Allied Joint Doctrine For Military Polic PDF
Allied Joint Doctrine For Military Polic PDF
AJP-3.2.3.3
AJP-3.2.3.3
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
(INTENTIONALLY BLANK)
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
AJP-3.2.3.3
SEPTEMBER 2009
i
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
(INTENTIONALLY BLANK)
ii
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATOlPfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
21 September 2009
Juan . MORENO
Vice dmiral, ESP(N)
Dire Of, NATO Standardization Agency
111
ORIGINAL
NATOlPfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
(INTENTIONALLY BLANK)
iv
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
v
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
(INTENTIONALLY BLANK)
vi
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
RECORD OF RESERVATIONS
2 USA
2 Annex A
vii
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
(INTENTIONALLY BLANK)
viii
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
ix
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
x
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
dead bodies.
USA a. The United States does not support the statement in paragraph
1.4.1.e that states: "Unique to the Military Police profession are
specialized police certifications, training and equipment that increases the
commander's ability to shape the operational art."
Rationale. What is supposed to be taken from AJP-3.2 is misstated.
Military Police do not shape operational art; however, they may conduct
shaping operations. Text should be corrected to read 'Unique to the MP
profession are specialized police certifications, training and equipment
that increases the commander's ability to conduct shaping operations.'
b. The United States does not subscribe to the general characterization
of military police (MP) being able to investigate Genocide, crimes against
humanity, war crimes as implied in paragraph 2.2.2.b. which states:
"Genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes can have a direct,
immediate and lasting effect on public opinion and the ability of NATO
to achieve its end-state objectives. Crimes of this nature require the
special investigative skills, techniques and equipment that Military Police
are capable of providing." This seems to place responsibility for these
types of investigations on military police.
Rationale. The majority of MP are not trained to perform these types
of specialized investigations. Within the United States, only the Army
has one special investigative branch of the Military Police Corps to
perform these functions. Similarly, the other Services have separate
smaller investigative organizations that may perform these functions.
The majority of MP can only support such investigations but would not
be the lead for such actions. The text should be corrected to read
"Genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes can have a direct
immediate and lasting effect on public opinion and the ability of NATO
to achieve its end-state objectives. Only MP with special investigative
skills, techniques and equipment are capable of investigating crimes of
this nature. MP not trained for this task may act in a supporting role."
c. The US does not subscribe to the text in paragraph 3.5.2.g. which
states: "The conduct of War Crime investigations does not differ
substantively from other criminal investigations conducted by Military
Police.
Rationale. War crime investigations require more experience and
more specialized training than given to typical MP. These fall into a
different category wherein specialized training is required. Regular MP
may only support these investigations. The text should be corrected to
read: "The conduct of war crime investigations differ substantively from
other criminal investigations and can only be performed by MP with
special investigative skills or by special military investigative
xi
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
xii
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
RECORD OF CHANGES
xiii
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
(INTENTIONALLY BLANK)
xiv
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
PREFACE
0001. This publication establishes the fundamental doctrine for Allied military police forces. It
has been developed in response to the MC 0550, NATO Military Committee Guidance for the
Military Implementation of the Comprehensive Political Guidance, and the IMSM-0387,
Tasking for the Military Implementation of the Comprehensive Political Guidance. It reflects a
common will amongst allies to assist the planning process at every stage to ensure the effective
utilization of military police (MP) assets and to standardize MP support to operations. It
describes the primary roles and characteristics of MP in support of the joint and multinational
campaign at the operational level in accordance with Allied Joint Publication (AJP)-3.2 Allied
Joint Doctrine for Land Operations. This publication is intended to educate the wider audience
of senior officers, commanders and staff officers who will be responsible for the planning and
employment of Allied MP, as well as to assist member nations in developing complementary
and interoperable forces.
0002. AJP-3.2.3.3 Allied Joint Doctrine for Military Police was designed with the
understanding that MP support to NATO operations will be conducted in a multinational
environment with contributions from several member nations. This publication is also intended
to assist the force generation process by identifying the diverse MP support capabilities
available among NATO member nations. It recognizes the varying and developing capabilities
resident in member nations and is not construed to mean member nations will provide these
capabilities. It introduces the new concept of MP activities in their combat support role to land
operations. These four activities are mobility support, security, detention and police functions.
This concept was introduced to capture the essence of the MP capabilities within the Alliance
as a whole and to assist the planning and employment of MP forces.
