Scribd
Upload
22 views

Literature Review References

The document references many sources from 1975 to 2007 about women in science and engineering careers. It discusses challenges women have faced and initiatives to address underrepresentation. The references cover topics like work-life balance, hiring and retention, and the impact of marriage and motherhood on scientific careers.

Uploaded by

Tanzil Islam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
22 views

Literature Review References

The document references many sources from 1975 to 2007 about women in science and engineering careers. It discusses challenges women have faced and initiatives to address underrepresentation. The references cover topics like work-life balance, hiring and retention, and the impact of marriage and motherhood on scientific careers.

Uploaded by

Tanzil Islam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

References

Bailyn, L. (2003). Academic careers and gender equity: Lessons learned from MIT. Gender,
Work & Organization, 10(2), 137-153.
Baker, B. (2000). Recruiting minorities to the biological sciences. Bioscience, 50(3), 191-
196.
Bar-Haim, G., & Wilkes, J. M. (1988). Comparisons of male and female student aspirants to
a scientific career: Perceptions of promising science talents. International Journal of
Comparative Sociology, 29(3-4), 187-201.
Baum, E. (1990). Recruiting and graduating women: The underrepresented student. IEEE
Communications Magazine, 28(12), 47-50.
Beasley, R. E., Lomo-David, E., & Seubert, V. R. (2001). Telework and gender: Implications
for the management of information technology professionals. Industrial Management
+ Data Systems, 101(8/9), 477.
Betz, N. (1997). What stops women and minorities from choosing and completing majors in
science and engineering? In D. Johnson (Ed.), Minorities and girls in school: Effects
on achievement and performance. (pp. 105-140) Sage Publications, Inc.
Bodger, C. (1985). Sixth annual salary survey: Who does what and for how much. Working
Woman,
10(1), 65.
Boiarsky, C., Earnest, P., Grove, L., Northrup, B., & Phillips, M. (1993). Women in technical
and scientific fields: Results of a national survey. Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE
International Professional Communication Conference, Oct 5-8 1993, 199-207. from
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.1993.593856
Brown, J. M. (1975). Women in the world of engineering. IEEE Transactions on Education,
E-18(1), 3- 10.
Byko, M. (2005). Challenges and opportunities for women in science and engineering. JOM,
57(4), 12.
Caruana, C. M., & Mascone, C. F. (1992). Women ChEs face substantial sexual harassment.
U.S.Woman Engineer, 38(4), 10-14.
Cole, J. R. (1981). Women in science. American Scientist, 69(4), 385-391.
Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1987). Marriage, motherhood and research performance in
science.
Scientific American, 256(2), 119-126.
Culotta, E., Kahn, P., Koppel, T., & Gibbons, A. (1993). Women struggle to crack the code
of corporate culture. (Women in science '93: Gender & culture) (cover story).
Science; 260(5106), 398-404.
DiNitto, D., Aguilar, M. A., Franklin, C., & Jordan, C. (1995). Over the edge? women and
tenure in today's academic environment. Affilia: Journal of Women & Social Work,
10(3), 255-279.
Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices: Applying
the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women
Quarterly, 18(4), 585- 609.
Etzkowitz, H., & Kemelgor, C. (1994). The paradox of critical mass for women in science.
Science,
266(5182), 51-54.
Tobias, S., & Chubin, D. E. (1996). Chutes and ladders. Sciences, 36(4), 17-21.
Vetter, B. (1992). Ferment: Yes; progress: Maybe; change: Slow. Mosaic, 23(3), 34-41.
Warner, M. D. (1985). Women in analytical chemistry--equality at last? Analytical
Chemistry, 57(13), 1358A-60A,1362A,1364A.
Wax, A. L. (2004). Family-friendly workplace reform: Prospects for change. Annals of the
American Academy of Political and Social Science, 596, 36-61.
Widnall, S. E. (1988). AAAS presidential lecture: Voices from the pipeline. Science,
241(4874), 1740- 1745.
Wilde, C. (1997). Women cut through IT's glass ceiling. Information Week, (614), 83.
Wiley, M. G., & Crittenden, K. S. (1992). By your attributions you shall be known:
Consequences of attributional accounts for professional and gender identities. Sex
Roles, 27(5-6), 259-276.
Williams, J. C. (1989). Deconstructing gender. Michigan Law Review, 87(4), 797.
Yates, J. K. (2001). Retention of nontraditional engineering and construction professionals.
Journal of Management in Engineering, 17(1), 41-49.
Zuckerman, H., & Cole, J. R. (1975). Women in American science. Minerva, 13(1), 82-102.

Ambrose, S., Dunkle, K., Lazarus, B., Nair, I., & Harkus, D. (Eds.) (1997). Journeys
of women in science and engineering: No universal constants. Philadelphia: Temple
University Press.
Davis, C., Ginorio, A., Hollenshead, C., Lazarus, B., Rayman, P., & Associates. (Eds.)
(1996). The equity equation: Fostering the advancement of women in the sciences,
mathematics and engineering. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
National Science Foundation. (2007). National action plan for addressing the critical needs
of the U.S. science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education system.
NSB-07-114.
Rayman, P., & Brett, B. (1993). Pathways for women in the sciences. Center for Research on
Women: Wellesley College.
Rayman, P., & Stewart, J. (1999). Reaching for success in science: Women’s uneven journey.
The Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 869, 58-65.
Wylie, A., Jakobsen, J., & Fosado, G. (2007). Women, work and the academy. New York:
Barnard Center for Research on Women.

You might also like