Brief - 1: Chapter 15 Leasesbrief Exercises
Brief - 1: Chapter 15 Leasesbrief Exercises
Brief ––1
Because none of the four classification criteria is met, this is an operating lease. Accordingly,
LTT will record rent expense for each of the four $25,000 payments, reducing its earnings by
$100,000 each year.
Because none of the four classification criteria is met, this is an operating lease. Accordingly,
Lakeside will record rent revenue for each of the four $25,000 payments, increasing its earnings by
$100,000 each year. In addition Lakeside, as owner of the asset, will record depreciation. Assuming
straight-line depreciation of the $2 million cost over the 25-year life, that’s $80,000 depreciation
expense each year. So, earnings are increased by a net $20,000 ($100,000 – 80,000).
Because this is an operating lease, Ward will record rent expense for each of the $5,000
payments. The advance payment also represents rent, recorded initially as prepaid rent and allocated
equally over the 10 years of the lease. As a result, Ward’s rent expense for the year reduces its
earnings by $70,000 each year.
$5,000 x 12 = $60,000
$100,000 ÷ 10 = 10,000
$70,000
The lease is a capital lease to Athens because the present value of the minimum lease payments
($20.4 million) is greater than 90% of the fair value of the asset (90% x $22.4 million = $20.16
million). None of the other three classification criteria is met.
The present value of the minimum lease payments ($20.4 million) is greater than 90% of the fair
value of the asset (90% x $22.4 million = $20.16 million). Since the additional lessor conditions
also are met, it is a capital lease to Corinth. Furthermore, it is a sales-type lease because the present
value of the minimum lease payments exceeds the lessor’s cost ($16 million).
In direct financing leases, the lessor records a receivable for the present value of the lease
payments to be received ($1,486,000 for Sonic). The difference between the total of the lease
payments ($1,982,000 for Sonic) and the present value of the lease payments to be received over the
term of the lease represents interest. Over the term of the leases, Sonic will report this amount
($1,982,000 – 1,486,000 = $496,000) as interest revenue, determined as the effective interest rate
times the outstanding balance (net investment) each period.
The amount of interest expense the lessee would record in conjunction with the second
quarterly payment at October 1 is $2,892:
Oct. 1
Interest expense (2% x [$150,000 – 5,376]).................... 2,892
Lease payable (difference)............................................... 2,484
Cash (lease payment).................................................. 5,376
The amount of interest revenue the lessor would record in conjunction with the second
$26,269 x 5.32948 =
$140,000
(rounded)
Present value of an annuity due of $1: n = 6, i = 5%
The liability for interest on the lease liability in the balance sheet will be $5,687:
The price at which the lessor is “selling” the asset being leased is the present value of the lease
payments:
Under U.S. GAAP, this would not be a capital lease because none of the four classification
criteria is met. The lease term is less than 75% of the economic life of the asset, and the present
value of the minimum lease payments is less than 90% of the asset’s fair value. We don’t have these
“bright line” rules under IFRS. If the term of the lease constitutes a “major portion” of the useful
life of an asset a finance lease normally is indicated. Is 73% (8/11) a major portion? Perhaps so.
This is a matter of professional judgment, which may differ depending on the presence or absence of
other indicators that the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the lessee.
Another situation that normally indicates a finance lease is if the present value of the minimum
lease payments is equal to or greater than substantially all of the fair value of the asset. Is 89%
(40/45) a major portion? Perhaps so. This also is a matter of professional judgment. When we
consider this and the previous indicator in combination, it’s very likely the conclusion would be that
the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the lessee and this would be considered
a finance (capital) lease.
Exercises
Exercise 15–1
January 1, 2013
Leased equipment (calculated above).............................. 112,080
Lease payable (calculated above)................................ 112,080
April 1, 2013
Interest expense (2% x [$112,080 – 15,000]).................. 1,942
Lease payable (difference)............................................... 13,058
Cash (lease payment).................................................. 15,000
July 1, 2013
Interest expense (2% x $84,022: from schedule)............. 1,680
Lease payable (difference)............................................... 13,320
Cash (lease payment).................................................. 15,000
October 1, 2013
Interest expense (2% x $70,702: from schedule)............. 1,414
Lease payable (difference)............................................... 13,586
Cash (lease payment).................................................. 15,000
January 1, 2014
Interest payable (from adjusting entry)............................ 1,142
Lease payable (difference)............................................... 13,858
Cash (lease payment).................................................. 15,000
Requirement 2
$562,907 x 5.32948 =
$3,000,000
(rounded)
Present value of an annuity due of $1: n = 6, i = 5%
Calculations:
Requirement 1
a. Transfer of ownership is one of four criteria, any of which is sufficient to qualify this as a
capital lease.