0003. This publication also makes extensive use of the words "military police" and "provost
marshal" though some nations do not have MP or a provost marshal (PM) as the words strictly
imply. Instead, MP is used in its generic form to encapsulate the breadth of available assets
charged with conducting police-type activities. Similarly, PM is the generic term used to define
the senior officer charged with the proponency of specialist military police advice to
commanders, establishing policy and procedures and facilitating planning for employment of
MP forces.
xv
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
xvi
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
CHAPTER 1
0101. INTRODUCTION
a. General. Military police (MP) contribute a unique, specialized skill set coupled with core
individual competencies that are not found in other areas of NATO forces. Employment of
these skills and competencies are guided by a provost marshal (PM) in support of the
commander’s objectives.
b. Role. The MP, as a combat support force multiplier, provide essential operational
assistance to combat elements and the commander through the conduct of MP activities.
c. Military Police Activities. MP support commanders at all levels through the conduct of
MP activities. Specifically, these are enabling functions that are conducted by designated
military personnel who are organized, trained and equipped using specialized MP techniques.
These enabling functions are mobility support, security, detention and police functions, which
are conducted across the full spectrum of military operations.
d. Force Suitability. MP can provide the NATO commander with a mission tailored,
specially trained and equipped force package capable of supporting NATO operations, from
peacetime military engagement to major combat operations.
e. Support Capability. MP possess a wide array of capabilities, each developed unique to the
needs of their national armed forces. The capabilities of NATO military police forces range
from a single specialized MP member operating independently to MP formations in support
of NATO forces.
b. Purpose. Doctrine serves to formalize the methods by which forces train and execute their
mission to ensure interoperability with other forces committed to accomplishing the same or
similar objectives. Doctrine also serves as a means for personnel not directly involved in the
action to plan and coordinate support for others based upon expected or known practices of
those forces in action. In this regard, Allied MP doctrine fulfils this crucial need in NATO
that allows allied nations to integrate, train and transform themselves to execute operations in
the allied campaign with seamless interoperability.
c. Scope. AJP 3.2.3.3 Allied Joint Doctrine for Military Police clarifies for commanders and
staff the principles of employment and capabilities of MP forces to facilitate efficient
1-1
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
employment of limited NATO resources at the operational level. This doctrine provides the
operational philosophy, establishes a common language and structures the manner within
which a commander plans and conducts operations. It covers the full spectrum of military
operations and is applicable to all NATO operations (both Article 5 and non-Article 5). For
MP forces, it delineates their principles and conduct of their operations in the joint and
multinational environment. It was designed with the understanding that not all activities and
subordinate tasks can be performed by every NATO nation.
d. Military Police Doctrine Structure. AJP-3.2.3.3 Allied Joint Doctrine for Military Police
fulfils the critical gap between strategic developments in land operations doctrine and
existing MP procedural publications (NATO Standardization Agreement [STANAG] 2226
NATO Military Police Doctrine and Procedures and STANAG 2085 NATO Combined
Military Police).
(1) A military police officer (special staff advisor) who provides advice directly to the
commander and staff regarding all issues related to military and civilian police activities.
(2) An officer who may be of any rank (appropriate to the headquarters) or nationality 1 and is
normally, but not necessarily, the senior MP officer in the command area. He may, or may
not, be afforded a command function (dual-hatted).
(3) Involved in the staff planning process to coordinate MP activities at all levels and during
all phases of a campaign.
(4) Invested with the MP coordination authority over all MP available assets, he provides the
functional liaison to host nation (HN) security authorities and any other police agencies
involved.
(1) Mobility Support. MP facilitate movement along lines of communication to ensure the
commander's freedom of manoeuvre throughout NATO areas of operation.
(3) Detention. MP possess unique competencies that ensure accountable custody and proper
handling of all categories of captured persons during NATO operations.
(4) Police Functions. MP assists the commander with the establishment and maintenance of
order and discipline throughout their area of operations.
1
Operational experience in NATO missions abroad indicate it is beneficial for the Provost Marshal and the Commander to be of the same
nationality.
1-2
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
(1) Mobility. MP typically possess organic transport at the lowest level of employment to
perform their mission. They are capable of reacting quickly to orders and being redirected
due to changes in priorities or conditions during operations.
(2) Flexibility. MP are capable of rapid adaptation to circumstances and leveraging other
assets to resolve problems and facilitate a return to normality.
(5) Specializations. Unique to the MP profession are specialized police certifications, training
and equipment that increases the commander's ability to conduct shaping operations.
