Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Economic Assessment of Morel (Morchella spp.) Foraging in Michigan, USA

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wild–foraged mushrooms represent a natural resource that provides economic value to foragers through both market and nonmarket recreational channels. Despite the importance of non–timber forest resources for sustainable management of forestlands, little attention has been paid to who forages for wild mushrooms, why they choose to forage, where they go, and what economic value is generated. This report draws upon survey data from 78 foragers who are certified to sell their mushrooms and 85 noncertified foraging enthusiasts. Its goal is to understand foraging patterns and values for morels (Morchella spp.) in the State of Michigan (USA). Most foragers spend fewer than 10 days each year foraging, and those who sell their morels are most likely to sell to local restaurants, pubs and bars, and informally to their friends. Certified foragers who choose to sell their morels sell for an average price of $36 per pound ($36/lb) for fresh black or yellow morels. Costs to supply fresh morels ranged widely among the 16 certified sellers who reported full cost details; over 70% of morels were supplied at costs below $30/lb, but some certified sellers incurred costs in the hundreds of dollars per pound. Recreational morel gatherers paid $43 to $335 per trip of foraging morels, with a median value of $93 per trip. Morel foragers also search for other mushrooms with oyster mushrooms (Pleurtous spp.), chanterelles (Cantharellus spp), hen–of the–woods (Grifola frondosa), and chicken–of–the–woods (Laetiporus spp) being the most popular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Benucci, G., M. Niccolò, R. Longley, P. Zhang, Q. Zhao, G. Bonito, and F. Yu. 2019. Microbial communities associated with the black morel cultivated in greenhouses. PeerJ (Biology Articles) 7:1–19. https://peerj.com/articles/7744/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buyck, B., I. Olariaga, B. Looney, J. Justice, and V. Hofstetter. 2016. Wisconsin chanterelles revisited and first indications for very wide distributions of Cantharellus species in the United States East of the Rocky Mountains. Cryptogamie, Mycologie 37(3):345–366. https://doi.org/10.7872/crym/v37.iss3.2016.345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, M., D. Pettenella, and E. Vidale. 2011. Income generation from wild mushrooms in marginal rural areas. Forest Policy and Economics 13(3):221–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, O. 2020. A case for the commercial harvest of wild edible fungi in Northwestern Ontario. Lakehead University Undergraduate Thesis. https://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/4676. Accessed 12 Apr 2022.

  • Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

  • de Frutos, P., B. Rodriguez–Prado, J. Latorre, and F. Martinez–Peña. 2019. A gravity model to explain flows of wild edible mushroom picking. A panel data analysis. Ecological Economics 156:164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.09.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dissanayake, A. A., G. L. Mills, G. Bonito, B. Rennick, and M. G. Nair. 2021. Chemical composition and anti–inflammatory and antioxidant activities of extracts from cultivated morel mushrooms, species of genus Morchella (Ascomycota). International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms 23(9):73–83. https://www.dl.begellhouse.com/journals/708ae68d64b17c52,1d3124b42b5cd61f,2b058d161d26ce96.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egli, S., M. Peter, C. Buser, W. Stahel, and F. Ayer. 2006. Mushroom picking does not impair future harvests–Results of a long–term study in Switzerland. Biological Conservation 129(2):271–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J., T. Malone, L. J. Robison, and N. Rothwell. 2019 Is ‘localness’ about distance or relationships? Evidence from hard cider. Journal of Wine Economics 14(4):252–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2019.42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, G. E., S. J. Alexander, J. L. Chamberlain, K. A. Blatner, A. W. Coffin, and R. J. Barlow. 2019. Markets and market values of nontimber forest products in the United States: A review, synthesis, and identification of future research needs. Journal of Forestry 117(6):613–631. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, G. E., K. A. Blatner, M. G. Jacobson, C. M. S. Downes, E. O. Sills, D. E. Mercer, S. J. Alexander, J. L. Chamberlain, M. A. Gold, L. D. Godsey, and M. R. Emery. 2018. Economics of nontimber forest products. In: Assessment of nontimber forest products in the United States under changing conditions, General Technical Report SRS–232J. L. Chamberlain, M. R. Emery, and T. Patel–Weynand, eds.,119–149. Asheville, North Carolina: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station.

  • Górriz–Mifsud, E., V. M. Govigli, and J. A. Bonet. 2017. What to do with mushroom pickers in my forest? Policy tools from the landowners’ perspective. Land Use Policy 63:450–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallen, H. 2015. May is morel month in Michigan. Michigan State University Extension. https://www.canr.msu.edu/resources/may_is_morel_month_in_michigan_e2755. Accessed 12 Apr 2022.

