Scribd
Upload
82 views

Volkschel Labor Union Vs NLRC

This case involves a labor dispute between a union and company. The union filed a complaint against the company for unfair labor practices. An arbitrator ruled in favor of the union and ordered the company to reinstate employees with backpay. The company appealed the arbitrator's award to the National Labor Relations Commission. The issue is whether the NLRC has the power to modify the arbitrator's award, which was made final under the collective bargaining agreement. The Court held that the NLRC does have the power to modify the award because the CBA's appeal provision is subordinate to law, which allows for appeals in this case. However, the NLRC could not consider the company's appeal because it was not filed within the required timeframe

Uploaded by

Crizedhen Vardeleon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
82 views

Volkschel Labor Union Vs NLRC

This case involves a labor dispute between a union and company. The union filed a complaint against the company for unfair labor practices. An arbitrator ruled in favor of the union and ordered the company to reinstate employees with backpay. The company appealed the arbitrator's award to the National Labor Relations Commission. The issue is whether the NLRC has the power to modify the arbitrator's award, which was made final under the collective bargaining agreement. The Court held that the NLRC does have the power to modify the award because the CBA's appeal provision is subordinate to law, which allows for appeals in this case. However, the NLRC could not consider the company's appeal because it was not filed within the required timeframe

Uploaded by

Crizedhen Vardeleon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Labor Law> Labor Relations> Nature of Office and Function

VOLKSCHEL LABOR UNION


vs
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION
G.R. No.L-39686, June 25,1980
(First Division)

DOCTRINE: It is a well-settled rule that an award or judgment becomes final and executory upon the
expiration of the period to appeal and no appeal was made within the reglementary period.

FACTS: The case arose from the complaint for unfair labor practice filed on March 15, 1973 by petitioner
against respondent company on the following grounds:

1. Unjust transfers and suspension of unionists.


2. Gross violation of the collective bargaining agreement, party particularly re: agency clause.
3. Refusal to negotiate union grievances in good faith

Pending resolution of the complaint, the company reinstated Godofredo League and Edilberto Vicmudo
while petitioners Suarez, Ramos, Torres and Galan were dismissed for insubordination. After a series of
hearings and submission of the parties' respective memoranda, the arbitrator rendered an award4 on
February 1, 1974, the dispositive portion of which reads:

WHEREFORE, and in recapitulation, the respondent company is hereby directed to reinstate Mariano
Suarez, Jaime Ramos, Pedro Torres and Antonio Galan to their usual employment with full backwages
from January 9, 1973 and to pay backwages to Godofredo League and Edilberto Vicmudo corresponding
to the period of their unjust suspension and/or lay-off from January to February, 1973.......

From this award, respondent company appealed to the National Labor Commission

ISSUE: Whether or not the NLRC has the power to alter or modify the award by a voluntary arbitrator
whose decision is final and executory pursuant to the CBA

HELD: Yes
Section 2.Appeal may be brought to the Commission on within ten (10) days upon receipt of the Award by
the aggrieved party.

It was stressed by said respondent that the provision in the collective bargaining agreement is
subordinate to the will of the state or the law; that is to say, if appeal is provided for or available under the
law, said remedy cannot be foreclosed by mere stipulation of the parties.

Arbitrator Alexander Guray stated in his award that the parties had earlier sought to settle their
differences internally pursuant to the grievance machinery provided in their agreement;

The designation of Guray was thus as "Compulsory Arbitrator," and the proceedings accordingly were
actually that of compulsory arbitration with the right of appeal. However, because of respondent
company's failure to perfect its appeal on time, the National Labor Relations Commission was divested of
its jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

You might also like