(6) Liaison. Inherent to the performance of every MP action down to the lowest level of
employment is the conduct of liaison to improve interoperability and gather information that
improves the commander's battlefield perspective.
1-3
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
CHAPTER 2
b. Planning. Regardless of the nature of the NATO campaign undertaken (peacetime military
engagement to major combat operations), the prudent and timely inclusion of the PM in the
operational planning process will ensure early recognition of MP and civilian police issues
associated with NATO operations and enable the development of specialist responses aimed
at achieving the end-state (See Annex 2A Military Police Planning Considerations).
2-1
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
(1) Mandate and End-State. Non-Article 5 crisis response operations, in an environment
without functioning civilian structures, demands specially trained forces to effectively deal
with the civilian population. Military Police are a vital aspect of these specialty forces.
(2) Special Categories of Crimes. Genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes 1 can
have a direct, immediate and lasting effect on public opinion and the ability of NATO to
achieve its end-state objectives. Crimes of this nature require the special investigative skills,
techniques and equipment that MP are capable of providing.
(1) Adaptable. Similar to the force tailoring procedures conducted during mission planning
based upon the nature of conflict, MP can be tailored and scaled to meet the needs of the
commander in theatre.
(2) Manoeuvrist Approach. MP assist the commander by maintaining their freedom of action
to strike the enemy at a time and place of their choosing to shatter the enemy's cohesion and
will to fight.
(3) Enabling. MP activities link or create the conditions for the success of offensive,
defensive and stabilization operations by contributing MP support to all phases of a crisis
including the establishment of safe and secure environment.
(4) Command and Control. To maximize the effective use of a scarce resource such as MP,
the principles of mission command should be employed. This requires centralized planning
and decentralized control of MP resources such as communications, intelligence and
information systems that will assist the commander's span of control and situational
awareness.
a. Policy and Guidance. The current operating environment requires a joint and multinational
mindset. MP have a joint capability operating within the prescribed doctrine which
contributes to the overall mission and end-state. For this reason policy and guidance is issued
to coordinate efforts on behalf of the commander.
b. Coordination. MP perform similar functions in all components (land, air and maritime)
which allows seamless transition into joint and multinational operations. While component
MP forces deployed in support of an operation may not be joint at their respective level, in
order to achieve multinational unity of effort there must be a coordinating authority that
synchronizes MP activities to maximize interoperability.
c. Cooperation and Liaison. Similarly, MP are well suited to conducting liaison and sharing
of information with other police organizations (international, civil, and HN). These activities
1
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Part 2, Articles 5-9
2-2
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
help the commander improve their perspective regarding potential threats, environmental
permissiveness and situational awareness.
2-3
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
CHAPTER 2 ANNEX A
MILITARY POLICE PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
2A2. Origin. MP planning considerations should originate at the strategic level, and must
always consider the support and coordination requirements of other components,
governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and additional agencies
contributing to the desired end-state.
2A3. Requirements. During the planning for MP activities, requirements for coordination will
span most staff functions. This coordination will ensure centralized MP input to the staff
planning process and ensure the most effective utilization of what are often limited resources.
a. Air Component. The nature of MP support to air component operations principally consists
of the provision of security and protection required to mitigate against the threat posed by
enemy sea, land and air forces, foreign intelligence services and subversive terrorist,
extremist and criminal organizations. The MP role in the protection of aircraft, weapons
systems, personnel and associated vital resources are the primary considerations when
planning support to the air component.
c. Multinational Specialized Unit (MSU). MSU provides the commander with police forces
that have military status and training, experience and capability to deal with this area of
public security. MSU roles may include information gathering, investigations, criminal
intelligence, counter terrorism, maintenance of law and order, and public security matters.
When an MSU is established, the PM and MSU commander must cooperate closely to ensure
overlapping interests are deconflicted to improve information sharing and continuity of effort.
2-A-1
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
d. External Organizations. NATO will frequently be joined by other aid-oriented
organizations or agencies associated with security sector reform or humanitarian assistance
within a theatre of operations. It is incumbent upon MP to coordinate planning activities at the
respective level taking into account MC 0550.
e. Host Nation. When required by the mission, MP will contribute to nation building /
security sector reform through the conduct of planning, coordination, operations and liaison
with appropriate host nation authorities (law enforcement, internal security, judiciary and
prison services).
