Scribd
Upload
100 views

2.the Lagrangian For Electromagnetic Fields

1) The document discusses deriving the Lagrangian for electromagnetic fields. 2) It explains that the only reasonable choice for the Lagrangian is the field tensor minus its dual, as this is a scalar and conserves parity. 3) The Lagrangian for classical electromagnetism that is proposed and shown to derive Maxwell's equations is the field tensor minus its dual plus an interaction term involving the 4-current density.

Uploaded by

Mizanur Rahman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100 views

2.the Lagrangian For Electromagnetic Fields

1) The document discusses deriving the Lagrangian for electromagnetic fields. 2) It explains that the only reasonable choice for the Lagrangian is the field tensor minus its dual, as this is a scalar and conserves parity. 3) The Lagrangian for classical electromagnetism that is proposed and shown to derive Maxwell's equations is the field tensor minus its dual plus an interaction term involving the 4-current density.

Uploaded by

Mizanur Rahman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

2/17/2020 The Lagrangian for Electromagnetic Fields

Next: Gauge Invariance can Simplify Up: Classical Maxwell Fields Previous: The Electromagnetic Field Tensor Contents

The Lagrangian for Electromagnetic Fields


There are not many ways to make a scalar Lagrangian from the field tensor. We already know that

and we need to make our Lagrangian out of the fields, not just the current. Again, cannot appear explicitly because that violates symmetries of nature. Also

we want a linear equation and so higher powers of the field should not occur. A term of the form is a mass term and would cause fields to fall off

faster than . So, the only reasonable choice is

One might consider

but that is a pseudo-scalar, not a scalar. That is, it changes sign under a parity transformation. The EM interaction is known to conserve parity so this is not a real
option. As with the scalar field, we need to add an interaction with a source term. Of course, we know electromagnetism well, so finding the right Lagrangian is

not really guess work. The source of the field is the vector , so the simple scalar we can write is .

The Lagrangian for Classical Electricity and Magnetism we will try is.

In working with this Lagrangian, we will treat each component of as an independent field.

The next step is to check what the Euler-Lagrange equation gives us.

https://quantummechanics.ucsd.edu/ph130a/130_notes/node452.html 1/4
2/17/2020 The Lagrangian for Electromagnetic Fields

Note that, since we have four independent components of as independent fields, we have four equations; or one 4-vector equation. The Euler-Lagrange

equation gets us back Maxwell's equation with this choice of the Lagrangian. This clearly justifies the choice of .

It is important to emphasize that we have a Lagrangian based, formal classical field theory for electricity and magnetism which has the four components of the 4-

vector potential as the independent fields.We could not treat each component of as independent since they are clearly correlated. We could have tried

using the six independent components of the antisymmetric tensor but it would not have given the right answer. Using the 4-vector potentials as the fields does give

the right answer. Electricity and Magnetism is a theory of a 4-vector field .

We can also calculate the free field Hamiltonian density, that is, the Hamiltonian density in regions with no source term. We use the standard definition of the
Hamiltonian in terms of the Lagrangian.

We just calculated above that

which we can use to get

https://quantummechanics.ucsd.edu/ph130a/130_notes/node452.html 2/4
2/17/2020 The Lagrangian for Electromagnetic Fields

We will use this once we have written the radiation field in a convenient form. In the meantime, we can check what this gives us in general in a region with no
sources.

If we integrate the last term by parts, (and the fields fall to zero at infinity), then that term contains a which is zero with no sources in the region. We can therefore drop it and are left
with

This is the result we expected, the energy density and an EM field. (Remember the fields have been decreased by a factor of compared to CGS units.)

We will study the interaction between electrons and the electromagnetic field with the Dirac equation. Until then, the Hamiltonian used for non-relativistic quantum
mechanics will be sufficient. We have derived the Lorentz force law from that Hamiltonian.

https://quantummechanics.ucsd.edu/ph130a/130_notes/node452.html 3/4
2/17/2020 The Lagrangian for Electromagnetic Fields

Next: Gauge Invariance can Simplify Up: Classical Maxwell Fields Previous: The Electromagnetic Field Tensor Contents
Jim Branson 2013-04-22

https://quantummechanics.ucsd.edu/ph130a/130_notes/node452.html 4/4

You might also like