1 Special A1card for

E:rccl/Illcr ... . ......... pagl 7

2 Sled SO/Vl' .• Some Thol'11Y
Problem .• ............. . page 9
9 Sleel Bu .• ill! Frame .• Roof
For H lJ'ayollal School . ... page 10
MODERN STEEL
CONSTRUCnON •
Published by VOLUME VII NUMBER 3 THIRD QUARTER 1967

American Institute
of Steel Construction
101 P.rk Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10017
CONTENTS

Steel Solves Some Thorny Problems 3

OFFICERS Special Award For Excellence 7
J. Philip Murphy, President PO Moves Into New High-Rise Apartment 8
Eugene J. Pidgeon, First Vice President
Edwin H. Webster, Second Vice President
Steel Easily Frames Roof For Hexagonal School 10
William R. Jackson, Treasurer Instead of A Billboard 12
John K. Edmonds, Architecture and Regimentation 13
Executive Vice President
Leslie H. Gillette,
Assistant Executive Vice President
M. Harvey Smedley,
Counsel and Secretary
YOUR LOCAL AISC REGIONAL ENGINEER

EDITORIAL STAFF
Daniel Farb, Editor
On the outside back cover of this issue you will find the names
and addresses of the A /SC Regional Engineering staff. These
92 professional structural engineers, operating out of 26 region-
al officcs, are ready to assist architects and engineers ,dth any
•
structuml steel design problem. The techniques of steel design
REGIONAL OFFICES
are changing rapidly and it is difficult for designcrs to keep
Atlanta, Georgia
Birmingham, Alabama inlormed about all the new developments and their advantages.
Boston, Massachusetts
Chicago, Illinois
Because the A/SC Regional Engineer is a specialist in steel
Cleveland, Ohio construction and is aware 01 new methods belore they are
Columbus, Ohio
Dallas, Texas widely publicized, he is in a unique positiot! to assist the design
Denver, Colorado
Detroit, Michigan
prolessions.
Charlotte, North Carolina
Hartford, Connecticut We suggest that you contact your local Regional Engineer
Houston, Texas early in the preliminary stages of dcsign - to get his sugges-
Los Angeles, California
Memphis, Tennessee tions for the most economical steellraming for your project.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Minneapolis, Minnesota
He may be able to suggest new ideas and new economies that
New York, New York didn't exist a short wht1e ago. And once a design is under way,
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Omaha, Nebraska if YOlt have a difficult detail or a problem connection Ot· need a
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania new way to solve an old problem, call on your local AlSC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

•
St. louis, Missouri Regional Engineer - he wants to help.
San Francisco, California
Seattle, Washington
Syracuse, New York
Washington, District of Columbia
Imaginative design and the versatility
of modern steel construction made it
possible to fulfill some difficult archi-
tectural and structural design goals for
•
the new 21-story Bank of California
Building in San Francisco. The success-
ful architectural blending of a twentieth
century tower and a Greco-Roman bank-
ing office, and the use of cantilevered
framing to provide useable floor space
equivalent to 9 additional stories of con -
ventional vertical construction, were
two of the major achievements of archi-
tects Anshen & Allen and structural en·
gineers H. J. Degenkolb & Associates.

Architectural Solution
The architects were commissioned to
provide a structure that would neither
dominate nor clash in appearance with
the classic low structure that had been
the Bank of California's main office
since 1908. The sixty year old San Fran-
cisco landmark was the first major struc-
ture to rise after the devastating earth-

•
quake and fire in April, 1906.

