Volumetric-Deviatoric Decomposition
Volumetric-Deviatoric Decomposition
CONTINUUM MECHANICS
lecture notes 08
Volumetric–deviatoric decomposition
in analogy to the strain tensor ǫ, the stress tensor σ can
be additively decomposed into a volumetric part σ vol and
a traceless deviatoric part σ dev
68
3 Balance equations
Volumetric stress
volumetric part σ vol of stress tensor σ
1 1 (3.1.27)
σ vol = 3
[σ : I ] I = 3
[ I ⊗ I ] : σ = IIvol : σ
interpretation of trace as hydrostatic pressure
p = 13 tr(σ ) = 1
3 σ : I = 31 (σ11 + σ22 + σ33 ) (3.1.28)
index representation
69
3 Balance equations
Deviatoric stress
deviatoric stress tensor σ dev preserves the volume and con-
taines the remaining part of the total stress tensor σ
deviatoric part σ dev of the stress tensor σ
σ dev = σ − σ vol = σ − 1
3
[σ : I ] I = IIdev : σ (3.1.31)
index representation
70
3 Balance equations
Normal–shear decomposition
assume we are interested in the
stress σn normal to a particular tσ
σn
plane characterized through its
n
normal n, i.e. the normal pro- σt
jection of the stress vector t σ
σn = t σ · n = [ σ t · n] · n = σ t : [ n ⊗ n] = σ t : N (3.1.35)
normal–shear (tangential) decomposition of stress vector t σ
tσ = σ n + σ t (3.1.36)
normal stress vector – stress in direction of n
σ n = [ σ t : [ n ⊗ n]] n = σ t : [ n ⊗ n ⊗ n] (3.1.37)
shear (tangential) stress vector – stress in the plane
σ t = t σ − σ n = σ t · n − σ t : [ n ⊗ n ⊗ n]
(3.1.38)
t sym t
= σ : [II · n − n ⊗ n ⊗ n] = σ : T
amount of shear stress τn
||τn ||2 = (t σ − σ n ) · (tσ − σ n ) = t σ · t σ − 2t σ · σ n + σn2 n · n
(3.1.39)
and thus
√ q
τn = || σ t || = σt · σt = t σ · t σ − σn2 (3.1.40)
in general, i.e. for an arbitrary direction n, we have normal
and shear contributions to the stress vector, however, three
particular directions {nσ i }i=1,2,3 can be identified, for which
t σ = σ n and thus σ t = 0, the corresponding {nσ i }i=1,2,3 are
called prinicpal stress directions and {σn i }i=1,2,3 = {λσi }i=1,2,3
are the principal stresses
71
3 Balance equations
Principal stresses
assume stress tensor σ t to be known at x ∈ B , principal
stresses {λσ i }i=1,2,3 and principal stress directions {nσ i }i=1,2,3
can be derived from solution of special eigenvalue problem
according to §1.1.3
σ t · nσ i = λ σ i n σ i [ σ t − λσ i ] · nσ i = 0 (3.1.41)
solution
det (σ t − λσ I ) = 0 (3.1.42)
or in terms of roots of characteristic equation
λ3σ − Iσ λ2σ + I Iσ λσ − I I Iσ = 0 (3.1.43)
roots of characteristic equation in terms of principal invari-
ants of σ t
Iσ = tr (σ t ) = λσ1 + λσ2 + λσ3
I Iσ = 12 [tr2 (σ t ) − tr (σ t 2 )] = λσ2 λσ3 + λσ3 λσ1 + λσ1 λσ2
I I Iσ = det (σ t ) = λσ1 λσ2 λσ3
(3.1.44)
spectral representation of σ
3
t
σ = ∑ λσi nσi ⊗ nσi (3.1.45)
i =1
principal stresses λσi are purely normal, no shear stress τn in
principal directions, i.e. t σi = σ n = λσi nσi and σ t = 0 thus
τn = 0
due to symmetry of stresses σ = σ t, stress tensor posseses
three real eigenvalues {λσ i }i=1,2,3, corresponding eigendi-
rections {nσ i }i=1,2,3 are thus orthogonal nσi · nσj = δij
72
3 Balance equations
73
3 Balance equations
∂B̄ B̄ x n qn
{ei }i=1,2,3
definition of contact heat flux qn in analogy to Cauchy’s pos-
tulate, lemma and theorem originally introduced for the mo-
mentum flux in §3.1.2
Cauchy’s postulate
qn = qn ( x, n) (3.1.52)
Cauchy’s lemma
Cauchy’s theorem
the contact heat flux qn can be expressed as linear function
of the surface normal n and the heat flux vector q
qn = q · n (3.1.54)
74
3 Balance equations
q = qi e i (3.1.55)
Cauchy’s theorem
qn = q · n (3.1.56)
index representation
geometric interpretation
q3
e3 q2
e1 e2
q1
75