Carl Bovill
Carl Bovill
1. Introduction
Fractal geometry is the formal study of self-similar structures and is at the conceptual core
of understanding nature’s complexity. The fractal dimension provides a measure of the com-
plexity of a structure. It is a measure of the mixture of order and surprise in a structure. The
measured dimension and the box counting dimension methods provide procedures that can
determine the fractal dimension of natural shapes like coast lines or mountain ridges and man
made shapes like Frank Lloyd Wright’s stained glass windows. Natural rhythms in time are
also fractal. Range analysis provides a method of quantifying the fractal dimension of these
rhythms. Midpoint displacement methods provide procedures for generating fractal rhythms
that can be used to set up complex rhythms in a building design that echo the complexity of
nature. Musical rhythms provide easy access to fractal rhythms if a computer is not available.
Curdling provides a method of generating fractal fields in two and three dimensions. Iter-
ated function systems provide a means of generating an unlimited diversity of fractal shapes.
None of these methods are difficult to use and they provide the designer with the power to
get beyond the superficial to a deeper expression and exploration of the cosmic complexity
that contemporary science is disclosing.
The measured dimension method can only be used in the case where the irregularities to
be measured are in the form of a continuous line like a coastline. When one would like to
include offshore islands in the calculation or do a calculation of the fractal dimension of an
irregular group of lines, then the box counting procedure is appropriate. In the box counting
method a grid of boxes of a given size (s1 ) is superimposed over the drawing to be measured.
C. Bovill: Fractal Geometry as Design Aid 73
The number of boxes with lines in them is counted (n1 ). Then a smaller grid of boxes (s2 )
is superimposed over the drawing. The number of these smaller boxes with lines from the
drawing in them is counted (n2 ). The fractal dimension at this scale range is then calculated
by subtracting log n1 from log n2 and then dividing this by the difference between log s1 and
log s2 (Peitgen et al. [8]). This calculation represents the slope of a line on a log-log plot of
the points in question. A mathematical fractal like the Koch curve, shown as Fig. 1, that
continues its irregularities to infinity will have the same fractal dimension no matter what
box sizes one uses from very large to very small. Natural forms like coastlines tend to have a
scale range over which they are fractal.
Figure 2: A box counting grid placed over a window from the Robie House.
Bovill [4] has used the box counting method to explore the fractal characteristics of
Frank Lloyd Wright’s work. The long elevation of the Robie House displays a fractal
dimension that slowly drops from 1.6 toward 1.4 as the measurement scale drops from 24
feet to 3 feet. This range of scale represents the progression of views from across the street
to approaching the front door. The fractal dimension of a typical casement window from
the Robie House was determined to range from 1.7 to 1.6 through a scale range of six inches
down to one and a half inches. Wright kept up the complexity of his designs through a scale
range from 24 feet down to one inch. Fig. 2 shows a box counting grid placed over a casement
window from the Robie House. This is not surprising since his writings about design keep
coming back to observation of the deep structure of nature. Nature as Mandelbrot [7] has
shown is fractal. Nature displays a cascade of complexity from the organization of galaxies in
the universe (Mandelbrot [7]) to the structure of gold clusters observed under an electron
microscope (Feder [6]). The Villa Savoye subjected to a box counting analysis displays a
fractal dimension of 1.4 at the scale range of 8 feet but rapidly descends to a box counting
dimension of 1.0, minimal complexity, at the scale range of one foot (Bovill [4]). Corbu’s
forms display complexity at large and mid scale ranges but flatten out at the close in scale
range of a few feet down to inches.
74 C. Bovill: Fractal Geometry as Design Aid
4. Range Analysis
The box counting dimension looks at the cascade of complexity of line from large scale to
small scale. It will not however see with much precision the difference between a very regular
cascade of line density, and a cascade of line density that has a complex rhythm structure.
To determine the fractal characteristics of rhythm structures one must use range analysis.
Range analysis comes from H. E. Hurst who studied natural fluctuations through time
(Feder [6]). One of the time rhythms Hurst studied was flood levels on rivers. If one plots
flood levels over time the range from the lowest to the highest level can be measured. Range
analysis is performed by dividing the time span into equal sized increments (t1 ). The average
range from high to low value is calculated (r1 ). Then the time span is divided into smaller
increments (t2 ) and the average range from high to low value is calculated (r2 ). In general
as the time increments get smaller the range gets smaller. The Hurst Exponent is then
calculated as
log r1 − log r2
log t1 − log t2
(Bovill [4]). The fractal dimension is equal to two minus the Hurst Exponent.