« ~------;-------~-------,
o

.
"

EXISTING
BANK BUILDING

.. R~....!J,.....
W

•
MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION
.-

• It might have been difficult to achieve

these aims with a new structure essen-
tially the same size as the 1908 build-
ing. But the bank's need for more office
space and the limitations of the site de-
manded a high-rise structure - an even
more challenging proposition.
The thinking that led to the final de-
sign is explained below by Derek Parker,
AlA, partner in charge of the project:
" The principal facade of the existing
bank is a powerful symme trical design .
Equally strong symmetry in the new
structure would have drawn attention
away from the older building: made
them seem separate entities. That's why
we chose an unsymmetrical design. In
this way, the two buildings have the best
chance of being linked visually as one
institution.
"We also subordinated the horizontal
dimensions of anyone face on the new
building to the 87-ft width of the bank
facade. In some measure, this keeps the
taller building in harmonious scale with

•
the bank and neighboring structures. We
broke up the mass easily enough with
elevator shafts and stair towers.
"Studies of comparative heights con-
vinced us that the high-rise addition, if
more than four times the height of the
bank, would prove overbearing. The ex- New framing ('(t)ltil('l'('TIJ 29/ut jllto air spo(' 01' r thrlandmark
isting bank is approximately 51'2 stories J 908 bllildiJ'l1. Cantilevers 0" thrcr sidrs prot'idr floor .pau
rquit'al(,Jlt to 9 additional.torie,.
high. The new tower has 21 stories.
"The IO-ft setback of the new tower
gives greater prominence to the historic
building than it originally enjoyed. And
the small plaza the setback creates
should prove an agreeable civic addition
for the area.
"We felt very strongly that a vertical
entrance to the new building would com-
pete with the pronounced vertical lines
in the older bank. Thus we've designed
the new entrance on the horizontal,
broad and low.

Arch itect: Anshen & Allen,

San Francisco, Calif.
Structural En,ineers: H. J. Degenkolb &

•
Associates, San Francisco, Calif.
General Contracto r: Cahill Construction Co.,
San Francisco, Calif.
Steel Fabr icator: Murphy-Pacific Corp.,
San FranCISco, Calif.

THIRD QUARTER 1967

"Finally, the pale gray of the precast
concrete panels encasing the tower will
be matched to the granite of the 1905
erection of the building out-of-plumb to
compensate for the resulting sidesway.
The new heavy series of rolled steel
in this unusual, though not unique,
method was to drill 20-in. diameter holes
SO ft deep on 4-ft centers along the
•
building. A portion of the old stone was columns, with weights up to 734 Ibs foundation lines. 24WF soldier beams
steam cleaned to assure a perfect per ft, were used in this building for the were inserted in the holes, and trenches
match, and the building project includes first time west of Chicago. All columns scooped out between the beams to the
a steam bath for the landmark building are ASTM A441 steel, and all other fram- SO-ft depth. The trenches were filled
after the official opening." ing members are A36 steel. All connec- with concrete, making a solid. 2-ft wide
tions were field bolted with ASTM A325 beam-reinforced bulkhead. Then exca-
Sleel Framing and A490 high strength bolts. Cellular vation began for the first basement.
The building, consisting of three steel decking and lightweight concrete When the hole was 12 ft deep, steel
basements, 19 office floors and two were used for the floors. was placed for the ground floor and first
mechanical penthouse levels, is built Gross area for the new annex is ap· basemen!. Temporary diagonal bracing
with a moment-resisting structural steel proximately 300,000 sq ft, with a net was bolted to the upper and lower beams
frame. Thus, both vertical and lateral area of 243,000 sq ft. Estimated cost along the 143-ft length of the excavation
(wind and seismic) forces are held in for the entire project is $12.5 million. to form trusses which not only shored
check. On the east side of the building, up the excavation walls but served as
the 6th to 19th floors are cantilevered Unusual Foundalions "hooks" from which the subterranean
out 29 ft into the air space over the Once construction was under way, steelwork was hung as the excavation
older banking offices. This cantilever sleel began solving other problems. For proceeded. Filler beams across the 10S-
increased the square footage by I ,S40 example, bank management wanted a ft width provided lateral bracing for the
sq ft per floor. Shorter cantilevers from three-basemenl building. This required trusses. An Soft-thick, steel-reinforced
the 2nd to the 19th floors on the north a foundation 55 ft deep. However. Ihe foundation mat "bottomed-out" the
and south sides provide an additional new building is located on filled land, foundation.

