Microsoft, TomTom settle patent dispute
Microsoft and TomTom have reached a settlement in their respective patent suits, the companies said Monday.
As part of the deal, as TomTom will pay Microsoft for patent protection related to mapping patents and file-management patents that Microsoft claimed were infringed by TomTom's use of the Linux kernel. Microsoft will also get access to the TomTom patents that were cited in TomTom's countersuit against Microsoft, although Microsoft won't make any payment to TomTom.

In a statement, the two companies said that the settlement provides TomTom patent coverage "in a manner that is fully compliant with TomTom's obligations under the General Public License Version 2." As part of the agreement, TomTom will "remove from its products the functionality related to two file management systems patents" over the next two years. The agreement protects TomTom's customers under the patents during that time, the companies said.
The settlement has a five-year term. Specific financial terms were not disclosed. With respect to Microsoft's mapping patents and TomTom's patents, the two companies have agreed to take no further legal action for the duration of the term. In the case of the three file management patents, Microsoft is providing an agreement not to sue customers for their use of TomTom's products.
"We are pleased TomTom has chosen to resolve the litigation amicably by entering into a patent agreement," Microsoft deputy general counsel Horacio Gutierrez said in a statement.
Microsoft filed its legal actions against TomTom last month. Attention was focused on the Linux claim as it marked the first time that Microsoft had filed court papers with its long-held assertion that Linux infringes on its intellectual property.
"This agreement puts an end to the litigation between our two companies," said Peter Spours, Director of IP Strategy and Transactions at TomTom, in a statement. "It is drafted in a way that ensures TomTom's full compliance with its obligations under the GPLv2, and thus reaffirms our commitment to the open source community."
Although the pact may settles things for TomTom, it adds further questions marks for where Microsoft is headed with its broader claims against Linux. The software maker has refused to go into detail as to what actions it might take against other companies that use Linux commercially.
However, the company has aggressively sought patent deals with companies that use Linux commercially. In addition to its deals with Linux vendors such as Novell, TurboLinux, and Xandros, Microsoft has also signed pacts with consumer electronics firms that use Linux, such LG, Samsung, and Fuji Xerox.
In recent interviews, Gutierrez has said that, although each case is different, Microsoft has an obligation to its shareholders as well as to the companies that have taken patent licenses to ensure that Microsoft is being fairly compensated for its intellectual property, including in cases involving Linux.
Until the TomTom case, we had only seen examples where Microsoft was able to convince companies to take a license. The TomTom case shows, though, that we may see Microsoft begin to take further action when negotiations don't lead to a deal.

Finally after their 3rd hail mary - suing MS didn't work, they knew they were up against the wall and settled.
TomTom should have done the right thing and paid MS for the IP that they infringed - plain and simple.
Yeah.
And if FAT is the only issue, I don't care if M$ sues. I *hate* FAT, & NTFS. Take that, M$!
Some of you Linux users are so fanatical and blinded by your constant Windows vs Linux rhetoric that you don't even realize how completely stupid some of your comments are.
This is pretty well an obsolite file system anyway. Of course, the way the U.S. patent system works, it might never run out.
That said, FAT doesn't offer innovation and it is only because of Microsoft's monopoly that they are in a position to sue those that use it or write to it. I think the EU should look into this.
EU is a joke.
And you can't claim a monopoly on anyone with a patent that you dislike.
Tom Tom gave away the store by caving in about the linux part - they seem to have implicitly agreed that the Mafia has a right to interfere with linux.
It's typical of MS that they want to give the impression that using anything Linux based is opening yourself up to litigation. This is why, I may find MS's products useful but I despise their actions as a company. For some reason I'm thinking about leopards and their spots.
I'll simplify it. At what point are TomTom's customers in any way liable for TomTom's infringement? If there isn't one, why are MS 'promising not to sue customers' for something they can't sue customers for in the first place? Gee, let me think...
It's the same scare tactic MS have been using against F/OSS for years. The nebulously vague threat of being sued should you merely download Linux or buy it from anyone not sanctioned by MS (Novell, Xandros and... oh, Linspire (RIP)) that they paraded just as year or so back along with the 286,202,875,778 patents which no-one know what they are.
I don't give a rats arse if it's a business for profit or not, that's no excuse for sharp tactics. Honestly, some people would excuse selling rat poison to children if it was sold by 'a business for profit'.
For Microsoft this is a disaster in customer relations not a success
Having Tom Tom as a non-paying customer is meaningless. This is not a loss for MS in anyway.
On top of that, MS got FREE USE of Tom Tom's IP.
I dislike most of these software patents, but as they go, this one seems easier to get behind than most (e.g. the company that patented "Buy It Now" 8-/
This act slows Microsoft down in getting a judgement of its patent assertions against Linux code. If their assertion is valid, then a judgement could be used in quick order against every money-making Linux vendor with US offices. If it's incorrect, and a judge says so, then TomTom will get its money back on that portion of their agreement with Microsoft.
TomTom has slowed Microsoft down in getting this in front of a judge, and has done the right thing on multiple counts. That's a jolly big tip-of-the-hat from me to them.
Hehe, here is one linux "rabbidt" that knows that linux is built on sand :)