Truss Analysis and Design
Truss Analysis and Design
DESIGN
ANALYSIS OF TRUSS surface of the roof, respectively. Same
applies to acting forces on truss Weight of Sag rods, WS
I - DESIGN DATA: members, i.e., plus for tension and For sag rods and tie rods with
minus for compression. diameter of 16 mm, w = 1.5 psf =
Length of top chord, Ltc =√12 + 32 = 3.1623 m 7.3236 kg/m2
III – MATERIALS PROPERTIES WS = w x 9.81 N/kg
Roof Live Load, Lr = 0.75 KPa
WS =7.3236 kg/m2 (9.81 N/kg)
For truss members:
Spacing of top chord joints, Stc = 1/cos WS = 71.8445 N/m2 or Pa
(18.435) = 1.0541 m Material: Single angles and Gusset
plates conforming to ASTM A36 Weight of Truss (self-weight), WT
Spacing of Truss, LB = 3.5 m (maximum) Using Fuller’s formula (in psf)
Fu = 400 MPa ; Fy = 248 MPa ; W = 0.4 + 0.04 LT
Span of Truss, LT = 6 m E = 200,000 MPa LT = 6 m = 19.685 ft
W = 0.4 + 0.04 (19.685) =
IV – SOLVING FOR ROOF DEAD LOAD, D 1.1874 psf = 5.7974 kg/m2
II – DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS WT = w x 9.81 N/kg = 5.7974 (9.81)
Weight of Roof Covering, WR
WT = 56.8725 Pa
Using Gauge no. 26 (Metal Roof
1. The trusses in this project are designed
Tiles) with w = 3.545 kg/m2
as simply supported. Weight of Bracing System, WB
WR = w x 9.81 N/kg
2. Reactions at supports are computed In general, the weight of bracing
WR =3.545 kg/m2 (9.81N/kg)
using the Three Equations of system is assumed to be equivalent
WR =34.97265 Pa
Equilibrium since the trusses are to 1psf = 47.8959 Pa. (Theory of
Weight of Purlins, WP
simply supported. Structures by Kassimali)
C3x4.1 - A36 steel section with w =
3. Member forces of truss are obtained WB = 47.8959 Pa
6.14 kg/m
using the Maxwell Diagram.
WP =(w x 9.81 N/kg)/LB
4. Load combinations are determined Weight of Ceiling with Insulation,
WP = (6.14 kg/m (9.81 N/kg))/3.5
using LRFD method. Wc
m
5. Plus and minus signs signify pressure Acoustical fiber = 0.05 KPa
WP =17.2095 Pa
acting towards and away from the
Suspended steel channel system PANEL LOAD ON BOTTOM CHORD, LBC R1(6) = 4494.9822 N.m + 7491.637 N.m +
= 0.10 KPa (from table 204-2, NSCP 5993.3096 N.m + 4494.9822 N.m + 2996.6548
2010) LBC = Wc (TAHS) = 190 Pa (3.5 m^2) = 665 N.m +1498.3274 N.m
Using rigid insulation with w = N
𝟐𝟔,𝟗𝟔𝟗.𝟖𝟗𝟑𝟐 𝐍.𝐦
0.04 KPa R1 = = 4494.9822 N
DEAD LOAD: 𝟔𝐦
Wc = 50 Pa + 100 Pa + 40 Wc =
190 Pa (Upward to be positive) ∑ 𝐹𝑣 = 0
TARS = AB x LB = 1.0541m (3.5m) = 3.6893 INTERNAL FORCES FOR DEAD LOADS ARE
m^2 OBTAINED USING THE MAXWELL DIAGRAM
WINDWARD:
LEEWARD: R1 = 6326.8251 N
N
TRUSS MAXWEL INTERNAL NATUR FKJ 4-F 10,773.105 T
L FORCES E 4N FOR LEEWARD:
MEMBE
R DIAGRAM FJD 5-6 3,078.0553 T
N
FAB B-1 14,600.353 C
8N FDE E-6 7,300.2537 C
N
FAL 1-F 15,390.144 T
0N FJE 6-7 0 ---
or (Fe ≥ 0.44 Fy) MAXIMUM ACTUAL COMPRESSIVE AND A36 Steel with Fy = 248 MPa;
TENSILE LOAD (As obtained from LRFD load
𝐅𝐲
𝐅𝐜𝐫 = [𝟎. 𝟔𝟓𝟖𝐅𝐞 ]𝐅𝐲 (eq. 505.3-2) combinations) E = 200,000 MPa; Ag = 235 mm2 ;
248
E
4.71√Fy = 4.71 √
200,000 MPa
= 133.755 Properties:
Fcr = [0.658 616.644 ] (248 MPa) = 209.578 248 MPa
A36 Steel with Fy = 248 MPa;
E = 200,000 MPa; Ag = 112 mm2
Pn = Fcr Ag = 209.578 (235) = 49,250.83 KL/r < 4.71√Fy
E
(condition 1)
510. DESIGN OF CONNECTION OF TRUSS Strength of Elements in Shear Fv = 0.3Fu = 0.3(400) = 120 MPa
MEMBERS A. Based on shear yielding on base
metal: C. Based on tensile rupture on weld
Design Strength of Fillet Weld For ∅Pn = ∅(0.6) Fy Ag (510.4-3) metal:
Where: ∅ = 1.00 (LRFD)
The design strength, ∅Rn of welded joints is For ∅Pn = ∅(0.6) FEXX Ae
Fv = 0.4Fy = 0.4(248) = 99.2MPa
the lower value of the base material strength
B. Based on shear rupture on base
determined according to the limit states of Where: ∅ = 0.75 (LRFD)
metal:
shear yielding and rupture, and the weld metal
For ∅Pn = ∅(0.6) Fu Ae (510.4-4) Fv = 0.3FEXX = 0.3(415) = 124.5MPa
strength determined according to the limit
Where: ∅ = 0.75 (LRFD)
state of rupture.
