the duties by reason of drunkenness,
improvidence, want of understanding or integrity, or in convicted of an offense involving
moral turpitude.
ORDER OF PREFERENCE
OUTLINE
A.
1.Special Proceedings
3.Special Proceeding Cases (SEGTARHHCVJCDC) *Not exclusive—there are other proceedings considered as
spec pro which seeks…
2. Estate
6. Def Probate/Reprobate