•
1,260 sq ft at each of those floors. The roughly 6 ft above sea level, and wilh a The weight of the dirt excavation from
cantilevered girders were fabricated water table 14 ft below streel level. the site approximated the weight of the
from steel plate, and on the east side To overcome the barriers to normal new building. As a result, the building
were 42 in. deep. The unusualy long can- foundation construction, the basements "floats" on the alluvial deposits with-
tilevers on the east side required the were built from the top down. First step out any significant settling.

Canti/~l'('r{'d g;rdrr, arc ~2-i" . deep. Dllrtu'ork pa,se. Basement framing .teel U'Q' h1Ulg from trul8cs/ormcci by beam.
thTtJIIgh stiffened )I,th cltlouta. and temporary diagonal brace..

MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION

•
, ,.)
, ,.)

•
The Gateway Arch , Jefferson National Expansion Memorial, Sl Louis, Missouri

SPECIAL AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE

A special award of recognition has been Architect:
Eero Saarinen and Associates
made by AISC to The Gateway Arch as "an out·
Structural Engineer
standing achievement in technology and aes· Severud-Perrone-Sturm-Conlin-Bandel,
Consulting Engineers
thetics". In honoring the boldness of the design
General Contractor:

•
of this memorial to the Ameri can pioneers, the MacDonald Construction Company
AISC Board of Directors paid tribute to the men Steel Fabricator & Erector:
Plttsburgh·Des Moines Steel Company
whose imagination, courage and technical skill
Owner:
created a unique and monumental landmark. National Park Service, Dept. of the Interior

THIRD QUARTER 1967 7

• •

Architect: Sheridan, Behm and Associates,

Arlington, Va.
Structural EnKineer: Horatio Allison
Associates, Rockvi lie, Md.
General Contractor: Leegate Corporation,
Falls Church, Va.
Steel Fabricator: Ingalls Iron Works Co.,
Birmingham, Ala.

•
Nearlycompleted in Bladensburg, Md., The building was originally conceived ventional method for steel construction)
is the first plastically designed high-rise as an 8-story structure. However, by rais- the load-carrying capabilities of steel
building in the United States - The Ste- ing the height of the building to 11 stor- members are based on their strength in
venson Apartments. This pioneer struc- ies, and reducing the number of square the elastic range, in which the steel is
ture is the first of a new breed of multi- feet per floor, the designers maintained not stressed beyond the yield point. This
story steel framed apartment, office, the amount of rentable space available means that beams deflect under load,
dormitory and hospital buildings that and obtained considerable added sur- but return to their original position if
will be lighter, more economical and face parking space. Plastic design utiliz- the load is removed. However, the maxi-
more efficient than ever before. ing high-strength steels saved nearly 10 mum strength of stee l beams is not ac-
During early planning stages of the percent of the cost of conventional fram- tually reached until after the yield point
project, structural engineers Horatio AI- ing, enough to offset a premium in cost has been exceeded. Plastic design safely
I ison Associates of Rockvi lie, Md., i nves- per floor due to adding the extra floors. utilizes this reserve strength in calculat-
tigated the use of the new multi-story ing the load-carrying ability of steel
plastic design criteria resulting from a Plastic vs. Elastic members, and results in more efficient
10-year research project at Lehigh Uni- Plastic design of one- and two-story use of the inherent strength of structural
versity. They determined that through steel framing has proven its efficiency steel framing.
the use of plastic design, not only could and economy in many structures built The behavior of buildings utilizing
a significant amount of weight be pared during the last decade. However, until plastic design under service loads is es-
from the structure, with corresponding completion of the Lehigh study, no de- sentially the same as for those designed •
reduction in framing and foundation finitive criteria had been established for within the elastic limit, since structural
costs, but more efficient utilization of application of the method to multi-story members are not actually stressed to the
the site could be also achieved. buildings. With elastic design (the con- yield point. Even experienced sidewalk