2-A-2
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
CHAPTER 3
THE FUNDAMENTALS OF MILITARY POLICE DOCTRINE
b. Role. The MP, as a combat support force multiplier, provide essential operational
assistance to combat elements and the commander through the conduct of MP activities.
c. Military Police Support to Combat Functions. MP activities can contribute to all combat
functions 1 . However, MP units may not be able to perform all tasks simultaneously, therefore
these tasks must be prioritised in parallel with the main effort.
(1) Centralized Planning. To optimise the MP’s overall contribution to operations their
activities will usually be planned centrally by the PM. This will enable rapid application of
support tasks in response to a commander's evolving campaign plan.
(2) Decentralized Control. In order to carry out assigned tasks in response to centralized
planning, the decentralized control of MP resources will enable a timely response to a
supported commander's needs at the appropriate operational or tactical level.
(3) Economy of Effort. Limited resources require that MP be allocated to the highest priority
task and that, when possible, tasks be combined. Efforts must be made to avoid duplication of
effort. Individual MP units are not likely to maintain an uncommitted reserve, and therefore,
support from other force MP elements should be coordinated through the respective PM.
1
Combat Functions are Command, Manoeuvre, Firepower, Protection, Information and Intelligence, Combat Service.
3-1
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
(1) Movement Planning. The MP assist the commander during the production of movement
plans. This planning involves the preparation for execution of tactical marches and
administrative movement of military forces, as well as population movements on military
routes. MP support these actions through the performance of tasks such as: route
reconnaissance, recommendation of routes and timings for major road movements,
sequencing priority movements, liaison between formation movement cells and other assets
that assist the movement function including civilian and host nation authorities.
(2) Movement Control. The aim of movement control is to maintain an unimpeded flow of
traffic by controlling and regulating movement on the prescribed routes; preventing
unauthorized military, civilian and refugee traffic from interfering with scheduled movement;
finding suitable detours and directing traffic over them if the recognised route becomes
blocked; following current movement progress and reporting as required to the responsible
commander; transmitting alterations in orders to columns on the move and helping with their
execution.
(3) Movement Sustainment. MP sustain the commander's mobility capability by: reporting
route conditions; reporting environmental, social, and threat factors that effect routes;
maintaining a traffic control network; maintaining control of the routes; coordinating for
route assistance (e.g. engineering, host nation).
(1) Area Security. MP are well-suited to conduct area security operations because of their
extensive mobility and communications capability, and augment the protection of critical
functions, facilities and forces. These security operations are not intended to supplant the core
security function performed by all personnel and are supplemented by the conduct of all other
MP activities.
(2) Physical Security. Physical security concerns those measures designed to safeguard
personnel, equipment, installations, materiel, and documents against espionage, sabotage,
damage, and theft. MP contribute to physical security through the conduct of threat risk
analysis, vulnerability assessments and the provision of recommendations to the commander
on mitigation strategies.
(3) Personnel Security. Personnel security is concerned with all personnel-related measures
designed to counteract the threat posed by hostile intelligence organizations, subversive
3-2
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
groups or individuals. MP (depending on national consideration) contribute to personnel
security by the conduct of security vetting and identification control.
(4) Close Protection. Designated personnel may require additional protection from criminal
and terrorist attack or abduction. MP perform close protection operations that include tactical
movement on the battlefield, specialist security teams, trained bodyguards, security drivers,
and other resources, as well as any other protective measures necessary to ensure the well-
being of such personnel.
(1) Planning and Advice. MP assist the planning for detention operations by identifying
appropriate infrastructure and guard force requirements, logistics requirements, and technical
advice on handling, processing and disposition of captured personnel, property and evidence.
As part of security sector reform, MP may also be called upon to help re-establish civilian
penitentiary or prison services. An important planning consideration is national policy being
imposed with respect to certain facets of captured persons handling (e.g., release authorities
and protocols, and the maximum time permitted to hold captured persons).
(2) Oversight and Surety. MP have the technical expertise to conduct the physical aspects of
detention operations and can serve as an additional resource for the commander to ensure
detention operations are carried out in accordance with applicable international conventions.
(1) Law Enforcement. In addition to the national requirements which require MP to enforce
applicable laws, orders and regulations necessary to assist their senior national
representatives with the maintenance of discipline, it may be necessary to establish a general
law enforcement support capability that will enable the joint commander to respond to law
enforcement requirements across the NATO structure. During the conduct of security sector
reform operations, MP are extremely well-suited to assist with the planning, training,
monitoring and mentoring of host-nation police services.
