Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of the energy consumption of five tabletop electric cooking appliances

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research tested the energy consumption and efficiency of five electric tabletop appliances (cooktops) used in home cooking, specifically induction, infrared, resistance plate, resistance coil, and electric pot. The water boiling test with a cold start was used to determine the energy consumption and the efficiency for each appliance with variable volumes of water—500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 mL—and two pot sizes of 3 and 5 quarts. The effect of cold vs. hot start was evaluated with one water volume, 1000 mL, on all appliances. The electric pot was studied with and without insulation to determine if it is worth insulating the pot that comes un-insulated from the factory. Also, the appliances were subjected to simulated simmering tests to determine which device was more efficient in slow cooking. Of the five appliances tested, the induction cooktop and the electric pot were the most energy efficient and took the least time to boil water. Moreover, the energy efficiency and heating time were similar for the induction matched with the smaller pot and the electric pot. Induction lost efficiency by approximately ten percentage points when used with the large pot, thus reinforcing the importance of matching the pot size with the heating element. During the simmering experiments, induction proved easier than resistance coil to control the temperature in the culinary simmering band, from 85 to 100 °C; however, the energy consumption difference between induction and resistance coil was unclear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

Download references

Funding

The University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture partly funded this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rubén O. Morawicki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This research was conducted at the University of Arkansas Food Science Department during the corresponding author’s employment as an Associate Professor at that institution.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rose, H.R., Morawicki, R.O. Comparison of the energy consumption of five tabletop electric cooking appliances. Energy Efficiency 16, 101 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-023-10181-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-023-10181-x

Keywords