8 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION

superintendents could not see anything beams would have been 10WF21 in a structure. assured that analysis and
different in the framework of The Ste- conventional building (a difference of computations were reviewed by quali-
venson Apartments; it looked just the 40 percent in weight). Column sizes vary fied authorities. Representatives from
same as any other multi-story structure. from 8WF67 in the basement to 8WF24 the County Department of Inspection
in the roof. Columns are A36 (36,000 psi and Permits met With a team composed
Struetural Featu res
yield) and A572 (50,000 psi yield). Hori- of the structural engineers and Dr.
The building is 271 It long and 53 It zontal framing is all A36. George Driscoll of Fritz Engineering
wide. Lateral loading is resisted across Laboratory at Lehigh University, plus
the building's width by four cross-braced Cost
representatives from Bethlehem Steel
bays carried in partitions at each level. Total cost of the erected steel frame- Corporation and two local structural
No bracing is required along the length work, including steel joists for the floor engineering firms.
of the building. The architects and en- system, amounted to $1.17 per sq It for The building will contain 150 one-
gineers carefully coordinated the floor the 160,000 sq ft building. The cost for and two-bedroom units. A basement level
plan to fit the framework and to permit the steel frame, deck, lightweight con- will contain a large recreation room,
regular column spacing with no costly crete topping, and a plasterboard ceiling laundry and storage, plus a limited num-
short or offset spans. With this arrange- amounted to $1.91 per Sq ft, a saving ber of parking spaces. A sun deck will
ment, the cost of design, fabrication and of 10 percent from the $2.10 per sq It be located on the roof. Many apartments

•
detailing was held to a minimum. estimated for conventional flat plate will have balconies. Six of the first floor
The steel frame is all-welded. Beams concrete construction. apartments on the uphill side of the
are lighter and columns smaller than in The building department of Prince sloping lot will have private patios. Ex-
similar elastically designed apartment Georges County, Md., gave special per- terior finish will be brick. featuring light-
structures. The typical 10WFJ5 floor mission to use plastic design in this colored recessed brick panels.

THIRD QUARTER 1967 ,

•

Steel Easily Frames Roof

For Hexagonal School
Robert P. Lathrop, P.E. and Ciprian A. Pauroso, P.E.
•
The versatility of steel framing was
certainly demonstrated in the unusual
design of the High Hill Elementary
School in Madison, Connecticut. Set
high on a beautiful rolling 52 acre site,

-Q- the building takes form from hexagonal

classrooms arranged principally around
a hexagonal multi·purpose room. Not
only did the design capture the imagin·
ation of all who were involved wi th it.
but it proved to be an ideal architectura l
solution for the needs of the community.
Stecker & Colavecchio. Architects. in
developing the planning of the school,
succeeded in designing a building that
is economical. yet more aesthetically
pleasing than the usual "glass and brick
box". The design also permitted class·
rooms to be clustered according to the

Mr. Lathrop is Partner in the consulting •

engineering firm of Onderdonk, La throp,
Coel of Glastonbury. Connecticut. Mr.
Pauroso is AISC Regional Engineer in
Hartford, Connecticut.

10 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION

various pupil age levels, thus prevent-

• ing the young children from being over-

whelmed by the surrounding building.
Although the unusual shape of the
building indicated that the structural
design might well become complicated
and indeterminate, once steel was se·
lected as the structural medium the
development of the framing became
relatively simple. The roof extends to
provide a canopy completely around
each unit, broad enough to warrant omis-
sion of a gutter drainage system. Where
each pair of classroom units abuts, the
roof is oriented to provide maximum
overhang, the roof girders cantilevering
21 ft. This arrangement results in a
covered out·of-doors play area.
Exposed wood was first considered
for the roof structural system, but was
discarded when required sizes for the
large cantilevers became impractical. Considering the shape of the building, important, the $930 pupil cost was 13
Steel easily and economically handled construction was accomplished with re- percent less than the state average of
the cantilevers with minimum beam markable ease. Careful detailing by the $1,069 for elementary schools built in
depths. Originally an exposed steel sys- architects and engineers, good advance the period. The hexagonal shape contrib-
tem with precast insulating plank was planning by the General Contractor, and uted to the efficient use of space and
considered, but cost studies indicated erection by the steel fabricator certainly structural steel was able to frame the
it was just as economical and more at- were responsible for thi s. Only 10 roof economically.

