Statutory Construction
Statutory Construction
NOTE: This should not be applied if the letters of the Exception in the Statute
statute is without ambiguity. When the law does not make any exception, courts may
not except something unless compelling reasons exist to
1. When the construction of the law departs from the justify it.
purpose, it should be rejected.
2. If there would be two statutory interpretations, the General and Special Terms
one serving the purpose of the law will prevail General terms in a statute are to receive a general
3. When the reason of the law ceases, so does the law construction, unless restrained by the context or by plain
itself. (Cessante ratione legis, cessat ipsa lex) inferences from the scope and purpose of the act.
General terms may be limited by specific terms or
Implications (ex necessitate legis) provisions associated with them.
Necessary Implications and intendments from the
language are as much part of the law as those expressed. NOTE: Only applicable to cases where, except for the
It must be so strong in its probability that the contrary of general term, all items enumerated fall under one
the implication would be absurd. But it cannot contradict specific class.
the expressed because the latter prevails over the intent
supposed by the implication. Special terms in a statute may sometimes be expanded to
a general signification by the consideration that the
NOTE: If intent is expressed, no need for implications. reason of the law is general.
Cassus Omissus (casus omissus pro omisso habendus General Terms following Special Terms (ejusedem
est) generis)
When a statute makes specific provision in regard to Where general words follow an enumeration of persons
several cases or objects but omits to make any provision or things, by specific terms, such general words are not
for a case or object which is analogous to those to be construed in their widest extent, but are to be held
enumerated, and the omission is because it was as applying only to the same general kind or class as
overlooked or unforeseen, the court cannot supply for those specifically mentioned.
the defects or omission.
NOTE: Not applied where the legislative intent is plain
Stare Decisis (stare decisis et non quieta movere) and contrary
Follow past precedents and do not disturb what has
been settled. The doctrine states that the courts must Express Mention and Implied Exclusion (expressio
stand by precedents, principles of law that has been laid unius est exclusio alterius)
down to be applicable to certain state of facts, and not Express mention of one person of thing, person, or
disturb a settled point, as long as the facts are consequence is tantamount to an express exclusion of all
substantially the same. others.
This is grounded on the separation of powers. The court Literal interpretation should be rejected if it would result
deems that the joint act of the legislative and executive to unjust or absurd results.
to create and pass a law was carefully studied and
determined to be constitutional before being finally Presumption Against Violation of International Law
enacted. It is the presumption of the courts that the law is in
accordance with Public international law as Sec 2 Article
NOTE: If there are other basis the courts can use for its II of the constitution declares that the Philippines adopts
decision, the constitutionality of the assailed law will be and generally accepts principles of international law as
disregarded. part of the law of the land.
LLDA v. CA
LLDA is given authority to issue permits in Laguna
Lake under special law. Admin Code was later on passed
giving municipal government to issue permits with
regards to fisheries. SC ruled that LLDA, being a special
law, is an exception to the general law that is Admin
Code. Hence, LLDA still has authority to issue permits
over Laguna Lake.
Notes
A substantive law cannot be repealed by a procedural
law.