Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Integrating Argument Mapping with Systems Thinking Tools: Advancing Applied Systems Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge Cartography

Part of the book series: Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing ((AI&KP))

Abstract

In the absence of meaningful strategies to promote critical thinking, systems thinking, and social intelligence, it has been argued that algorithm-driven web technology will not only serve to damage human creativity, technology may ultimately reduce our collective intelligence. At the same time, the history of group decision-making in education, business, and public administration highlights that working groups often fail to solve complex problems because their method of collaborative problem solving is ineffective. Decades of research in social psychology and the learning sciences highlight the many limitations of group problem solving, including the tendency to focus on a limited set of ideas, select ideas based on biased ‘rules of thumb’, and failure to build trust, consensus and collective vision. A fundamental skill for resolving complex social and scientific problems is the ability to collectively visualise the structure of a shared problem, and use this knowledge to design solutions and strategies for collective action. In this chapter, we describe an approach to knowledge cartography that seeks to overcome three independent human limitations which impede our ability to resolve complex problems: poor critical thinking skills, no clear methodology to facilitate group coherence, consensus design and collective action, and limited computational capacities. Building on Warfield’s vision for applied systems sciences, we outline a new systems science tool which currently combines two thought structuring methodologies: Argument Mapping for critical thinking, and Interactive Management for system design. We further describe how teaching and learning a form of knowledge cartography grounded in applied systems science requires a vision around the development of Tools, Talents, and Teams. We also provide examples of how our approach to knowledge cartography and applied systems science has been used in business and educational settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 85.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

') var buybox = document.querySelector("[data-id=id_"+ timestamp +"]").parentNode var buyingOptions = buybox.querySelectorAll(".buying-option") ;[].slice.call(buyingOptions).forEach(initCollapsibles) var buyboxMaxSingleColumnWidth = 480 function initCollapsibles(subscription, index) { var toggle = subscription.querySelector(".buying-option-price") subscription.classList.remove("expanded") var form = subscription.querySelector(".buying-option-form") var priceInfo = subscription.querySelector(".price-info") var buyingOption = toggle.parentElement if (toggle && form && priceInfo) { toggle.setAttribute("role", "button") toggle.setAttribute("tabindex", "0") toggle.addEventListener("click", function (event) { var expandedBuyingOptions = buybox.querySelectorAll(".buying-option.expanded") var buyboxWidth = buybox.offsetWidth ;[].slice.call(expandedBuyingOptions).forEach(function(option) { if (buyboxWidth <= buyboxMaxSingleColumnWidth && option != buyingOption) { hideBuyingOption(option) } }) var expanded = toggle.getAttribute("aria-expanded") === "true" || false toggle.setAttribute("aria-expanded", !expanded) form.hidden = expanded if (!expanded) { buyingOption.classList.add("expanded") } else { buyingOption.classList.remove("expanded") } priceInfo.hidden = expanded }, false) } } function hideBuyingOption(buyingOption) { var toggle = buyingOption.querySelector(".buying-option-price") var form = buyingOption.querySelector(".buying-option-form") var priceInfo = buyingOption.querySelector(".price-info") toggle.setAttribute("aria-expanded", false) form.hidden = true buyingOption.classList.remove("expanded") priceInfo.hidden = true } function initKeyControls() { document.addEventListener("keydown", function (event) { if (document.activeElement.classList.contains("buying-option-price") && (event.code === "Space" || event.code === "Enter")) { if (document.activeElement) { event.preventDefault() document.activeElement.click() } } }, false) } function initialStateOpen() { var buyboxWidth = buybox.offsetWidth ;[].slice.call(buybox.querySelectorAll(".buying-option")).forEach(function (option, index) { var toggle = option.querySelector(".buying-option-price") var form = option.querySelector(".buying-option-form") var priceInfo = option.querySelector(".price-info") if (buyboxWidth > buyboxMaxSingleColumnWidth) { toggle.click() } else { if (index === 0) { toggle.click() } else { toggle.setAttribute("aria-expanded", "false") form.hidden = "hidden" priceInfo.hidden = "hidden" } } }) } initialStateOpen() if (window.buyboxInitialised) return window.buyboxInitialised = true initKeyControls() })()

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.spss.com.hk/amos/

  2. 2.

    http://www.statmodel.com/

  3. 3.

    http://vensim.com/

  4. 4.

    http://www.powersim.com/

  5. 5.