  • Hamayun, M., S. A. Khan, H. Ahmad, D. Shin, and I. Lee. 2006. Morel collection and marketing: A case study from the Hindu–Kush Mountain region of Swat, Pakistan. Lyonia 11(2):7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, J., S. Simnitt, and L. Calvin. 2020. Fruit and tree nuts outlook: March 2020. USDA Economic Research Service. FTS–370. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub–details/?pubid=98169.

  • Larson, A. J., C. A. Cansler, S. G. Cowdery, S. Hiebert, T. J. Furniss, M. E. Swanson, and J. A. Lutz. 2016. Post–fire morel (Morchella) mushroom abundance, spatial structure, and harvest sustainability. Forest Ecology and Management 377:16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q., H. Ma, Y. Zhang, and C. Dong. 2018. Artificial cultivation of true morels: Current state, issues and perspectives. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 38(2):259–271. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28585444/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longley, R., G. Maria, N. Benucci, G. Mills, and G. Bonito. 2019. Fungal and bacterial community dynamics in substrates during the cultivation of morels (Morchella rufobrunnea) indoors. FEMS Microbiology Letters 366(17). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31603508/. Accessed 12 Apr 2022.

  • Loomis, J. B., M. Knaus, and M. Dziedzic. 2019. Integrated quantification of forest total economic value. Land Use Policy 84:335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupi, F., D. J. Phaneuf, and R. H. von Haefen. 2020. Best practices for implementing recreation demand models. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 14(2):302–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/reaa007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, R. 2019. An examination of recent revealed preference valuation methods and results. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 13(2):267–282. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rez003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development. 2019. Southern Dakelh Nation Alliance monitoring morel harvesting. British Columbia Information Bulletin. https://archive.news.gov.bc.ca/releases/news_releases_2017–2021/2019FLNR0193–001512.htm. Accessed 12 Apr 2022.

  • Moreno, F. F. and T. Malone. 2021. The role of collective food identity and willingness to pay for local foods. Agricultural & Resource Economics Review 50(1):22–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2020.9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W. 2001. The economic value of forest ecosystems. Ecosystem Health 7(4):284–296. 10.1046/j.1526–0992.2001.01037.x.

  • Pilz, D., R. McLain, S. Alexander, L. Villarreal–Ruiz, S. Berch, T. L. Wurtz, C. G. Parks, E. McFarlane, B. Baker, R. Molina, and J. E. Smith. 2007. Ecology and management of morels harvested from the forests of Western North America. General Technical Report PNW–GTR–710. U.S.D.A. U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilz, D. and R. Molina. 2002. Commercial harvests of edible mushrooms from the forests of the Pacific Northwest United States: Issues, management, and monitoring for sustainability. Forest Ecology and Management 155(1–3):3–16. 10.1016/S0378–1127(01)00543–6.

  • Sirrine, R. 2017. Wild mushroom certification courses scheduled. Michigan State University Extension. https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/wild_mushroom_certification_courses_scheduled. Accessed 12 Apr 2022.

  • Thompson, V. V. 1994. Morel: A lifetime pursuit. Glencoe: Missouri Mycological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiita, A. L. and T. L. Wurtz. 2004. The morel mushroom industry in Alaska: Current status and potential. Fairbanks: Institute of Social and Economic Research. University of Alaska Fairbanks, School of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences. https://iseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/morel_final.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2022.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Michigan State University AgBioResearch, USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) North Central Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (NC–SARE) 00419498, and NSF project 1946445 for research support. We are grateful to Midwest American Mycological Information and Denise Clemens and Jim Padden of MDARD for helpful discussions, to Frank Lupi for advice on travel cost survey methods, and to survey respondents for taking the time and interest to complete the survey. Data will be made available upon request. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Michigan State University. All authors contributed equally to this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

    Trey Malone, Scott M. Swinton & Aastha Pudasainee

  2. Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

    Gregory Bonito

Authors
  1. Trey Malone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Scott M. Swinton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aastha Pudasainee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gregory Bonito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trey Malone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malone, T., Swinton, S.M., Pudasainee, A. et al. Economic Assessment of Morel (Morchella spp.) Foraging in Michigan, USA. Econ Bot 76, 1–15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-022-09548-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-022-09548-5

Key Words

Profiles

  1. Trey Malone View author profile