3-3
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
(2) Investigation. Offences committed against NATO personnel or property, reduce morale,
military discipline, and adversely affect operations and perceptions. Investigation of such
incidents is necessary to preserve a commander’s operational capabilities. MP may also
investigate civilian criminal activities when there is no viable civil or host nation police force
capable of doing so.
(3) Crime Prevention. MP assist commanders with the development of an effective crime
prevention plan. The plan includes the criminal threat, specific areas of concern to a
commander, recommendations for possible deterrents, restrictions and curfews.
(5) Crowd and Riot Control Activities. This includes that MP support required to help
establish, restore or improve public behaviour requisite to the efficient functioning of
government utilizing specially trained personnel knowledgeable of the graduated use of force,
crowd dynamics and culturally aware of causal events for the situation. When other dedicated
units perform these tasks, MP liaise with these units and may contribute to this function as
required.
(6) Dogs. MP forces possess a wide array of military working dog capabilities that can serve
as force multipliers for the commander. Dependent on the training received, military working
dogs are capable of providing advance warning of ground-based threats and are uniquely
adapted for low-light search conditions in large buildings and confined spaces. Specially
trained dogs may also help to indicate the presence of explosive materials, mines, dead bodies
or drugs.
(7) War Crimes. The conduct of war crime investigations does not differ substantively from
other criminal investigations conducted by MP. While the long-term investigative and
prosecutorial responsibility for war crimes may not fall within the immediate scope of NATO
operations, the consequences of inappropriate responses to allegations of war crimes could
undermine the overall credibility and effectiveness of NATO. It is imperative, therefore, that
NATO operations planners recognize the role played by MP as first responders to potential
war crimes scenes.
3-4
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
LEXICON
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
PART 1 – ABBREVIATIONS
The Lexicon contains abbreviations relevant to AJP- 3.2.3.3 and is not meant to be
exhaustive. The definitive and more comprehensive list of abbreviations is in AAP-15.
Lex - 1
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
PART 2 – TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
campaign
A set of military operations planned and conducted to achieve a strategic objective within a
given time and geographical area, which normally involve maritime, land and air forces.
(AAP 6)
command
1. The authority vested in an individual of the armed forces for the direction, coordination,
and control of military forces.
2. An order given by a commander; that is, the will of the commander expressed for the
purpose of bringing about a particular action.
3. A unit, group of units, organization or area under the authority of a single individual.
4. To dominate an area of situation.
5. To exercise command. (AAP 6)
combat support
Fire support and operational assistance provided to combat elements. (AAP 6)
end state
The political and/or military situation to be attained at the end of an operation, which
indicates that the objective has been achieved. (AAP 6)
host nation
A nation which, by agreement:
a. receives forces and materiel of NATO or other nations operating on/from or transiting
through its territory;
b. allows materiel and/or NATO organizations to be located on its territory; and/or
c. provides support for these purposes. (AAP 6)
information
Unprocessed data of every description which may be used in the production intelligence.
(AAP 6)
intelligence
The product resulting from the processing of information concerning foreign nations, hostile
or potentially hostile forces or elements, or areas of actual or potential operations. The term is
also applied to the activity which results in the product and to the organizations engaged in
such activity. (AAP 6)
interoperability
The ability to operate in synergy in the execution of assigned tasks. (AAP 6)
joint
Adjective used to describe activities, operations and organisations in which elements of at
least two services participate. (AAP 6)
Lex - 2
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
joint force
A force composed of significant elements of two or more Services operating under a single
commander authorised to exercise operational command or control. (Derived from ‘Joint’
AAP-6)
manœuvre
1. A movement to place ships or aircraft in a position of advantage over the enemy.
2. A tactical exercise carried out at sea, in the air, on the ground, or on a map in imitation of
war.
3. The operation of a ship, aircraft, or vehicle, to cause it to perform desired movements.
4. Employment of forces on the battlefield through movement in combination with fire, or
fire potential, to achieve a position of advantage in respect to the enemy in order to
accomplish the mission. (AAP 6)
provost marshal
The PM serves as the commander's proponent for policy, plans, procedures and doctrine for
MP. The provision of advice on the role and employment of MP in support of NATO
operations is provided at the strategic, operational and tactical level to the respective
commander. (This term is a new term and definition, is being staffed for ratification within
the context of this publication, and will be recommended for inclusion in the NTDB and
AAP-6)
Lex - 3
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
Lex - 4
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.2.3.3
REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS
MC 0550 NATO Military Committee Guidance for the Military Implementation of the
Comprehensive Political Guidance
Ref - 1
ORIGINAL
NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED