Best Webcams From 1080p to 4K for 2025

Not all webcams are good enough to be considered "best," but not everyone cares about the same things. Here are some that stand out for coming close or having novel characteristics you may care about. (Not every webcam I test even makes it into the "other" list.)

Razer Kiyo X: Razer's entry-level webcam is a former top pick for best 1080p under $50. It stands out for its accurate white balance and solid exposure performance in consistent lighting. But if you're looking for something this inexpensive, you probably want a mic for the money as well, which the Kiyo X lacks.

Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra: A former top pick, Razer's top-end 4K webcam for streamers still offers some of the best image quality I've seen, thanks to one of the biggest sensors used in a webcam -- 1/1.2-inch -- delivering excellent color, exposure and focus. There are a lot of 4K 30fps/1080p 60fps models now, though, and this one remains very high priced ($300) for a lot of people. 

Obsbot Tiny 2: Another former recommendation for best-in-class, the Tiny 2 remains an excellent 4K choice that's been edged out by its cheaper, newer sibling, the Tiny 2 Lite. The latter has fewer features (no voice control, for one) and a slightly smaller sensor, but most people probably won't miss them -- the image quality, performance and audio quality are pretty comparable -- especially given the $100 price difference.

Obsbot Tiny 2 Lite: An excellent 4K PTZ camera, it lags the front-runner Insta360 Link because of tracking and focus performance, and the mic didn't sound quite as good. It's also a little more expensive than the Insta360.

Obsbot Meet 2: I actually really like this tiny webcam, which packs 4K and a mic into a camera with a footprint smaller than a packet of sweetener. It feels like it makes some sacrifices for size, though, such as relying too much on gaining up the mic (which can exacerbate noise or compression). On the other hand, it is less expensive than my top pick, the Insta360 Link 2C.

Insta360 Link 2: This is a great 4K PTZ webcam, offering similar quality and performance as the older model and with some features its predecessor lacks, including on-camera touch controls (such as for initiating tracking). But it's a lot bigger than I think most people want to deal with, and it's more expensive than the original.

Elgato Facecam Mk.2: On one hand, the Facecam delivers excellent 1080p 60fps video for streamers and integrates into Elgato's for-streamers ecosystem, like Stream Deck, as well as some novel (in the webcam space) features in the software, such as cinema LUTs. But there are some limitations that may affect some people, such as its reliance on Nvidia Broadcast for its virtual camera to handle things like background blur (which requires an Nvidia graphics card).

On one hand, you don't need to worry about too many specifications to figure out what you want; on the other, it helps to understand what you're looking at to prevent being blindsided by marketing claims. For instance, all webcams are plug-and-play, despite this frequently being called out as a novelty, and claims like "DSLR-quality video" are meaningless. AI is not magic; it doesn't automatically make a camera (or even a particular feature) better, and the term is used excessively and very loosely in marketing. Your new external webcam won't necessarily be better than the one integrated into your laptop. Integrated models increasingly are tuned to work with the operating systems in a way that third-party cameras aren't.

Improving your environment with good lighting or a better angle can often enhance the quality of your webcam video more than upgrading the camera itself. Even in an ideal environment, the best webcam won't necessarily deliver great video and audio quality on the other end; that can depend on the consistency and quality of your network connection as well as the software you're using. Videoconferencing software, for example, tends to aggressively process the video for smoother and more consistent transmission over the network rather than looking great.

Price

Webcams range from $20 to about $200, though some models whose prices haven't dropped over time can be more. In general, price rises as resolution, features and quality improve. Some good models are available for under $100, but if you want to save money on the pricier high-end models, you can frequently get the previous model at a good price, and they tend to go on sale at the usual times of the year, like Black Friday season.

Resolution

It's important to separate sensor resolution from video resolution. Many webcams with high-resolution capabilities (greater than 4K, or the equivalent of about 8 megapixels) don't produce video at those levels. Instead, they use the extra pixels to get better results when scaling down to the effective resolution of 1080p, 1440p or 4K, zooming and changing the field of view, low-light performance and more. That's why it's worth considering a 4K model to better frame yourself without looking soft, crunchy or blocky or to demonstrate physical objects. A good example that I think confuses people is the Opal Tadpole. Though listed, say, on Amazon as a 4K webcam, it doesn't output video at 4K; it groups the pixels on the 48MP sensor down to 1080p for better tonal performance and sharpness.

Also, don't assume that your software -- mostly videoconferencing software like Zoom -- can take advantage of a camera with a high-resolution sensor. Many are limited to 1080p (1,920x1,080 pixels; equivalent to 2 megapixels) because it doesn't require as much bandwidth to stream over its network. Keep in mind that software can also take a good image and make it look worse. It does that by compressing excessively for transmission across the software's low-bandwidth pipeline.

Avoid 720p unless you're desperate and have no money. Even then, you can get a no-name 1080p model for about $20 (maybe less) that will at least be marginally better.