b. A bargain purchase option is one of four criteria, any of which is sufficient to qualify this as a
capital lease because, by definition, ownership is expected to transfer.
c. Whether the term of the lease constitutes 75% of the useful life of an asset is one of four
criteria, any of which is sufficient to qualify this as a capital lease. 70% (14/20) does not meet
this criterion.
d. Whether the present value of the minimum lease payments is equal to or greater than 90% of
the fair value of the asset is one of four criteria, any of which is sufficient to qualify this as a
capital lease. 89% (8.9 ÷ 10) does not meet this criterion.
e. If the leased asset is of a specialized nature such that only the lessee can use it without major
modifications being made, that normally would suggest that one of the four classification
criteria might be met. But, this, by itself, is not a specified criterion under U.S. GAAP for a
lease to be classified as a capital lease.
Requirement 2
a. Transfer of ownership normally is an indicator of a finance lease.
b. A bargain purchase option normally is an indicator of a finance lease because, by definition,
ownership is expected to transfer.
c. If the term of the lease constitutes a “major portion” of the useful life of an asset a finance
lease normally is indicated. Is 70% (14 ÷ 20) a major portion? Perhaps so. This is a matter of
professional judgment, which may differ depending on the presence or absence of other
indicators that the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the lessee.
d. One situation that normally indicates a finance lease is if the present value of the minimum
lease payments is equal to or greater than substantially all of the fair value of the asset. Is 89%
(8.9 ÷ 10) a major portion? Perhaps so. This is a matter of professional judgment, which may
differ depending on the presence or absence of other indicators that the risks and rewards of
ownership have been transferred to the lessee.
e. One situation that normally indicates a finance lease is if the leased asset is of a specialized
nature such that only the lessee can use it without major modifications being made. Could
another airline use the aircraft without modification or with nonmajor modification? That
information is not specified. With additional information, this is a matter of professional
judgment, which may differ depending on the presence or absence of other indicators that the
risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the lessee.
Situation 2
(a) $980,000 ÷ 9.95011** = $98,491
fair lease
value payments
** Present value of an annuity due of $1: n = 20, i = 9%
Situation 3
(a) $185,000 ÷ 3.40183** = $54,382
fair lease
value payments
** Present value of an annuity due of $1: n = 4, i = 12%
But since this amount exceeds the asset’s fair value, the lessee
must capitalize the $185,000 fair value instead.
1. January 1, 2013
Lease receivable (fair value / present value)................................. 500,000
Inventory of equipment (lessor’s cost)..................................... 500,000
The initial direct costs increase the net investment: $500,000 + 4,242. The new effective
rate is the discount rate that equates the net investment and the future lease payments:
$504,242 ÷ ? **
$184,330
lessor’s lease
net investment payments
** Present value of an annuity due of $1: n = 3, i = ?%
When you consult the present value table for an annuity due, you search row 3 (n = 3) for
this value and find it in the 10% column. So, the effective interest rate is 10%. The net
investment is amortized at the new rate.
Requirement 1
Requirement 2
$172,501: [$192,501 – 20,000] (present value of minimum lease payments or initial lease
balance minus first payment)
2. Leased asset
20 years
$35,000
Requirement 1
Since the present value of minimum lease payments (same for both the lessor and the lessee) is
greater than 90% of the fair value of the asset, the 90% recovery criterion is met.
The 75% of useful life criterion is met also. Both additional lessor conditions are met for a
capital lease. There is no dealer’s profit because the fair value equals the lessor’s cost.
Requirement 2
April 1, 2013
Interest expense (3% x [$2 million – 130,516])............................ 56,085
Lease payable (difference)............................................................. 74,431
Cash (lease payment)................................................................ 130,516
April 1, 2013
Cash (lease payment)............................................................. 130,516
Lease receivable (difference)............................................ 74,431
Interest revenue (3% x [$2 million – 130,516])................ 56,085
Requirement 3
April 1, 2013
Cash (lease payment)..................................................................... 130,516
Lease receivable (difference).................................................... 74,431
Interest revenue (3% x [$2 million – 130,516])........................ 56,085
Problem 15–12
Situation
1 2 3 4
A. The lessor’s:
1. Minimum lease payments1 $40,000 $44,000 $44,000 $40,000
1 ($10,000 x number of payments) + residual value guaranteed by lessee and/or by third party.
2 Minimum lease payments plus unguaranteed residual value.
3 Present value of gross investment.
4 ($10,000 x number of payments) + residual value guaranteed by lessee.
5 Present value of minimum lease payments; should not exceed fair value.
6 Present value of minimum lease payments; should not exceed fair value.