•
tractive to use metal deck and hung months elapsed from ground-breaking to
ceilings. occupancy of the school. Complete steel
The weight of framing steel averages erection required two weeks. Architects: Stecker & Colavecchio,
less than 8 Ibs/sq It of roof area, de- The 19 classrooms, two kindergar- Hartford, Connecticut.
spite the pyramidal forms and long tens, offices, library and multi-purpose Structural Engineers: Onderdonk, Lathrop,
room add up to an area of 38,522 sq ft Cael, Glastonbury, Connecticut.
spans involved. At each hip, girders were
General Contractor: Plerettl Construction
designed to cantilever over the exterior with a pupil capacity of 670. The square Company, Essex, Connecticut
columns, supporting the extensive can- foot cost of $16.91 compares favorably Steel Fabricator: Connecticut Steel Co.,
opy areas over the outside sheltered with other elementary schools, but more New Haven, Connecticut.
play areas, and tapered to give a lighter
and more airy feeling for these spaces.
Additional sub-girders were used where
necessary to ensure that the purlins were
no deeper than 10 in. (an architectural
consideration.) All purl ins were circum-
ferential in layout and hence horizontal.
Fabrication of the steel was rapid,
with a minimum of shop problems. The
tapered girders were formed from
16WF58 rolled sections. By cutting the
webs diagonally, reversing the top and
bottom halves and rewelding the webs,
the desired taper was achieved. All sec-
ondary framing connections were stand-
ard, in most cases one-sided. Skewed
connections were made with bent plates.
Butt-end plate moment connections

•
were used wherever continuity of beams
was required through girders. This type
of connection was particularly efficient
and attractive at the exposed roof over-
hang around the multi-purpose room.

THIRD QUARTER 1967 11

•
ARCHITECTURE
AND
REGIMENTATION
by David N. Yerkes, FAIA

Mr. Yerkes is a partner in the firm of Deigert and

Yerkes and AsSOCiates, Arch itects, Washington, O. C.
and is Director, Middle Atla ntiC Region, AlA.

•
Several months ago I was a member of a Jury I hope the conditions of an increasingly
that met in New York to select the winners of mechanized and regimented society will not
the AISC Architectural Awards of Excellence for mean that the door is closed to this sort of cre·
1967. looking again at the photographs of the ative individualism. I think there is a real risk
winners several months later. I am impressed by that this will happen. Powerful forces are con-
the fact that they are a very workmanlike and stantly pushing us in the direction of increased
competent group of buildings. I use those ad- standardization. But if we permit this process to
jectives without implying either praise or criti· destroy the uniqueness of the individual, we are
cism. because they describe a quality which accepting the fact that the machine has mas·
most of these buildings share. These are not tered us, instead of the reverse. Whether life
the intensely personal and dramatic efforts of will be worth living in the sort of society which
strong individualists; nor are they routine prod· is the logical conclusion of this process is cer·
ucts. mechanically turned out by architects who tainlya matter for doubt.
were uninterested in design. They are the work of I hold no brief for the exhibitionists and op-
skillful and conscientious designers. using the portunists in the architectural profession who
vocabulary that is commonly accepted at this are out to catch the public eye at any price. But
point in architectural history, attempting to solve I uphold the value of genuine creativity as one
practical problems, seriously concerned about of the most precious qualities any individual. or
the aesthetic quality of their buildings. any society, can have. To encourage it Involves
We hear scathing comments about architects some risks and requires courage. I hope that our
designing buildings as "monuments to them· society will continue to produce individuals -
selves". What is usually referred to is a building both architects and cl ients - who are sufficiently
which is, or attempts to be, strongly individual- daring and perceptive to recogn ize real creative
istic, conspicuously outside the main stream of power and cherish it.
contemporary architecture . Some of these Since this creative power, at least at full
" monuments" are blatant efforts to attract atten· strength, is such a rare quality, it is not surpris·
tion. They are advertising. with no claim to ser· ing that the buildings submitted for AISC Archi·
ous consideration as architecture. But others are tectural Awards of Excellence showed it only in

