The document provides a rubric for evaluating various sections of a research paper such as the title page, background research, introduction, literature review, methods, works cited, and appendices. Each section is scored on a scale from excellent to incomplete. Criteria for scoring include completeness, clarity, organization, use of citations, level of detail, and logical explanations. Sections with higher scores have more thorough and well-developed content that follows standard formats.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
42 views
Rubrics For Research Paper
The document provides a rubric for evaluating various sections of a research paper such as the title page, background research, introduction, literature review, methods, works cited, and appendices. Each section is scored on a scale from excellent to incomplete. Criteria for scoring include completeness, clarity, organization, use of citations, level of detail, and logical explanations. Sections with higher scores have more thorough and well-developed content that follows standard formats.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
Title Page & Preliminaries (20%) SCORE
Clear, concise, appropriate description of research
29 15 10 5 Excellent Good Poor Incomplete Title part includes Title page is missing Title page is missing Title page is missing student's names, Title one of the following: two of the following: several components is centered mid-page, names, Title is student's names, Title and is difficult to inverted triangle and centered mid-page, is centered mid-page, understand. concisely addresses and in inverted and in inverted project topic. triangle. Title triangle. Title addresses project somewhat addresses topic. project topic. Background Research (30%) Detailed of background research on the topic with a minimum of ten sources. This should point toward the relevance of your project - why is the project important to your group, school, and community? 30 25 20 10 Excellent Good Poor Incomplete Student introduces Student introduces Student introduces Student is missing two specific, testable topic specific, testable specific, testable topic or more of the question, provides topic question, question, but provides following: topic background provides background little background question, background information on STEM information on some information on STEM information, why concepts related to the STEM concepts, concepts related to student is interested in question, and explains explains why the question. Does the topic. why student is student is interested not explain why interested in the topic. in the topic. student is interested in the topic. Introduction (30%) Briefly describe the goal and purpose of the project. Clearly state the relevance of your project, and state your HYPOTHESIS (for all scientific studies) 30 25 20 10 Excellent Good Poor Incomplete The student clearly Student makes The student makes The student does not links background connections between connections between make connections research, the goal of background background research, between background the project, and research, goal, and goal, and relevance of research, goal, and relevance. relevance of project, project, but one or relevance. HYPOTHESIS/GOAL is but one or more of more of these HYPOTHESIS/GOAL is clearly stated. these connections connections are not not present. are moderately clear. clear. HYPOTHESIS/GOAL HYPOTHESIS/GOAL is clearly stated. is not clearly stated. Literature Review (30%) Documents the state of the art with respect to the subject or topic you are writing about 30 25 20 10 Excellent Good Poor Incomplete Comprehensive Complete literature Partially complete and Incomplete or literature review. review with sound somewhat disorganized. Includes Includes current and organization. disorganized. Includes an inappropriate landmark literature Includes very few few non-refereed number of nonrefereed highly relevant to the nonrefereed sources sources. Establishes a sources. Fails to topic. Establishes an and provides current basic theoretical establish an advanced theoretical research relevant to framework (including appropriate theoretical framework (including the field and the motivational theories) framework (including motivational theories) topic. Establishes a for the research topic. motivational theories) for the research topic. sound and proficient Demonstrates a basic for the research topic. appropriate for theoretical understanding of Fails to site publication or framework appropriate citation appropriately. Not presentation. (including format, but requires appropriate for Information was motivational significant revision. publication or expertly synthesized theories) for the Most information is presentation. and brought to a research topic. well synthesized and Information was not coherent and logical Somewhat brought to a logical well synthesized and conclusion. appropriate for conclusion, although some conclusions were publication or some parts show not logically arrived at. presentation. signs of faltering logic. Information is well synthesized and brought to a logical conclusion. Methods (30%) Include Materials and Procedures used to conduct your research. 30 25 20 10 Excellent Good Poor Incomplete MATERIALS: MATERIALS: MATERIALS: The student did not list ALL required materials The student The student included all necessary items or are listed. included all items most items required. use appropriate PROCEDURE: required. PROCEDURE: materials. Steps are Steps are PROCEDURE: The steps are logical, not detailed or logical, ordered/numbered, Steps are numbered, but somewhat and/or missing. It logical, and thorough logical, and confusing. would be extremely enough to be repeated thorough, but one or difficult to follow or without question or more steps are duplicate this confusion. missing or experiment. confusing. Works Cited (10%) List all books, publications, and communications from which significant material was used during your research. Use Chicago Manual of Style format. Any factual information presented that is not your original work MUST have sources cited. If not, you are plagiarizing! 10 8 5 3 Excellent Good Poor Incomplete All sources are All sources are Most sources are Only 5 or Sources correctly cited in correctly cited in correctly cited in missing and/or Chicago MoS format. Chicago MoS format. Chicago MoS format. incorrectly cited. Includes at least 20 Includes at least 16 Includes at least 10 different sources. No different sources. No different sources. No plagiarism! plagiarism! plagiarism! Appendices (50%) 50 30 20 10 Excellent Good Poor Incomplete All components are Missing 2 Missing 3 to 5 Missing 6 or more complete components components components Letter of Permission Human Informed Consent Questionnaire/ Evaluation Form or Sheet Daily Logs Accomplishment Report Gantt Chart Plan for Dissemination and Advocacy Budget Allocation Curriculum VItae