∴ Allowable shear based on shear capacity B. Maximum weld size based on weld
is controlled by yielding on base metal. metal: try 5mm-thick gusset plate: w =
5mm
Pu = LwFv
𝑃𝑢 33622.6294 𝑁
L = 𝑤(𝐹𝑣) = (4.76𝑚𝑚)(99.2 𝑀𝑃𝑎)
L = 71.2054mm
CONNECTION OF TOP CHORD MEMBERS
For Balanced Condition,
Pu = 33,622.6294 N
L1Y1 = L2Y2
Design data: L1 (10.73mm) = L2 (40 – 10.73)
NOTE: As obtained from the LRFD FEXX = 415 MPa (Electrode classification L1 (10.73) – L2 (29.27) = 0, eq. 1
Load Combinations, regardless of number, E60xx)
nature, maximum bar force shall L40x40x3 L1 + L2 = L
be used in the design of t= 3mm L1 + L2 = 71.2054, eq. 2
connection in each member. Y1 = 10.73 mm
Solving simultaneously,
Size of weld, w: L1 = 52.1045 say 55 mm
A. Maximum weld size based on base L2 = 19.1008 say 20 mm
metal: t = 3mm < 6mm
Use w = 3 mm Checking block shear strength,
Y1 = 8.35 mm
Pn = 0.6FuAnv + UbsFuAnt ≤ 0.6FyAgv + Solving simultaneously,
UbsFuAnt (eq. 510.4-5) Size of weld, w: L1 = 48.382 say 50 mm
A. Maximum weld size based on base L2 = 18.659 say 20 mm
∅Pn > Pu metal: t = 3mm < 6mm
Where: Use w = 3 mm
∅ = 0.75 B. Maximum weld size based on weld
Agv = gross area subject to shear, mm2 metal: try 5mm-thick gusset plate: w =
Ant = net area subject to tension, mm2 5mm
Anv = net area subject to shear, mm2
Ubs = 1.0, where the tension stress is uniform ∴ for equal-leg fillet weld, use w = 4.76mm
(largest size that can be made in single pass).
Pn = 0.6 (400)(71.2054)(3) + 1.0(400)(40)(3)
Pn = 99,267.888 Required Weld Length, L
∅Pn = 0.75(99,267.888) Since base metal controls with Fv = 99.2 MPa
= 74,450.916 > Pu=33,622.6294 N
Pu = LwFv
∴ The weld metal is safe against block shear! 𝑃𝑢 31656.404 𝑁 Checking block shear strength,
L = 𝑤(𝐹𝑣) = (4.76𝑚𝑚)(99.2 𝑀𝑃𝑎)
L = 67.0414mm Pn = 0.6FuAnv + UbsFuAnt ≤ 0.6FyAgv +
CONNECTION OF BOTTOM CHORD
MEMBERS UbsFuAnt (eq. 510.4-5)
For Balanced Condition,
L1Y1 = L2Y2
∴ The weld metal is safe against block shear!
L1 (5.98mm) = L2 (20 – 5.98)
L1 (5.98) – L2 (14.02) = 0, eq. 1
L1 + L2 = L
L1 + L2 = 18.3203mm, eq. 2
Solving simultaneously,
L1 = 12.8425 say 15 mm
L2 = 5.4777 say 10 mm