•
the work of thoughtful and gifted designers who diluted form - at least in my judgment. On the
are genuinely creative. Creativity is almost synon- other hand, the fact that many of the submis·
ymous with originality, and the buildings of the sions represent such a high degree of compe·
truly creative architect are likely to be different. tence, ingenuity. and sound aesthetic jUdgment,
unusual, arresting. is a matter for real satisfaction.

TH I RD QUARTER 1967 18
•
1967 AUDITORIUM -GYM NASIUM, Colorado State University,
Fort Collins, Colorado
Architect: Bunts and Kelsey - Architects

ARCHITECTURAL
AWARDS OF
EXCELLENCE

WASHINGTON & LEE HIGH SCHOO L GYMNA SIUM, Montross, Virginia

Architect: Stevenson Flemer, Eason Cross, Harry Adreon, Associated Architects

•
FOREST HOME BRANCH LIBRARY, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Architect: von Grossmann, Burroughs and Van Lanen, Architects, Inc.

WHITESBORO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL,

Whitesboro, New York
Architect: The Perkins & Will Partnership and Frank C. Delle Cese

lOUTIT HALL OF SCIEN CE, Grand Valley State College,

Allendale, Michigan
Architect: Meathe, Kessler and Associates, Inc.
•
WESTCHESTER TUBERCULOSIS ANO PUBLIC
HEALTH ASSOCIATION OFFICE BUILDING , White Plains, New York
Architect: Joseph A. Roth, AlA

HEALTH SCIENCES INSTRUCTION AND

RESEARCH BUILDING , San Francisco. California
Architect: Reid, Rockwell, Banwell and Taries ,
Architects and Engineers

PARTS DEPOT, FORD MOTOR COMPANY , Richmond , California

Architect: Volkmann & Stockwell

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY BUILDING ,

Dearborn, Michigan
Architect: Skidmore, Owings & Merritl

CARILLON,
Stone Mountain, Georgia
Architect: Robert and Company
Associates

CHARLES F. READ ZONE CENTER BUILDING , Chicago, Illinois

Architect: E. Todd Wheeler and The Perkins & Will Partnership

• ft~I"~."'·I'~'.'~ 1IIIni ~!."IIIIIII~Ij1

.!Jll q . ~,~ liS ~ lJ ~ ~I 1r.~l l 'J. '
- .' ' --/

Esea CORPORATION ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, Portland, Oregon

Architect : Wolff·Zimmer·Gunsul·Frasca
•
........... _-_._-
...;;:;;:..

,
I
i
i ;;-.;;,_._./ i'"

,i
I
i
... _- p•.-...._._.__ i......, __
,
...
..... ,"
\
\
'ko \.
\ i
!
i _.u;:;.;;-.-----------
I