    The software is available upon request. Please contact [email protected]

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1981). Creating the corporate future: Plan or be planned for. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberts, H. (1992, March). Acquisition: Past, present and future. Paper presented at the meeting of the Institute of Management Sciences and Operations Research Society, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez-Ortiz, M., C. (2007) Does Philosophy Improve Critical Thinking Skills? Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1982). Reasoning, learning, and action: Individual and organizational. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. R. (1958). Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica, 1(2), 1–17.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. E. (1966). The impact of the social sciences. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, J. G., Passant, A., & Decker, S. (2009).Social Semantic Web. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Broome, B. J. (1995a). Collective design of the future: Structural analysis of tribal vision statements. American Indian Quarterly, 19, 205–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broome, B. (1995b). The role of facilitated group process in community-based planning and design: Promoting greater participation in Comanche tribal governance. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Innovations in group facilitation: Applications in natural settings (pp. 27-52). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome, B. J. (2006). Applications of Interactive Design Methodologies in Protracted Conflict Situations. Facilitating group communication in context: Innovations and applications with natural groups. Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome, B. J. and Christakis, A. N. (1988). A culturally-sensitive approach to Tribal governance issue management. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 12, 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broome, B. J., & Chen, M. (1992). Guidelines for computer-assisted group problem-solving: Meeting the challenges of complex issues. Small Group Research, 23, 216–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broome, B. J., & Cromer, I. L. (1991). Strategic planning for tribal economic development: A culturally appropriate model for consensus building. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2, 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broome, B. J., & Fulbright, L. (1995). A multi-stage influence model of barriers to group problem solving. Small Group Research, 26, 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham Shum S., Lind M. and Weigand H. (2007). (Eds.) Proceedings 2nd International Conference on the Pragmatic Web (22–23 Oct. 2007, Tilburg: NL). ISBN: 978-1-59593-859-6. Open Access Eprint: http://oro.open.ac.uk/9275

  • Chang, N. (2010). Using Structural Equation Modelling to Test the Validity of Interactive Management. Western Political Science Association 2010 Annual Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=15805

  • Christakis, A. N. (1987). Systems profile: The Club of Rome revisited. Systems Research, 4, 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, H. (1973). The decision makers. Center Magazine, 6, 5, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coke, J. G., & Moore, C. M. (1981). Coping with a budgetary crisis: Helping a city council decide where expenditure cuts should be made. In S. W. Burks & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Building city council leadership skills: A casebook of models and methods (pp. 72–85). Washington, DC: National League of Cities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, T. E. & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, C., Hogan, M.J., Stewart, I. (2013). An examination of the effects of argument mapping on students’ memory and comprehension performance. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facione, J. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction: The California Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeg, R. (1988). Forum of the future of pediatric nursing: Looking toward the 21st century. Pediatric Nursing, 14, 393–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, M.J. & Broome, B. (2012). Well-Being in Ireland: Overcoming Barriers to Well-Being in Ireland, Conference Report, NUI, Galway. http://www.nuigalway.ie/psy/documents/wellbeing_ireland_conference_using_interactive_management_consultation_methodology.pdf

  • Hogan, M.J. & Broome, B. (2013). Wellbeing in Ireland – Designing Measures and Implementing Policies, Conference Report, NUI, Galway. http://www.nuigalway.ie/psy/documents/wellbeing_ireland_2013_conference_preliminary_report.pdf

  • Hogan, M.J., Harney O., & Broome, B. (2014). A Proposal for Systems Science Education. In, Wegerif, R., Kaufman, J. Li L. (Eds). The Routledge Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking. (In Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keever, D. B. (1989, April). Cultural complexities in the participative design of a computer-based organization information system. Paper presented at the International Conference on Support, Society and Culture: Mutual Uses of Cybernetics and Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, J. (1980). Saving American democracy: The lesson of Three Mile Island. Technology Review, 83, 7, 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanier, J. (2010). You Are Not a Gadget. New York: Alfred A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maani, K.E and Cavana, R.Y. (2000). Systems Thinking and Modelling: Understanding Change and Complexity, Prentice Hall, Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 137–168.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychology Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H.W.J. and Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, T. (1979). Determination of hierarchical networks of instructional units using the ISM method. Educational Technology Research, 3, 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoop M., de Moor A. and Dietz J.L.G. (2006) The Pragmatic Web: A Manifesto. Communications of the ACM, 49: pp. 75–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1125944.1125979

  • Simon, H. A. (1960). The new science of management decisions. New York: Harper & Row.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Z., Dawson, T. and Fischer, K. W. 2010. “Redesigning testing: Operationalizing the new science of learning”. In New science of learning: Cognition, computers, and collaboration in education, Edited by: Khine, M. S. and Saleh, I. M. 207–224. New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Gelder, T. J., Bissett, M., & Cumming, G. (2004). Cultivating Expertise in Informal Reasoning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 142–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vennix, J. (1996). Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using Systems Dynamics. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J. N. (2006). An introduction to systems science. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NUI, Galway, Galway, Ireland

    Michael Hogan & Owen Harney

  2. Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA

    Benjamin Broome

Authors
  1. Michael Hogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Owen Harney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benjamin Broome
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Hogan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom

    Alexandra Okada

  2. Connected Intelligence Centre, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

    Simon J. Buckingham Shum

  3. Sheffield Hallam University Centre for Science Education, Sheffield, United Kingdom

    Tony Sherborne

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hogan, M., Harney, O., Broome, B. (2014). Integrating Argument Mapping with Systems Thinking Tools: Advancing Applied Systems Science. In: Okada, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Sherborne, T. (eds) Knowledge Cartography. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6470-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6470-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6469-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6470-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics