MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Knowledge of content within and (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services and across curriculum inter-observer agreement
Pedagogy teaching areas. form about knowledge of
content within and across
curriculum teaching areas
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
developed highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
3. Instructional materials Efficiency
highlighting mastery of
content and its integration in
other subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used a range of 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education teaching strategies (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services that enhance learner inter-observer agreement
achievement in form about teaching
literacy and numeracy strategies that enhance
skills. learner achievement in
literacy and numeracy skills
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
used in teaching highlighting
learner-centered strategies
that promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills
3. Instructional materials
highlighting learner-centered Efficiency
strategies that promote
literacy and/or numeracy
skills
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in teaching
5. Results of assessment used
in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range of 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education teaching strategies to (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services develop critical and inter-observer agreement
creative thinking, as form about teaching
well as other higher- strategies to develop critical
order thinking skills. and creative thinking, as
well as other higher-order
thinking skills
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
used in teaching highlighting
different teaching strategies
that develop critical and
creative thinking and/or
other HOTS
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
3. Instructional materials Efficiency
highlighting different
teaching strategies that
develop critical and creative
thinking and/or other HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used
in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Environment classroom structure (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services and Diversity to engage learners, inter-observer agreement
of Learners individually or in form about managing
groups, in meaningful classroom structure that
exploration, discovery engages learners in various
and hands-on activities
activities within a 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs Efficiency
range of physical highlighting various
learning classroom management
environments. strategies that engage
learners in activities/tasks in
different physical learning
environments
3. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed learner Classroom observation tool Quality
Education behavior (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services constructively by observer agreement form about
applying positive and teacher management of learner
non-violent discipline behavior using the following
to ensure learning- strategies:
focused 1. Providing motivation
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
environments. 2. Praising the learners/Giving Efficiency
positive feedback
3. Setting house
rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learners’ active
participation
5. Allowing learners to express
their ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities
to learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask
questions
8. Others (Please specify and Timeliness
provide annotations)
Basic 6. Used differentiated, 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education developmentally (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services appropriate learning inter-observer agreement
experiences to form about using
address learners’ differentiated,
gender, needs, developmentally appropriate
strengths, interests learning experiences
and experiences. 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
developed highlighting
differentiation in content,
product, process, learning Efficiency
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
3. Instructional materials
developed highlighting
differentiation in content,
product, process, learning
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
4. Others (Please specify and
Timeliness
provide annotations)
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education and Planning and implemented (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services developmentally inter-observer agreement
sequenced teaching form about using
and learning developmentally sequenced
processes to meet teaching and learning
curriculum process
requirements and 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
varied teaching highlighting
contexts. developmentally sequenced
instruction that meet
curriculum goals and varied Efficiency
teaching contexts
3. Instructional materials used
to implement
developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning
process to meet curriculum
requirements and varied
teaching contexts
4. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Personal notes of teachers Quality
collegial discussions on LACs/FGDs/meetings
that use teacher and with proof of attendance
learner feedback to 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD
enrich teaching sessions on use of teacher
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
practice. and learner feedback to Efficiency
enrich teaching practice with
proof of attendance
3. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education developed, organized (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services and used appropriate inter-observer agreement
teaching and learning form about using appropriate
resources, including teaching and learning
ICT, to address resources, including ICT
learning goals. Examples:
 Activity sheets/task
sheets/work sheets Efficiency
 PowerPoint presentations
 Video clips
 Module
 SIMs-Strategic
Intervention Materials
 Others
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
with appropriate instructional
materials appended
3. Others (Please specify and Timeliness
provide annotations)
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Assessment selected, organized (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services and and used diagnostic, inter-observer agreement
Reporting formative and form about using diagnostic,
summative formative and summative
assessment assessment strategies
strategies consistent 2. Prepared lesson
with curriculum plans/modified DLLs
requirements. highlighting appropriate use
of formative assessment
strategies
3. Developed diagnostic tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
4. Developed summative tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
Efficiency
5. Developed performance
tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample accomplished
rubrics
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 11. Monitored and 1. Compilation of a learner’s Quality
Education evaluated learner written work with summary
Services progress and of results and with signature
achievement using of parents
learner attainment 2. Formative/summative
data. assessment tools with TOS
and frequency of errors with Efficiency
identified least mastered
skills
3. Class records/grading
sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
showing index of mastery
Timeliness
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Basic 12. Communicated 1. At least 3 samples of Quality
Education promptly and clearly corrected test papers of the
Services the learners’ needs, same 3 learners in the same
progress and learning area with parents’ or
achievement to key guardians’ signature and
stakeholders, date of receipt
including
2. Minutes of PTA meetings or
parents/guardians.
Parent-Teacher conferences
in all quarters with proof of Efficiency
parent’s/guardian’s
attendance
3. Report cards with parent’s or
guardian’s signature in all
quarters supported by
minutes of meeting
4. Communication with
parents/guardians using
various modalities
Timeliness
5. Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
6. Other documents showing
learner needs, progress and
achievement submitted to
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
other stakeholders

Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed 10% 1. Certificate of Recognition or Quality

Education various related Participation
Services works/activities that 2. Certificate of Training
contribute to the 3. Certificate of Speakership
teaching-learning 4. Committee involvement
process. 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular
activities
6. Book or Journal Efficiency
Authorship/Co-
authorship/Contributorship
7. Coordinatorship/Chairperson
ship
8. Coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers
10. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Timeliness

Rater Ratee Approving Authority