A central characteristic of vernacular building is the pleasant variation in visual com-
position that is achieved with a limited pallet of architectural components. Range analysis
was applied to this vernacular variation by Bovill [5]. The process was looking for an or-
dering of the architectural elements that provided the most consistent fractal measurements
across a range of scales. The result showed that there was more than one ordering of the
architectural elements that produced a consistent fractal calculation across a range of scales
and that different orderings produced different fractal measurements. This suggests that the
attraction to the complex rhythms of vernacular design may result from the ability to order
the composition in multiple overlapping ways. Classical compositions generally provide only
one ordering of the composition to the observer.
5. Midpoint Displacement
Midpoint displacement is the most common method of producing fractal rhythms in time.
By varying the scaling of the midpoint jogs of a curve in an iterative procedure, rhythms
with different fractal dimensions can be produced. Adding a random component to the jogs
produces random fractal rhythms that are similar to the random fractal rhythms that Hurst
observed in natural fluctuations in time like river flows and temperature variations. Midpoint
displacement can be produced by hand at a small scale (Bovill [4]), but to truly explore
midpoint displacement a computer is necessary.
Figure 3: A row of townhouses laid out with the aid of a line of sheet music.
Then the notes on the score pick out a fractal variation of height and or width as shown in
Fig. 3. In a similar way architectural elements like window types, or cornice moldings can be
chosen in a fractal manner by ordering the architectural elements to be chosen to the musical
scale and then letting the notes chose the element (Bovill [4]).
7. Curdling
Mandelbrot [7] gave the name curdling to a procedure that produces a random fractal dust
in two dimensions. A fractal dust is a disconnected set of points that displays a clustered
characteristic. The Cantor set is an example of a fractal dust, however the Cantor set is
regular in its clustering. The stars in the night sky are a good example of a random fractal
dust.
Curdling is very simple. Start with a grid on a piece of paper. Then use a coin, dice,
or random generator to decide whether each of the squares of the grid is kept or not. Then
subdivide the kept squares again with a grid and repeat the process. This process is repeated
until the resolution of the drawing is reached. Fig. 4 shows an example of curdling through
76 C. Bovill: Fractal Geometry as Design Aid
three levels. Curdling produces a set of points that have a random clustered structure on to
which the observer can project his own interpretation of order. This makes curdling an ideal
method of exploring graphical interpretations of the concept of deconstruction.
Iterated function systems (IFS) provide a mathematical connection between the classic fractals
like the Koch curve and natural shapes like coastlines (Peitgen et al. [8]). Peitgen,
Jurgens, and Saup describe how IFS work through the analogy of a copy machine with
multiple reducing lenses. The resultant copies are fed back into the machine in an iterative
process. An interesting thing happens. The configuration of the lenses is what determines the
shape of the final image. What the original image was does not matter. For example, if there
are three reducing lenses arranged in an equilateral triangle, it does not matter whether the
original image was squares, circles, or ducks the final image will be the Sierpinski gasket.
Figure 6: The four level deep fractal character of a Doric temple — the entire temple,
the fluted columns, the triglyphs, and the mutules created with an IFS.
Fractal geometry provides many avenues of exploration for the architect or artist who is
interested in the new complex view of the world that science and mathematics are developing.
However it does take a little effort to conquer some mathematics and a little faith to let the
mathematics enter and influence the art.
78 C. Bovill: Fractal Geometry as Design Aid
References
[1] E. Ayrton: The Doric Temple. Thames and Hudson, Holland 1961.
[2] M. Barnsley, R. Devaney, B. Mandelbrot, H. Peitgen, D. Saup, R. Voss:
The Science of Fractal Images. Springer-Verlag, New York 1988.
[3] M. Barnsley: The Desktop Fractal design System. Academic Press, Boston 1992.
[4] C. Bovill: Fractal Geometry in Architecture and Design. Birkhauser, Boston 1996.
[5] C. Bovill: Fractal Calculations in Vernacular Design. Proc. International Association
for the Study of Traditional Environments, Berkeley, December 1996. Volume Ninety-
Seven / IASTE 97–96.
[6] J. Feder: Fractals. Plenum Press, New York 1988.
[7] B. Mandelbrot: The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W.H. Freeman and Company, New
York 1983.
[8] H. Peitgen, H. Jurgens, D. Saup: Chaos and Fractals. Springer-Verlag, New York
1992.