Policy Framework
National Action Plan
Name(Year):● National Action Plan of Marine Debris Management or Rencana Aksi Nasional Penanganan Sampah Laut (RAN PSL) 2018
Brief description:
In order to address and properly manage the marine debris issue especially plastic, the Government of Indonesia issued a Presidential Decree no. 83/2018 concerning the National Action Plan of Marine Debris Management. It set the target of 70% reduction of marine plastic debris by 2025.
It is a joint inter-sectoral framework to address the marine debris problem from upstream to downstream, encompassing five strategies:
- National movement to increase the stakeholder awareness;
- Land-based waste management;
- Waste management in the coastal and marine area;
- Funding mechanism, institutional-strengthening, supervision, and law enforcement; and
- Research and development.
There are 18 line-ministries mandated under the presidential decree in regard to marine debris management.
- Coordinating Ministry for Maritime & Investment Affairs acts as a chairman
- Ministry of Environment and Forestry acts as a daily chairman
- Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries
- Ministry of Public Works and Housing
- Minister of Home Affairs
- Minister of Foreign Affairs
- Minister of Finance
- Minister of Industry
- Ministry of Health
- Minister of Education and Culture
- Minister of Communication and Information
- Minister of Cooperatives and Small and Medium Enterprises
- Minister of Tourism
- Cabinet Secretary
- Head of the Maritime Security Agency.
- Ministry of National Development Planning
- National Research and Innovation Agency
- Ministry of Transportation
There are 59 activities of marine debris management mandated under the presidential decree (https://www.regulasip.id/book/8391/read). Moreover, in order to coordinate all of the activities from 18 line-ministries, the secretariat of the National Coordinating Team for Marine Debris Management was form.
Legal Framework
Name(Year):2018
Brief description:
Presidential Regulation number 83 in 2018 concerning marine debris management
Indicators and/or Targets
■ Plastic recycling:
Indicators: the total amount of recycled plastic waste through waste facilities (Ton) /
the total amount of plastic waste
■ Plastic use reduction:
Indicators: treduction of waste generation
Targets (if any): 30% of waste reduction from waste generation by 2025
■ Plastic leakage:
Indicators: The amount of Marine Plastic Debris reduction from the baseline of the total amount the marine plastic debris leakage estimation
Targets (if any): 70% of marine plastic debris by 2025
■ Beach Cleanup:
Indicators: the conducted beach cleanup activities represented across regional
■ Ghost Fishing Gear recovery:
Indicators: the total amount of abandoned, lost, or otherwise discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) and end of life fishing gear (EOLFG) got recovered
■ Others
Indicators: handled of waste generation
Targets (if any): 70% of waste managed from waste generation by 2025
Technical Standards, Guidelines and Methodologies
Topics
■ leakage monitoring
Brief Description:
There are four baseline research of marine debris monitoring in Indonesia. It includes:
- LIPI
In situ measurements of stranded marine debris using transect lines along the low tide coastline. Based on 2018 data - TKN PSL
Combining potential marine debris leakage from land-based and sea-based activities. Based on 2018 data. - World Bank
Modeling of waste data generated, waste composition, waste management systems, field analysis of waste disposal and capture, and in situ waste sampling in waterways and coastal areas. Based on 2014–2015 data. - NPAP
Modeling of waste mass flow analysis based on measurements in waste systems reported by local governments. Based on 2015–2018 data
Name of publication can be accessed through:
Measures
Measures across Value Chain
Product Specific Measures: ALDFG
Partnership and Innovation
Monitoring, Data Management, Understanding Flow of Plastics/MPL
International Collaboration
Measures across Value Chain | |||||||||||||||||||||
Actions for encouraging sustainable / circular product design (example: improved durability, reparability, recyclability, reduction of material use per product…etc.) | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Policy actions for encouraging plastic alternatives, recycled materials at production stage. | In Preparation | ||||||||||||||||||||
■ Use of recycled materials |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Steps taken towards restricting microplastics in products. | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reduce single-use plastic (shopping bags, straws etc.) by regulations or voluntary measures (such as ban, levy, others) | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
■ Regulatory Measures (ex: production ban, Ban on use..etc): |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Introduce Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Improve waste management and recycling system | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Promoting plastic waste re-use, recycling and recovery opportunities | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Install capturing trap/filter on drainage/river | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Conduct clean-up activities in rivers/ wetlands/ beaches/ coasts/ coral reefs/ sea floor, involving local communities involving local communities | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Product Specific Measures: ALDFG | |||||||||||||||||||||