Field of view

Most webcams usually have a fixed field of view (which from your perspective is zoom or the amount of the view the lens covers); that's fine as long as it covers the amount you need. It's specified in degrees, typically in the range of about 65 degrees (narrow, covering roughly your head and shoulders) to 90 degrees (which can accommodate another person in the view). Conference room webcams tend to have a much wider angle of view, unsurprisingly.

Webcams that list multiple fields of view will frequently use digital zoom to achieve it, which means you want to go for a high-resolution webcam; it can look really bad when you start with a 1080p camera.

If the webcam has a wide FOV, then it will likely have distortion that makes straight vertical lines on the sides curve. If that will bother you, look for a narrower FOV, or for a webcam that uses multiple lens elements, which can combat distortion.

Microphones

Not all webcams have built-in microphones. Models targeted at streamers usually don't, for instance, since the assumption is you'll be using a high-quality headset or standalone mic instead of the webcam mic. Built-in mics tend to be intended for everyday videoconferencing, and you rarely have any control over the characteristics of the sound.

Some are better than others. Noise cancellation sometimes works well, but it often makes your voice sound a little (or a lot) processed, and you can't always control how aggressive it is. Many of the mics are omnidirectional, meaning they pick up sound from multiple locations, but that can generally be compensated for computationally.

Bottom line: If you care about sound quality and can tell good from bad, opt for a non-integrated mic or assume you'll need to supplement it with a dedicated mic. If you just want something "good enough," look at user reviews just to verify that a given webcam doesn't have relevant complaints about the mic.

Design

These come in a billion different sizes and shapes, but the mounts -- the physical clip that lets you perch it on your screen -- are all very similar and tend to be stable but cumbersome. There's no "best" design, but if you want to use it on a laptop, you may want to avoid the big, clunky models.

One advantage bigger models have is the ability to remove the mounts or attach the mount itself to a tripod. Even a small tabletop tripod sitting behind your laptop screen can help avoid the weird looking-down angle you see with a lot of laptop webcams, by raising it to eye level. You'll probably still look down occasionally, but it feels more natural for the people on the other end.

The covers vary a lot, and the ones that completely detach and are fiddly to attach can be annoying, and I lose them about 10 minutes after unboxing. If you're tossing the webcam in a bag and carrying it around, you should use something to protect the front.

Other features

Most of a webcam's features are only available via software. Almost any camera will work when you plug it into your USB-C or USB-A port (although 4K webcams frequently need a high-speed USB-C connection and cable to get full resolution). Many of them work well this way.

These features are essential, and they're provided only by software: the ability to override exposure settings when they need correction; some small white-balance control (auto usually delivers the best results, but I like to be able to make it slightly warmer or cooler); manual focus and the ability to save the changes as presets. Presets are doubly important for cameras modeled off commercial PTZ (pan, tilt and zoom) webcams like the Obsbot and Insta360 models.

All the cameras focus automatically, but unless you move around a lot, manual focus will let you set it and forget it, and even if you move a bit, you don't have to deal with the webcam trying to lock onto you again. At best, it'll snap into focus after a slight delay; alternatively, it will pulse unattractively searching for a focus lock. At its worst, it will fail to lock entirely. Although it's starting to change a bit on the higher end, webcams typically focus on the whole view.

The number of manufacturers offering MacOS-compatible utilities has grown to the point where most cameras support it; webcams intended for gaming streamers can be the exception, because Mac gamers are still a relatively small segment of the market. The only settings you can control on the Mac natively aren't really intended for webcams; neither Portrait mode (to blur the background) or Studio Lighting (to change the foreground-background exposure balance) works as well on the Mac, especially with third-party webcams, as it does on an iPhone. Not all the software is as full-featured on both platforms or maintained over time.

For Windows, consider whether you want to use Windows Hello for face recognition. Only a few external webcams support it (the original Logitech Brio 4K comes to mind, not the MX Brio), but not all. Usually, if a webcam supports it, the manufacturer mentions it in the marketing materials.

To test webcams, I record uncompressed video under various controlled lighting situations (optimal, typical, dim as well as any special cases the webcam is specifically intended for) and with most of the adjustments available in any bundled software, along with a running commentary captured from the webcam's mic if it has one, using OBS software. I also use the webcam for work to suss out any compatibility issues and adapt and expand my testing to cover any special uses the camera may be designed for. That includes high frame rate recording and virtual camera operation.

To judge the quality, I play the video back at 1:1, evaluating exposure, white balance, noise, distortion and any other potential artifacts. For audio, I judge it by how natural the tone is and voice pickup, background noise cancellation (and the effect the NC has on the naturalness of the sound) and more. If the audio sounds overprocessed or has artifacts, I open it in audio editing software to look at the waveform for signs of compression or frequency cutoffs.

I also evaluate the software that comes with the camera for notable features -- vertical video support, tracking, supported frame rates