Scribd
Upload
2K views

Letter of Request To The Validators

Two senior high school students are conducting a research project on the stress levels of engineering students and their coping mechanisms. They have written letters requesting validation of their questionnaire from three experts - a teacher, librarian, and college instructor at their school. The letters introduce the research topic and purpose of the validation, and thank the recipients in advance.

Uploaded by

Trisha Falalimpa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2K views

Letter of Request To The Validators

Two senior high school students are conducting a research project on the stress levels of engineering students and their coping mechanisms. They have written letters requesting validation of their questionnaire from three experts - a teacher, librarian, and college instructor at their school. The letters introduce the research topic and purpose of the validation, and thank the recipients in advance.

Uploaded by

Trisha Falalimpa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Letter of request to the Validators

RAMON MAGSAYSAY MEMORIAL COLLEGES


Senior High School Department
General Santos City

November 21, 2019


Mrs Rosalinda M. Vedeja, MAED
Teacher
Ramon Magsaysay Memorial Colleges
General Santos City

Ma’am:

Greetings!

We, the undersigned Senior High School students from Grade 12 – Science,
Technology, Engineering and Mathematics are currently conducting our research
entitled STRESS LEVEL OF ENGINEERING STUDENTS AND THEIR COPING
MECHANISM.

In connection with this, we are requesting for your expertise to validate our
questionnaire.

Thank you and God bless!

Very truly yours,

PRECIOUS JAIME F. GUEVARRA

REYNALDO VIDAL JR

Researchers

Noted by:

ARCELI P. NAVAL, MA

Research Adviser
Letter of request to the Validators
RAMON MAGSAYSAY MEMORIAL COLLEGES
Senior High School Department
General Santos City

November 21, 2019


Mrs Salome N. Rocacurva, MA
Director Librarian
Ramon Magsaysay Memorial Colleges
General Santos City

Ma’am:

Greetings!

We, the undersigned Senior High School students from Grade 12 – Science,
Technology, Engineering and Mathematics are currently conducting our research
entitled STRESS LEVEL OF ENGINEERING STUDENTS AND THEIR COPING
MECHANISM.

In connection with this, we are requesting for your expertise to validate our
questionnaire.

Thank you and God bless!

Very truly yours,

PRECIOUS JAIME F. GUEVARRA

REYNALDO VIDAL JR

Researchers

Noted by:

ARCELI P. NAVAL, MA

Research Adviser
Letter of request to the Validators
RAMON MAGSAYSAY MEMORIAL COLLEGES
Senior High School Department
General Santos City

November 21, 2019


Engr. Elsa J. Fernandez
College Instructor
Ramon Magsaysay Memorial Colleges
General Santos City
Ma’am:
Greetings!
We, the undersigned Senior High School students from Grade 12 – Science,
Technology, Engineering and Mathematics are currently conducting our research
entitled STRESS LEVEL OF ENGINEERING STUDENTS AND THEIR COPING
MECHANISM.
In connection with this, we are requesting for your expertise to validate our
questionnaire.
Thank you and God bless!

Very truly yours,

PRECIOUS JAIME F. GUEVARRA


REYNALDO VIDAL JR
Researchers

Noted by:

ARCELI P. NAVAL, MA
Research Adviser
Letter of Request to the Registrar
RAMON MAGSAYSAY MEMORIAL COLLEGES
Senior High School Department
General Santos City

November 21, 2019


Ms Emy Bibabcao
School Registrar
Ramon Magsaysay Memorial Colleges
General Santos City
Ma’am:
Greetings!
We, the undersigned Senior High School students from Grade 12 – Science,
Technology, Engineering and Mathematics are currently conducting our research
entitled STRESS LEVEL OF ENGINEERING STUDENTS AND THEIR COPING
MECHANISM.
In connection with this, we are requesting to get the total population of Civil Engineering
from first year level to fifth year level and are enrolled in the school year 2018-2019.
Thank you and God bless!

Very truly yours,

PRECIOUS JAIME F. GUEVARRA


REYNALDO VIDAL JR
Researchers

Noted by:

ARCELI P. NAVAL, MA
Research Adviser
VALIDATION RATING SHEET

OF EXPERT VALIDATORS

For Evaluator: Please check the appropriate box for your rating.

Point Equivalent: 5-Excellent

4-Very Good

3-Good

2-Fair

1-Poor

Criteria 5 4 3 2 1
1. Clarity of directions and items. The vocabulary level,
language structure and conceptual level of respondents.
The test directions and items are written in clear and
understandable manner.
2. Presentation/organization of the items. The items are
presented and organized in logical manner.
3. Suitability of items. The manner of items appropriately
represented the substance of the research. The questions
are designed to determine the conditions, knowledge,
perception and attitudes that are supposed to be
measured.
4. Adequateness items per category. The items represented
the coverage of the research and respectively enough of
the question needed of the research.
5. Attainment of the purpose. The instrument as a whole
fulfils the objectives of which was constructed.
6. Each item question requires only specific answer and no
aspect of questionnaire suggest bias of the researcher.
7. Scale and evaluation system. Scale adapted is appropriate
for items.

Engr. Elsa J. Fernandez


NAME OF EVALUATOR
VALIDATION RATING SHEET

OF EXPERT VALIDATORS

For Evaluator: Please check the appropriate box for your rating.

Point Equivalent: 5-Excellent

4-Very Good

3-Good

2-Fair

1-Poor

Criteria 5 4 3 2 1
1. Clarity of directions and items. The vocabulary level,
language structure and conceptual level of respondents.
The test directions and items are written in clear and
understandable manner.
2. Presentation/organization of the items. The items are
presented and organized in logical manner.
3. Suitability of items. The manner of items appropriately
represented the substance of the research. The questions
are designed to determine the conditions, knowledge,
perception and attitudes that are supposed to be
measured.
4. Adequateness items per category. The items represented
the coverage of the research and respectively enough of
the question needed of the research.
5. Attainment of the purpose. The instrument as a whole
fulfils the objectives of which was constructed.
6. Each item question requires only specific answer and no
aspect of questionnaire suggest bias of the researcher.
7. Scale and evaluation system. Scale adapted is appropriate
for items.

Salome N. Rocacurva, MA
NAME OF EVALUATOR
VALIDATION RATING SHEET

OF EXPERT VALIDATORS

For Evaluator: Please check the appropriate box for your rating.

Point Equivalent: 5-Excellent

4-Very Good

3-Good

2-Fair

1-Poor

Criteria 5 4 3 2 1
1. Clarity of directions and items. The vocabulary level,
language structure and conceptual level of respondents.
The test directions and items are written in clear and
understandable manner.
2. Presentation/organization of the items. The items are
presented and organized in logical manner.
3. Suitability of items. The manner of items appropriately
represented the substance of the research. The questions
are designed to determine the conditions, knowledge,
perception and attitudes that are supposed to be
measured.
4. Adequateness items per category. The items represented
the coverage of the research and respectively enough of
the question needed of the research.
5. Attainment of the purpose. The instrument as a whole
fulfils the objectives of which was constructed.
6. Each item question requires only specific answer and no
aspect of questionnaire suggest bias of the researcher.
7. Scale and evaluation system. Scale adapted is appropriate
for items.

Rosalinda M. Vedeja, MAED


NAME OF EVALUATOR

You might also like