Taken/to be taken National Level Action and/or Community Level Action on Clean sea initiatives including ghost net retrieval, ocean-bound plastics etc. | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Taken actions for preventing abandoned, lost and discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) being generated. | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Created/creating collection/recycling mechanism for ALDFG | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Partnership and Innovation | |||||||||||||||||||||
Boost multi-stakeholder involvement and awareness-raising | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Encourage/ Incentivize action by private sector companies to reduce/ sustainably manage their plastic waste. | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Encourage public awareness on MPL issues through formal education system and/or curriculum for | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Promote innovative solutions through Research & Development (e.g., subsidy program, investment fund etc.) | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Monitoring, Data Management, Understanding Flow of Plastics/MPL | |||||||||||||||||||||
Conduct Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of plastic products. What are the challenges if LCA is not conducted? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Scope: ■ National |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Conduct Material Flow Analysis (MFA) on plastics. What are the challenges if MFA is not conducted? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Scope: ■ National |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Conduct monitoring / estimation / scientific research on leakage of plastics/microplastics to the natural environment and/or flow of ocean surface. What are the challenges if these actions are not conducted? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures: Based on the source, Indonesia's marine debris leakage is divided into two, namely from activities in the land sector (land-based) and the sea sector (sea-based). Each source is calculated using a different method, adjusting the type of activity sector involved. A. Land-based B. Sea-based |
|||||||||||||||||||||
International Collaboration | |||||||||||||||||||||
Participate in international cooperation through international organizations, multi-national groups, etc. | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures: Many International NGOs are working with the government to manage and overcome MPL and waste management. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Support target region by your international cooperation initiatives/projects: South, Central and Southeast Asia | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specific Measures: |
Challenges
■ Recycling system improvement
Specific Challenges:
- No specific regulation to use recycled content in packaging
- Recycle industries are located mainly in Java islands.
■ Proper waste management system (including lack of local capacity)
Specific Challenges:
- The national waste collection rate was below 40% in 2020, with some regions below 20%.
There is a significant lack of producer participation in the management of plastic packaging waste. - Inadequate waste collection infrastructure, especially in rural, remote and island areas, leads to uncontrolled dumping into rivers, open fields or burning, causing pollution and health hazards.
- Many landfills in Indonesia are poorly managed, lacking proper liners, leachate collection systems and gas capture mechanisms, resulting in the release of pollutants that contaminate soil and groundwater and pose health risks to nearby communities.
■ Data collection related to waste in general
Specific Challenges:
- Indonesia has already National Waste Management Information System website (SIPSN) that gathered waste generation, waste competition, waste that go to the waste facilities and other information. The data was filled by the local governments.
There are 514 cities and regencies in Indonesia, however, some of them are not reporting regularly to the website.
■ Data collection related to marine plastic litter
Specific Challenges:
- Lack of data availability on annual monitoring of marine plastic litter from several sectors like from passenger ships, fishermen ship, aquaculture, ALDFG, EOLFG, and among others
■ Lack of financial incentives for waste treatment in general
Specific Challenges:
- Waste management in Indonesia often relies on subsidies due to inadequate cost recovery through user fees, resulting in funding gaps and unstable operating expenditures.
- Waste management budgets are less than 0.5% of local government budgets, hindering the establishment and maintenance of necessary infrastructure and services.
- High operating costs, including fuel, labour, and equipment maintenance, burden local governments and waste management organisations, limiting their ability to provide efficient services.
■ Lack of financial incentives for technology development
Specific Challenges:
- Although there has been investment in technology installations, the ongoing costs of daily processing are still being subsidized.
Best Practices
National level
Description:
Interfaith waste charity movement where the congregations in several house of worships are now can bring their clean and sorted waste to the mosques, churches, temples. Currently there are 140 mosques, 48 churches and 2 temples are implementing the interfaith waste charity movement.
Further Information
Marine debris monitoring at national level
Contact Details
Name: Vinda Damayanti
Position: Director
Division: Directorate of Waste Disposal Reduction
Organization: Ministry of Environment dan Forestry, Repblic of Indonesia
Email: [email protected]