---:J C~~------+!~~----~.J....-.--
_=-
___ ,_-,
.... .~

AISC REGIONAL ENGINEER ING STAFF

•
Pacific Coast Area Southwestern Area Southeastern Area
lOS ANGELES. CAUF 9OO1S DALLAS. TEXAS 75235-6004 Maple Ave. ATLANTA. GA JOlO5--30n Peachlree Rd .• N.E .
714 ~\- OlympIc Blvd Frederick S Adams, Se(llor ReBtOnal Engineer Joseph R Warlick. Ir ReBtOn~1 [ngmeer
ChOirles M Corbtl, 5('nio( Region,' fnl(if'lf."f'f
J.JIm~ W. M;ush, Rt"B,on.JI1 EnSln('t"r-5upt'rvising HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-Cenlury Bldg BIRMINGHAM. ALA 35205--1200 Soulh 20th Street
2120 Trav,s 51 Roberl J SrhaUhau\en, RegIonal Engmeer
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF. 94111--..420 MoIrk.el 51 V Dale l~ne, ReBional Engineer
Howard A,. SchirmN, RegIonal EngIneer CHAR LonE, N c. 28203-PO Box 31B6
1409 £aH Boulevard
OKLAHOMA CITY. OKLA. 73118 R Gene Ellis, Rt'gionai £ng",eer
SEATIlE, WASH 981~lJ07 De1tler Horton Bldg 4412 N WeSlern Avt'
Elmer E. GunnellI!', Sentor Region.JIl Engmeer floyd E. Hensley, Regional Engmeer MEMPHIS. T£NN 38111-Thf' Cenlury Bldg.-
3294 Poplar "'\lenue
Robt'rI W Green , Regional Engineer
Midwestern Area
WASHINGTON, D. C. 200)6....615 171h 51 NW .
CHICAGO, Ill. 60603-176 W . Adams Sf Eastern Central Area John Soule. Scnior Rf'gion~1 [nBmet'r
W,lIilllm T, W.sh,lIrl, SenIor Reg,MOII Engineer
Will,lIIm BlIIugher, ReglOnllli [n,meer ClEVELAND, OHIO 44113-Stand;ud Bldg.
1370 OntaflO SIrH'1 Northeastern Area
DENVER, COLO. 80223-112 Engmeers Bldg.- William C. K~ne , Reglon~1 Englnr.-er
1380 S. SOinlOl Ft" Ofl'llt" BOSTON. MASS. 02108-11 Beacon 51
OOlniel R Dunlap, RegIonal £n8.n('('r COLUMBUS, OHIO 43214-4601 N High St. Frank W. Stockwell, Jr., Regtonal Engineer
Haywud H Dick. Rf'glonalEngmrN
MILWAUKEE, WISC. SJ211......f46S N Chkl.JInd Ave. NEW YORK, N Y 10017-101 Parle Aye
W,II.JIrd H. Harl, 5eOlor Reg,on.' engmeer Roberl J. Bemer, Rt'glonal EnStnc('r-SupervistnB
DETROIT, MICH 48226--980 Penobscot Bldg.-
Frf'd De Falco. Rcogtonal Engmet'r
6fS CflS~old 5.lmuel H Marcus. RC1{lonaIEngmf't'r
MINNEAPOLIS, MINN 5S402-1507 Fosh~y Tower Henry G. leml>eck, Jr ., Regional Engmeer

•
l~'Nrence A. KloIber, ReglOn.1I Englnl'er
Frf'detlck J. Palmer, Rf'gion.' EnBlneer
PHILADElPHIA, PA 19103-1617 John F. K.ennedy Blvd SYRACUSE, N Y. 11203-530 Oak 51
OMAHA. NEB. 68102-C,ly N~rion~1 8~nk Bldg Henry J SIet"'a, Sentor Regioni" Engmeer Donald l. Murdock, Regional EnBineet
J~ck A Donnelly, Regional Engmeer D;JVid T Evans, RegIonal En8met'r
WEST HARTFORD, CONN 06107-The C1~,k Bldg.-
ST. LOUIS, MO. 63105--230 S. Bt'misfon Ave. PITTSBURGH, PA. 1S219-U(llon Trusl Bldg 968 farmington Avenue
Clyde R. Guder, ReBlon~I EnBmeer GabrIel M 8ove, RegIonal Engmeer Ciprian A Pauf(»(), Regional Engineer